Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Coex Lands Without Nosegear  
User currently offlineClickhappy From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 9654 posts, RR: 68
Posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4923 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Just coming in on CNN

Looks like a 1900D

24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21562 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4889 times:

A 1900D is not COex. It's COcon. Just to be clear.

Any idea which Continental Connection carrier this is? There are a bunch.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4773 times:

NTSB said they could move it--should be off the runway pretty soon... Air carriers are running off 13 now...

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4756 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 1):
Any idea which Continental Connection carrier this is? There are a bunch.

Only one fly the 1900....



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineDFW13L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4744 times:

What airport is this going on? None of the messages so far mention where it is!

User currently offlineN766UA From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 8341 posts, RR: 23
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4713 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 3):
Only one fly the 1900....

Um... Gulfstream + Commutair = 2.



This Website Censors Me
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21562 posts, RR: 59
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4701 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 3):
Only one fly the 1900....

Wow, how helpful. Don't even share the name.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineGQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 4701 times:

How in the heck could they land that thing with no nosegear without shutting down the engines?

User currently offlineLincoln From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3887 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4671 times:

Quoting DFW13L (Reply 4):
What airport is this going on? None of the messages so far mention where it is!

Only guess looking at www.fly.faa.gov would be FLL ("General Departure Delays: Due to DISABLED AIRCRAFT, traffic is experiencing Gate Hold and Taxi delays between 15 minutes and 29 minutes in length and decreasing.") but no idea... I flipped to CNN and they were talking about something completely different.

Lincoln



CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 4669 times:

Quoting N766UA (Reply 5):
Um... Gulfstream + Commutair = 2.

yea, I forgot about Commutair switching over a year or so back. So if it's in FLL that would be Gulfstream

[Edited 2005-12-23 22:35:22]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineA330323X From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 3039 posts, RR: 44
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 4496 times:

Quoting EMBQA (Reply 9):
yea, I forgot about Commutair switching over a year or so back.

December 1, 2000. Over 5 years ago.  Wink



I'm the expert on here on two things, neither of which I care about much anymore.
User currently offlineFlairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 4444 times:

It was at FLL...all are ok, but this is just another accident/incident in SOFL this week, so this is getting a little more coverage than usual.

Planes went from 27R to 13 and are now on 9L!


User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 4390 times:

Quoting A330323X (Reply 10):
Over 5 years ago

D'oooh.. Trust me, things are pretty crazy where I am. We don't see Commutair or really have any dealings with them, so I guess time has flown.



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5700 posts, RR: 52
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 4288 times:

Oh wow, after all the recent landing with SWA, Midwest, the lear jet, and now CO every single boutch is going to be reported breaking news on CNN, I find it funny.
Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently onlineJamake1 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1017 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 4057 times:

Here is a news video recorded shortly after the mishap:

http://cbs4.com/local/local_story_357150509.html



United's B747-400. "She's a a cruel lover."
User currently offlineMarkabcan From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 4026 times:

Did the gear collapse upon landing or did it just not extend?

User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 3943 times:

You still have to love just how inaccurite the media came be. The only thing I heard the reporter get right was her name. Crash landing..??(emergency landing) Jet airplane.....??(sorry dear, that's a turboporop) Maybe a problem with the nose..?? (Daaaa!!)


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3861 times:

Quoting Atrude777 (Reply 13):
and now CO

as was said earlier in the posts ia B1900, NOT a Continental Airlines plane but a CO Connection company. Continental Airlines is all Boeing jets, Jet Express is all Embraer jets.....How about not acting like the media posting incorrect or incomplete information.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineTurnit56N From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3828 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 17):
Jet Express is all Embraer jets.....How about not acting like the media posting incorrect or incomplete information.

Actually, it's Express Jet.

Sorry, I had to.  spin 


User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3266 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 17):
How about not acting like the media posting incorrect or incomplete information.

Go onto the the TV station link and watch the report...

They called it a JET.. which it's not.
They called it a BEECH 19... which it is not.
They said it CRASH LANDED...which it did not.

[Edited 2005-12-24 17:26:46]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineAeroVodochody From Czech Republic, joined Feb 2005, 540 posts, RR: 2
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3018 times:

hmmm... the reporter on that video clip seems to think that there could possibly be something wrong with the nose gear, since its facing down and everything? ......I love the media Big grin


Try not to be jealous, we can't all be Czech.
User currently offlineZotan From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 611 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2849 times:

Quoting GQfluffy (Reply 7):
How in the heck could they land that thing with no nosegear without shutting down the engines?

I suppose you have a type rating in the B1900?


User currently offlineC680 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 588 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

Quoting Zotan (Reply 21):
I suppose you have a type rating in the B1900?

Yes, you do.



My happy place is FL470 - what's yours?
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5700 posts, RR: 52
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 1924 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 17):
as was said earlier in the posts ia B1900, NOT a Continental Airlines plane but a CO Connection company. Continental Airlines is all Boeing jets, Jet Express is all Embraer jets.....How about not acting like the media posting incorrect or incomplete information.

I know it is not Continental mainline, but the flying public couldn't give a shit. All they see is CO colors on the plane and the name Continental is on it, so they see it as Continental. I am smart enough to know the difference, flying public does not.

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently offlineTheGreatChecko From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 1130 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 1593 times:

Quoting GQfluffy (Reply 7):
How in the heck could they land that thing with no nosegear without shutting down the engines?

Screw the engines, save your ass!

A landing gear issue isn't that big of a deal, unless you shutdown two good engines early and Vmc roll it into the runway when one engine holds on longer than it should.....

Me...I'd just try to make it as soft as possible and stay off the problem gear as long as possible, then bring it down to the runway, no need to shutdown the engines. They will probably need a teardown anyways....

Sorry, I had an instructor heart attack....

GreatChecko



"A pilot's plane she is. She will love you if you deserve it, and try to kill you if you don't...She is the Mighty Q400"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aircraft Lands Without A Wing? posted Sun Mar 21 2004 12:17:18 by Justplanecrazy
AA New 763 Business Class Without PTVs? posted Sat Aug 29 2009 20:08:20 by RICARIZA
Plane Lands On Freeway - Hit By 3 Cars posted Sun Aug 23 2009 16:34:27 by DTWLAX
DOT Blames Mesaba For ExpressJet/CoEx Nightmare posted Fri Aug 21 2009 08:11:22 by Ssides
I Have Booke An AR Flight Without Paying posted Tue Aug 11 2009 09:17:30 by Qantasistheway
Major Cities Without Hubs posted Thu Jul 23 2009 17:54:19 by DocLightning
Landing Without Clearance (incident) posted Mon Jul 13 2009 11:48:09 by Dr.DTW
Airplanes Without Crashes posted Tue Jul 7 2009 12:30:46 by C5LOAD
Ex-NW CEO Steenland Lands A New Job posted Mon Jul 6 2009 10:34:13 by JSquared
Biz/First Class Without The View? posted Fri Jun 5 2009 08:37:26 by Richiemo