Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airport TAX In Sweden  
User currently offlineSK909 From Denmark, joined Nov 2005, 261 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 7 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 2763 times:

I found this article in a swedish newspaper:
Airport tax in Sweden

As I understand it they will implement a 96 SEK tax on domestic and European flight, and 430 SEK tax on long haul flights from Juli 1. 2006

This seems to be very bad for LCC in Sweden. And on the other hand help SK.

Does anyone have aa angle on this?

[Edited 2005-12-23 14:59:19]


Life's for Living!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineScallar From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 142 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2749 times:

Yes, well we have outrageous taxes on everything else here in Sweden, so I guess that was the only thing they could come up with. And why am I not surprised that this great idea comes from the leftish green party (environmentalists)? They actually believe that there will be a lot less pollution if they stop LCC's from operating in Sweden.  Yeah sure Sheesh!

The article above is actually criticising this tax, and the author ends with:
"This country's transport politics has been cut down by people that most of all wants the Swedish people to travel by foot or sleighs"  bigthumbsup 

/Scallar


User currently offlineScalebuilder From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2739 times:

Quoting Scallar (Reply 1):
And why am I not surprised that this great idea comes from the leftish green party (environmentalists)? They actually believe that there will be a lot less pollution if they stop LCC's from operating in Sweden. Sheesh!

This will take a "big bite" out of travel in Sweden. It will pay off to drive or travel by other means to OSL or CPH and fly from there, especially long-haul.

Quoting SK909 (Thread starter):
This seems to be very bad for LCC in Sweden. And on the other hand help SK.

Don't see how this can help SAS at all. Feel free to explain.


User currently offlineSK909 From Denmark, joined Nov 2005, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2735 times:

The interesting ting is that Sweden, is a rather large country or should I say long. Sweden stretch some 2000-2500 km. The only other possibilities are train or car. And with the fuel price in Sweden, at 11 SEK it is rather expensive to drive. And trains they are slow and not always on time...  Smile

Funny that they want to implement that kind of tax.



Life's for Living!
User currently offlineScalebuilder From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2733 times:

Quoting SK909 (Reply 3):
Funny that they want to implement that kind of tax.

Completely agree. This tax actually harms the environment.


User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2728 times:

It has been the great invention of Chaques Chirac ( in France we call it already the "Taxe Chirac" ) who thought that black-mailing airline passengers into another tax (in addition to already outrageous existing taxes ) would bring relieve to Aids- research for third world countries.
This money will go right into the pockets of pharmaceutical companies who have already tons of "research subsidies" from the EU!
It is an absolute scandal this tax is being authorirzed, when a drop in VAT for restaurants in France has been refused for many years by Germany ...
People in the third world will not benefit at all from this tax but barely be used as an excuse .I live in France but totally disagree with this stupid invention !



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineSK909 From Denmark, joined Nov 2005, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2719 times:

Quoting Scalebuilder (Reply 2):
Don't see how this can help SAS at all. Feel free to explain.

Well as I see it 96 SEK on top of LCC price makes it relatively higher than it would on SK price. Working for SK. I thing SK estimates an average price increase at 15-20%.

Though it will make it harder for SK to make money. And it will prolong the recovery fase SK is through.

On long haul it will not necessarily be an advantage. It will only drive passengers to CPH, OSL or HEL for long haul flights.

Quoting Scalebuilder (Reply 4):
Completely agree. This tax actually harms the environment.

Yes absolutely... In Denmark we had the same tax for many years. Now pr. 2007 the tax will withdrawn it. Because it wasn't benefiting the environment.

Merry christmas



Life's for Living!
User currently offlineSK909 From Denmark, joined Nov 2005, 261 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 6 days ago) and read 2713 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 5):
It has been the great invention of Chaques Chirac ( in France we call it already the "Taxe Chirac" ) who thought that black-mailing airline passengers into another tax (in addition to already outrageous existing taxes ) would bring relieve to Aids- research for third world countries.

Unfortunately it is not French invention, as Denmark has had an outrages PAX tax. Though our tax had no sad excuse as being aid to third world contries. Only a very bad excuse to fill the pockets of the Treasure....

Though I must say that the Frech tax is BS! Newer have I ever heard of such stupid excuse!



Life's for Living!
User currently offlineScalebuilder From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 2695 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 5):
It has been the great invention of Chaques Chirac ( in France we call it already the "Taxe Chirac" ) who thought that black-mailing airline passengers into another tax (in addition to already outrageous existing taxes ) would bring relieve to Aids- research for third world countries.

In someways I admire this kind of vision. It is altruistic and self sacrificing. Just do not see the connection between this tax and air travel. It almost seems to me that those who can afford air travel are stigmatized as being too well off.....so now we will charge you an additional tax as a result (shame on you for flying!!).

No thoughts were given to any ailing airline out there whose livelihood depends on the daily air traveler.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airport Departure Tax In Colombia posted Tue Feb 22 2005 22:10:48 by Wimpycol
Airport Employees In Multi-Airport Cities posted Mon Dec 11 2006 21:56:56 by Avion346
Shortest International Airport Runway In The US posted Sat Oct 28 2006 20:07:50 by Fll2993
That Fortress Hub Airport Down In Texas... posted Wed Oct 11 2006 07:15:17 by N844AA
New Airport Opens In Tibet posted Mon Sep 4 2006 19:21:23 by 777way
Major Airport Developments In The US posted Mon Apr 3 2006 05:20:35 by IcelandairMSP
Newest Airport/Airline In Japan Starts Today! posted Fri Mar 17 2006 01:50:42 by San747
Most Expensive Airport Tax posted Wed Jan 11 2006 22:35:45 by Mason
Salzburg Airport Bus In Close Encounter With IL96. posted Tue Jan 10 2006 15:33:53 by Beaucaire
Airport Modernization In India Faces Snags posted Fri Jan 6 2006 15:25:16 by Terryb99