Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Future Of LTU German Airlines..  
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 24
Posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 4221 times:

Could someone enlighten me with details on the current situation with LTU?
The owners REWE seem to get tired of putting money into the airline but is LTU for sale and could Air Berlin buy it to enter the longhaul business???
Also they seem to focus very much on Düsseldorf -why no other airports in Germany?


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDeltaWings From Switzerland, joined Aug 2004, 1294 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4082 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Thread starter):
Also they seem to focus very much on Düsseldorf -why no other airports in Germany?

Well, in the real early days (when still under the name Luft Transport UNION) they were based in FRA, but that didnt last long and moved to DUS because they wantd to be the "national airline" of northern germany (Nordrhein-Westfalen). As time moved on they just stayed there, no real reason to move I guess.



Homer: Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen.
User currently offlineLeskova From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 6075 posts, RR: 70
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4066 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Thread starter):
The owners REWE seem to get tired of putting money into the airline but is LTU for sale and could Air Berlin buy it to enter the longhaul business???

I'm not sure if Air Berlin would really want to get into longhauls - as someone from Hapag Lloyd once told me around the time they were pulling out of that market: why fly a plane for 8 hours on one flight if the profit you make is just a fraction higher of what you make on a 2 hour flight... only that you can do three to four of those in the same time that it takes to complete just one 8 hour flight (and you're just at your destination then)...

Quoting DeltaWings (Reply 1):
they were based in FRA,

Wasn't aware of that... maybe they also left FRA because of LH's ever-growing dominance...

Quoting DeltaWings (Reply 1):
and moved to DUS because they wantd to be the "national airline" of northern germany

They went to DUS to be the "national airline of northern Germany"???

Maybe they'd have been better served by buying a map first - no-one from Northern Germany would consider DUS a part of Northern Germany... we just usually consider it as that town full of arrogant people somewhere over there in the west...  Wink Big grin

Regards,
Frank



Smile - it confuses people!
User currently offlineAirevents From Germany, joined Jan 2002, 884 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 4049 times:

In my opinion they are pretty much without a concept at the moment. A bit of "we try to be a business airline", opening almost daily flights to New York and to China, then again being a low-cost airline, offering "City-Quickies" to a place like Vienna three times a day. That never materialised, as Vienna is quite well-served from DUS. I think they should really make up their mind and find a strategy very soon. I think around Europe, there is no point in trying to compete with Air Berlin and the likes. They should concentrate on long-haul tourist destinations, sell those seats directly as well as through travel agents and tour operators and offer a decent product. Diversification is not always the key...


www.airevents.com
User currently offlinePETER05 From Austria, joined Dec 2005, 18 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3974 times:

I like LTU as longhaul-charter airline. I went to Miami several times with LTU departing at Munich and I am going to do that again. It's one of the cheapest and quickest possibilities to go to Florida from Central Europe.

I think that would be the way to go for LTU.


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7064 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3863 times:

Quoting Leskova (Reply 2):
we just usually consider it as that town full of arrogant people somewhere over there in the west...

 bigthumbsup   rotfl  Good One but you forgot that the people their have a weird sense of humor especially on "Carneval" and drink an awful kind of beer.

Quoting Airevents (Reply 3):
In my opinion they are pretty much without a concept at the moment. A bit of "we try to be a business airline", opening almost daily flights to New York and to China, then again being a low-cost airline, offering "City-Quickies

I have the same impression but I do think, too, that they should not compete with Air Berlin and the likes and focus more on the longhaul market and compete more with Lufthansa. Germany could need a second longhaul airline that gives an alternative to LH. DUS might be the right choice, too.
FRA and MUC are dominated by LH and the area around DUS has the largest population within Germany.
Maybe they could offer code share flights with Air Berlin or DBA. AB or DBA operating as a feeder for LTU´s long haul flights or offer connection flights within Germany and Europe for LTU longhaul passengers that arrived from overseas.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3814 times:

Quoting Airevents (Reply 3):
In my opinion they are pretty much without a concept at the moment. A bit of "we try to be a business airline", opening almost daily flights to New York and to China, then again being a low-cost airline, offering "City-Quickies" to a place like Vienna three times a day. That never materialised, as Vienna is quite well-served from DUS.

I agree, LTU is completely without a concept at the moment. The China flights failed after a short time and the VIE flights were discontinued before they actually started. It is a bit ridiculous to see that, makes me wonder if their network developement department is actually doing some research before opening up/announcing new routes.

Quoting Airevents (Reply 3):
They should concentrate on long-haul tourist destinations, sell those seats directly as well as through travel agents and tour operators and offer a decent product.

I agree again, they were quite successful when they used to be the classic "holiday airline" and before they started experiments like the China flights, etc. They should concentrate again on the market with classic holiday destinations, maybe even discontinue their FirstComfort Class (tourists want to fly cheap in a decent Economy Class instead of paying a few 1000 EUR extra to enjoy a few centimeters more legroom).

Also: They got rid of their 757/767 fleet way too quick. I am still asking myself what was wrong with the Boeings, in my opinion were the 757's perfect for short- and medium-haul destinations and the 767's were perfect for long-haul destinations.

Patrick


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7064 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3791 times:

Quoting Sabena332 (Reply 6):
I am still asking myself what was wrong with the Boeings, in my opinion were the 757's perfect for short- and medium-haul destinations and the 767's were perfect for long-haul destinations.

The A321 was more economical then the 757 for the short and medium flights, the A330 was ordered as a L1011 and MD 11 replacement after the A330 arrived there was no need for the 767 anymore.
Maybe it was a wrong decision since Condor has no problem sticking to their 757s and 767s and the mixed fleet of MD 11s, 757/767s and A330s was too much for LTU to handle.
Last year I read an interview with the Chief Pilot of LTU and he said that they are also considering the A340 does anybody know what had happened to that idea.
I don�t know what use the A340 would have for them the A330-200 is perfect for their longer long haul flights and the A330-300 has enough range to fly to Florida and other destinations within the US and Canada. The A330-200 and A330-300 can do nearly every job an A340-300 can do, the A340-600 would be too large and the A340-500 would not make no sense at all despite they would over nonstop flights to Australia and New Zealand.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineDABTH From Germany, joined Aug 2005, 66 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

Quoting PETER05 (Reply 4):
I like LTU as longhaul-charter airline. I went to Miami several times with LTU departing at Munich and I am going to do that again. It's one of the cheapest and quickest possibilities to go to Florida from Central Europe.

I think that would be the way to go for LTU.

Maybe it is but their service and seating is just awful. Much better to go with LH (also via MUC), BA or AF. Just my opinion


User currently offlineHT From Germany, joined May 2005, 6525 posts, RR: 23
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3637 times:

Quoting Sabena332 (Reply 6):
They got rid of their 757/767 fleet way too quick.

AFAIK switching to an "All Airbus" airline was done (at least planned and the proper contracts made) at a time when LTU was part of Swisssair.
Currently LTU has a cap on the number of aircrafts they legally are allowed to operate, as they received some subsidies a while ago (after 9/11).
The recently delivered Airbuses actually are operated by a Austrian subsidiary called LTU Billa ("Billa" is a famous supermarket chain in Austria).
-HT



Carpe diem ! Life is too short to waste your time ! Keep in mind, that today is the first day of the rest of your life !
User currently offline474218 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 6340 posts, RR: 9
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3568 times:

Quoting Columba (Reply 7):
MD 11s, 757/767s and A330s was too much for LTU to handle.

They had no trouble handling their L-1011 fleet.


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7064 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3492 times:

Quoting 474218 (Reply 10):
They had no trouble handling their L-1011 fleet.

Sure as they operated the L1011s it was for a long time the only aircraft they used but the huge maintenance costs of having this mixed widebody fleet of MD 11s, Boeing 757s and 767 as well as the A330 nearly broke their neck financially.
According to that interview I mentioned above LTU is now looking for as much commonality as possible within their fleet because of the bad experience they had in the early nineties with the mixed fleet.
For example LTU is one of the few airlines where A320/A321 pilots also fly the A330s other airlines like Lufthansa don´t do that. They have pilots flying the A320 family and others flying the A330/A340.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4695 posts, RR: 42
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 1 day ago) and read 3336 times:

I don't think that LTU will be able to compete profitably in the large volume markets like PMI, AGP or FAO anymore - these are the markets, in which carriers which much lower production and distribution cost like AB dominate. However, I can see a niche on short- or medium haul routes in niche markets, which might just fly below the radar of their competitors: smaller Greek islands may be an example for that, routes to Iceland or northern Norway and Finland (like they sporadically already fly) or the new full charter to BEY or LYS.

The times for profitably hauling huge volumes of inclusive tour holidaymakers with widebodies on short- to medium haul flights are unfortunately over, save for a few summer months though. Therefore LTU is stuck with an oversized medium haul fleet of A330's, which are just too big for today's segmented markets.

On long haul, there is a market for a second German leisure airline besides Condor. If the destinations are chosen according to demand from their tour operators or according to the needs of the individual markets, I can see less of a problem in this segment. The A330-200 is an attractive aircraft for that. However, they have to sort out their focus - do they want to serve large metropolitan areas with a schedule, which is attractive to Business travellers (like the JFK route), or do they want to focus on leisure-based niche destinations like CUN, MLE or PMV?

[Edited 2005-12-28 12:08:18]


Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineBA380 From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 1466 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 20 hours ago) and read 3251 times:

I am not sure I agree that LTU is inferior to LH for long-haul.... LH offers no PTVs and is well-known as the worst of the large airlines for Y long-haul, whereas LTU is known as one of the best European charter airlines...


cabin crew: doors to automatic and cross-check...
User currently offlineHT From Germany, joined May 2005, 6525 posts, RR: 23
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 17 hours ago) and read 3164 times:

While this is not exactly "the future", but for tomorrow (29-DEC-2005) there´s a flight LT 5406 HAJ - JED which apparently is a Hadj/Haji flight ...
-HT



Carpe diem ! Life is too short to waste your time ! Keep in mind, that today is the first day of the rest of your life !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Future Of Low-cost Airlines In Europe posted Mon May 21 2001 10:11:07 by Airblue
Regional Airlines RFPs And The Future Of Them posted Wed Nov 15 2006 07:39:34 by Apodino
AA: The Future Of American Airlines posted Sun Oct 1 2006 19:52:50 by CHIFLYGUY
The Future Of Spirit Airlines posted Mon Jun 5 2006 05:21:22 by InTheSky74
The Future Of Delta Airlines posted Mon Feb 20 2006 20:05:34 by GSPITNL
DL And The Future Of Its Fleet (Other Airlines Too) posted Sat Oct 1 2005 17:03:20 by DeltaGuy767
The Future Of Olympic Airlines posted Mon Oct 27 2003 22:06:20 by Greek_fspilot
Song - Glimpse Of The Future Of Airlines posted Mon May 12 2003 12:57:53 by RL757PVD
About The Future Of Airlines In LatinAmerica posted Mon Apr 23 2001 21:16:53 by WiLdmanVzla
The Future Of Luxury Airlines posted Wed Aug 16 2000 22:23:25 by Redwarf