Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Diversions From JFK And LGA Today 12/25  
User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 12
Posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8983 times:

I was checking FlightAware this morning (I do celebrate chrismas but my parents weren't awack yet so we couldn't open presents) and I noticed on the JFK tracking page there was an American 777, American 767-300, El Al 747-400, and a United Airlines 757-200 + the Varig flight from San Paulo stopped in Miami before heading up to JFK. The AA 777 was coming from San Paulo I guess when it diverted to EWR and the AA 767-300 was coming from Buenos Aires. The first flight was AAL950 and the second one was AAL756. The El Al 747-400 was coming from Tel Aviv and was flight ELY3. The United 757 was UAL14 from Los Angeles.

Diversions also went to SWF today. JBU 166 from Portland, JBU98 from Denver, and two American ERJ-135s heading for LGA at 10:50 which I could not find on the arrivals page.

Possibly weather related diversions?

No Vueling No Party
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9450 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8974 times:

Quoting AlitaliaMD11 (Thread starter):
Possibly weather related diversions?

Yup.. weather. Lots of heavy rain headed into the northeast today. Not at all newsworthy ...

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineTokyoNarita From Palau, joined Aug 2003, 570 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8958 times:


KJFK 251451Z 06005KT 1/16SM R04R/0600V0800FT FG VV001 03/02 A2988
KLGA 251451Z 09006KT 1/8SM R04/0500V0600FT FG VV001 04/03 A2987


User currently offlineNIKV69 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8936 times:

Yep, the fog here is terrible, I can't even see the houses on the other side of the block.

User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 8934 times:

Yep, it was weather, in the form of fog. Visibilities (as measured by RVR) have been below CAT-I and CAT-II minimums for a few hours, and have flirted with CAT-IIIa minimums in the last couple of hours. LGA appears to have just gotten worse in the last couple of hours.

KLGA 251451Z 09006KT 1/8SM R04/0500V0600FT FG VV001 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 1/4 SLP113 T00390033 58001
KLGA 251351Z 06007KT M1/4SM R04/1000V3000FT FG VV001 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 1/4 SLP114 T00390033
KLGA 251341Z 06006KT M1/4SM R04/1600V3000FT FG VV001 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 1/4
KLGA 251251Z 05006KT 1/4SM R04/5000VP6000FT BR OVC002 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 1 1/2 SLP115 T00440028
KLGA 251233Z 06005KT 1/2SM R04/3500VP6000FT BR OVC002 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 1 1/2
KLGA 251151Z 06006KT 2SM BR OVC004 04/03 A2987 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 3 SLP114 T00390028 10039 20033 57007
KLGA 251051Z 08004KT 2SM BR OVC004 04/03 A2988 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 2 1/2 SLP118 T00390028
KLGA 251017Z 05007KT 1 3/4SM R04/3000VP6000FT BR OVC004 04/03 A2988 RMK AO2
KLGA 251008Z 04006KT 1/2SM R04/1400V3000FT FG VV002 03/03 A2987 RMK AO2
KLGA 250951Z 05007KT 1/2SM R04/6000VP6000FT BR OVC004 03/02 A2988 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 1 SLP117 T00330022
KLGA 250934Z 06006KT 2 1/2SM BR OVC004 03/02 A2988 RMK AO2
KLGA 250851Z 06005KT 4SM BR BKN004 BKN250 03/02 A2989 RMK AO2 SLP121 T00330017 58008
KLGA 250832Z 05004KT 4SM BR FEW004 BKN250 04/02 A2989 RMK AO2
KLGA 250751Z 00000KT 4SM BR BKN250 04/02 A2990 RMK AO2 SLP125 T00390022
KLGA 250651Z 00000KT 5SM BR BKN250 03/02 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP130 T00330017
KLGA 250551Z 09007KT 6SM BR SCT250 04/02 A2991 RMK AO2 SLP129 T00390017 10089 20039 58005
KLGA 250451Z 00000KT 7SM CLR 05/02 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP134 T00500022 401280050
KLGA 250351Z 18005KT 8SM CLR 07/03 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP133 T00670028

KJFK 251451Z 06005KT 1/16SM R04R/0600V0800FT FG VV001 03/02 A2988 RMK AO2 SFC VIS 1/8 SLP118 T00280022 58002
KJFK 251351Z 05004KT 1/16SM R04R/0600FT FG VV001 01/01 A2988 RMK AO2 SLP118 T00110011
KJFK 251251Z 03004KT 1/16SM R04R/0700FT FG VV001 01/01 A2989 RMK AO2 SLP120 T00060006
KJFK 251151Z 09003KT 1/16SM R04R/1000V1200FT FG VV001 01/01 A2989 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4 SLP120 T00060006 10011 21006 57003
KJFK 251051Z 04004KT 1/16SM R04R/0800FT FG VV001 01/00 A2989 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4 SLP123 T00060000
KJFK 250951Z 04004KT 1/8SM R04R/0800FT FG VV001 00/00 A2989 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4 SLP120 T00000000
KJFK 250917Z 04004KT 1/8SM R04R/0700V0800FT FG VV001 01/00 A2989 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4
KJFK 250905Z 07004KT 1/2SM R04R/0800V1200FT FG VV001 01/00 A2990 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4
KJFK 250851Z 03005KT 1/2SM R04R/1600V5000FT FG BKN250 01/01 A2990 RMK AO2 TWR VIS 4 SLP123 T00110006 58010
KJFK 250751Z 06006KT 2SM BR BKN250 01/00 A2991 RMK AO2 SLP129 T00060000
KJFK 250651Z 07004KT 3SM BR SCT250 01/00 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP135 T00060000
KJFK 250551Z 03004KT 5SM BR FEW250 01/00 A2992 RMK AO2 SLP133 T00110000 10044 20000 57008
KJFK 250451Z 00000KT 5SM BR FEW250 02/01 A2994 RMK AO2 SLP137 T00220011 401280000
KJFK 250351Z 10003KT 5SM BR FEW250 00/M02 A2994 RMK AO2 SLP136 T00001017

User currently offlineCactusTECH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 8737 times:

South African Airways from DKR to JFK went to BOS

User currently offlineBDLGUY From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 194 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 8629 times:

The following airlines were diverted to BDL this morning...


Happy Holidays!!  Silly
John Perrotta/BDL

John A. Perrotta (KBDL/BDL) - Canon 300D/400D & EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
User currently offlineFlairport From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 8446 times:

DIVERSIONS from the DIVERSION KING (myself Big grin)
by airline
AA956 Rio De Jenero-JFK to EWR
AA950 Sao Palo-JFK to EWR
EGF892 CLT-LGA to Newburgh
EFG806 BOS-LGA to Newburgh
EGF886 CLE-LGA to NEwburgh
EGF870 CMH-LGA to Newburgh
song 2054 PBI-LGA to PHL
song 2046 MCO-LGA to BWI
song 2053 FLL-LGA to BDL
song 2017 SFO-JFK to EWR
song 2012 LAX-JFK to EWR
song 2062 TPA-JFK to IAD
song 2048 MCO-JFK to PHL
El Al 3 TLV-JFK to EWR
El Al 1 TLV-JFK to EWR
B6 98 DEN-JFK to Newburgh
B6 174 SJC-JFK to EWR
B6 180 PHX-JFK to BDL
B6 166 PDX-JFK to Newburgh
B6 818 PBI-JFK to BDL
B6 26 FLL-JFK to ACY
B6 61 SYR-JFK to BDL
B6 186 SAN-JFK to LGA
All Nippon Airways 10 NRT-JFK to IAD
Comair 990 PIT-JFK to ABE

User currently offlineAlitaliaMD11 From Spain, joined Dec 2003, 4068 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 8343 times:

Thanks for the list Flairport! If it helps in the future Newburgh's code is SWF.

No Vueling No Party
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9104 posts, RR: 27
Reply 9, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 8243 times:

dang wish i had my car still, would have loved to see B6 at bdl..... and i would have gotten to use my new camera.... o well

Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineJcarv From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 417 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 7649 times:

SAA203 GOOY-KJFK diverted to KBOS.

User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 7557 times:

I was on JBU180 this morning. Lucky me!

After leaving PHX about 10 minutes early, we were descending to JFK with expected arrival time of 5:50 am. Around 5:55 I glanced over at the map channel on the TV and we were pretty far east of JFK over Long Island. Then the captain announced that we were circling because of fog and a problem with "ground equipment" at JFK. He said we would circle for up to 30 minutes and then divert if we could not land. Then 15 minutes later the engines spooled up, we gained altitude, and the captain said we were going to BDL.

I turned to the news channel to see if they had a picture of our plane. Breaking News: JetBlue flight desparately circling JFK is now attemping a diverted landing at BDL.  Smile

After we landed, the captain said he was concerned about worsening weather at BDL and that's why we could not circle JFK any longer. He blamed the problem on the ground equipment and/or fog. The explanations were a bit confusing.

The captain said that 100 other planes were being diverted. That's a quote, he actually said 100. I was wondering if that was really true. At various times we were told that JFK, LGA, and NWK were all closed to landing. The situation was changing from minute to minute, some planes could land, some diverted.

First we got some optimistic reports. We would get back in the air quickly ahead of all the other planes that diverted. I was thinking to myself that there must be 100 other pilots making the same prediction that they too would get ahead of the 100 others. The weather was getting better so the ground equipment was no longer an issue.

At 7:30 the F/O said we were ready to depart, all they had to do was get paperwork from the company and program the computers, not more than 10 minutes needed. Twenty minutes later the captain said we still did not have paperwork and we didn't have a flight plan. That sounded a bit weird to me, but I know nothing about operations.

Anyway, at that point I knew we were doomed.  Sad This was going to be a very long delay of many hours. The weather was much worse than predicted. We can't land at JFK, BDL won't let passengers deplane, we are going to sit.

The captain spent a lot of time at the front of plane answering all questions from anybody who wanted to talk to him. Initially I was grateful that the pilots were keeping us informed about the situtation. But after two or three hours, quite frankly, I wanted to pilots to just shut up and stop telling us what was happening.

Well, it took a long time to get the paperwork and the flight plan. The cockpit door was open the whole time so I could see some of the activity. At one point, the captain had an incredibly long rolled up computer printout that he was reading, and the paper was so long it spilled all over the cockpit floor. He was making a lot of calls on a cell phone.

So we got the flight plan, and now the fog is back is JFK. I heard the phrase "below mins" spoken many times. They said later that the paperwork delay didn't really make a difference, we would have been forced to divert if we had actually left earlier.

The F/O eventually got up and gave us a full explanation of everything that happened from the start of the JFK problem to the present time. She gave all the technical info about RVR's and stuff but, like I said, by that time I really wanted her to shut up.  Smile I was awake all night, a 4 1/2 hour flight, and now we have an extra 5 hour delay.

My brain was so fried after 4 hours of delay that I was staring fixedly at a hot pixel on the TV screen. I was wiped out. The TV didn't help me pass the time. I lost interest in TV and even considered committing suicide by making a bomb threat. OK, just kidding, but if you ever had red eye delayed by 5 hours you might be sympathetic. That's a total of 10 hours in the seat and I wasn't prepared for it.

I want to say the F/A's did a perfect job from the start of the flight to the end when we got to JFK. Never even the tiniest sign that they were less than 100% professional all the time.

And by the way, after finally landing at JFK around 11:00 am, I looked out the window and, guess what, it was foggy. They told us the truth. No lie. Fog.

User currently offlineFutureFO From Ireland, joined Oct 2001, 3132 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (10 years 5 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 6953 times:

Worked a flight this morning 12/25 IND-LGA, we held for an hour and then diverted to PHL. Sked arrival was 0931, we finally arrived at 1630 into LGA after surviving 2 ground stops. Weather was bad, RVR of 600 feet and we need at least an RVR at or above 1000 feet.

Sean from MCO and IND

I Don't know where I am anymore
User currently offlineFlybywire777 From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 67 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 6585 times:

Bobster, I was monitoring ATC that morning and heard JBU180. He was circling for a bit but told JFK approach that he couldn't stay for long and wanted to go to BDL. JFK was a mess that morning. Departures were even stopped. The tower had his hands full moving a ton of planes when they opened up 4R. It sounded like they all were sitting the taxiway with engines off when he told them to move. Most needed a couple of minutes to get going.
Departures were moving before arrivals. Not many landed. I guess only planes with CatII or III could get in. The tower was giving out minimums and rollouts. I don't know how that translates to the capabilities of the aircraft or crew. Can someone chime in with some details of low visibility takeoffs and landings?

User currently offlineEWRATC From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 6203 times:

ATC issues RVR if the vis is below 6000ft. EWR was open the whole time. JFK's RVR equipment was broken early in the morning so the CAT III aircraft had to divert also. LGA had trouble with the approach lighting system later on so thats why they were also diverting. RVR and the Approach lights are all part of the approach and the minimums are dependent on all of the components working. Some aircraft are CAT II and they need the RVR to be at least 1000-1200 depends on the company that seems to be the magic number for CAT II. It sucked to be working because it was Christmas you hope for a nice easy day.

Contact Departure
User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5848 times:

The F/O on JBU180 told us at one point that our plane had the most sophisticated equipment and we could land in zero visibility but we needed "mechanical stuff" on the ground, or without that we needed Category I. Hours later she told us about RVR and said we needed 600 feet. After we landed at JFK, she said the actual RVR at landing was 1800, or three times minimum.

The biggest question on everybody's mind was why didn't we divert to EWR? If people could deplane at EWR at least a few of us could go home instead of sitting for hours. (Sorry for wrong airport code earlier when I said NWK, obviously I meant EWR.) I heard people asking "why not Islip?" and so forth. The main excuse given was many planes were diverting and they had to all go to different airports. There were other excuses also, but I don't remember all of them. I distinctly remember hearing EWR is closed from a flight attendant. I don't recall if the pilots ever said EWR is closed.

Suppose we had diverted to EWR, and suppose there were no gates available? That would lead to a lot of upset passengers who would never fly jetBlue again. So maybe BDL was a better choice for the company, get the passengers far away from the NY area so they would not feel an urgent need to get off the plane and take a taxi. This is just speculation, of course. On the other hand, the captain claimed he had trouble getting a flight plan for BDL to JFK because the company doesn't normally fly that route. That was the part I found odd. How is it we get from JFK to BDL so easily but then it's so hard to get a flight plan from BDL to JFK?

Note: After I posted this, I read the later message saying EWR was just as bad. I was confused by the earlier message saying EWR was open the whole time, which seemed to contradict info received on the plane.

[Edited 2005-12-26 21:18:31]

User currently offlineWerdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 709 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 5839 times:

EWR weather was just as bad as JFK. All local airports near new york city area were not allowing any planes in or out.

User currently offlineEWRATC From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (10 years 5 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 5713 times:

Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 16):

Not true we never stopped landing and the rvr never went below 6500ft. Not enough gates for everybody inbound to NY to land at EWR. Jet blue was the only one who did not have enough gates to accomidate all the diversions.

Contact Departure
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
MKE And YX Today, 12/30 posted Fri Dec 30 2005 22:30:04 by Amhilde
UA Flight From JFK To LGA? posted Fri Jun 17 2005 23:48:41 by Jetblue15
Extending AirTrain Between JFK And LGA posted Sun Dec 19 2004 21:12:22 by Rjpieces
DL Announces CLT To JFK And LGA. posted Thu Oct 7 2004 18:10:52 by Iowaman
JFK And LGA Traffic? posted Fri Sep 24 2004 21:40:32 by Aa777jr
Continental At JFK And LGA posted Sun Aug 22 2004 01:30:52 by TriJetFan1
LGA-BDL Via DCA And LGA Today posted Fri Dec 6 2002 01:41:53 by Pshifrin
Interesting Diversions From JFK posted Sat Aug 3 2002 05:18:10 by B747-437B
United Flights Into JFK And LGA posted Mon Dec 27 1999 18:35:50 by United747-400
DL's Trans-Atlantic Routes From ATL And JFK? posted Sat May 29 2004 21:55:03 by PanAm330