Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
KLM-AirFrance, Does The Merger Effect A/L History  
User currently offlineTom12 From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 1078 posts, RR: 13
Posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2683 times:

Does the AirFrance-KLM merger effect KLM's claim to being the worlds oldest Airline? The reason i thought this is, is was thinking is AirFrance-KLM, a new company or just an alliance? (sorry about my sentance structure i hope i made it clear enough) I realise this question might be a little dated it is just out of general interest

Thanks


"Per noctem volamus" - Royal Air Force Bomber Squadron IX
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4695 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2642 times:

KLM still operates under it's own AOC, so I would say yes.


For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2638 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

It is a new company that oversees both airlines, however I do believe that they are operating relatively independently, with some economies of scale, as well as some reduction in overlapping routes.

Does anyone ever see them losing one of their identities?

(knowing AF it would be KL that loses out there)



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineFlyingdutchman From Netherlands, joined Jul 2007, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2633 times:

Quoting Tom12 (Thread starter):
is AirFrance-KLM, a new company or just an alliance? (

It's not a new company the still are two independent "Flag Carriers"

So the merger will not effect the claim of KLM to by the worlds oldest Airline
in mine opinion.

Regards
Flyingdutchman


User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2550 times:

The takeover effectively ended KLM as an independent operator so they no longer exist as such (which their claim is based on, oldest INDEPENDENT airline).
Strictly their claim doesn't hold true anyway, because the claim includes the use of the name KLM over that entire interval which is false as they operated for a short period during and after WW2 under the title "Dutch government air transport" (or something along those lines).

There are other airlines that can claim a very long heritage, but they've all been taken over, changed names, restarted, etc..



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineJRadier From Netherlands, joined Sep 2004, 4695 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2450 times:

Quoting Jwenting (Reply 4):
The takeover effectively ended KLM as an independent operator so they no longer exist as such

As long as KLM has it's own AOC (wich they have) they are an independent operator, so this claim doesn't really hold up.



For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and ther
User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 18
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Depends on how you define the term... If by independent you mean they aren't on a corporate level they're no longer independent.
It's similar to the claims from Chalks that they're the oldest. According to their logic they are but it's a different logic from the one used by KLM.



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7412 posts, RR: 57
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2342 times:

Quoting Tom12 (Thread starter):
a new company or just an alliance?

AF bought KLM, and formed AF-KLM. It is a company, operating (for the moment) two brands : KLM from the Hub of AMS and AF from the Hub of CDG.

The past "history" of each airline remains the same ... as long as the two brands remain "alive".
I don't think the name "KLM" will disapear to become Air France.
The whole entity could operate one brand called Air France-KLM, but not only AF or not only KL.
The other solution is to drop both AF and KLM and adopt a single common name, but that's unlikely to happen... at least in a near future (maybe when AF-KLM will buy out and merge with DL/NW/AZ ... Then they won't be able to simply add the name of the latest bought airline  Wink ).

Quoting Flyingdutchman (Reply 3):
It's not a new company the still are two independent "Flag Carriers"

You can call them "Flag carriers" if you like it ... AF-KLM is the Dutch Flag carrier and AF-KLM is the ... French flag carrier. But they are not "independent" from each other as the Strategy is decided for the whole group, with specific "missions" or/and market assigned to one or the other brand. Moreover, all the financial results are now published for AF-KLM.


User currently offlineGr8Circle From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 3106 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2330 times:

I think the term 'merger' is a misnomer.....mergers happen when two companies merge their operations to form a new combined entity with a common infrastructure and manpower....I think that's not happened completely in the case of AF and KL....

User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7412 posts, RR: 57
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2321 times:

Quoting Gr8Circle (Reply 8):
I think the term 'merger' is a misnomer.....

The term "merger" is right.
The problem is some people didn't "acept" yet the fact that AF could buy KLM.

Quoting Gr8Circle (Reply 8):
mergers happen when two companies merge their operations to form a new combined entity with a common infrastructure and manpower

That's exactely what heppened. "Air France" & "K.L.M" are just two different brands, as I mentionned in my reply#7.
AF & KL merged very recently, all the job cann't be done in 6 months, but a lot of people from both AF & KL are working on it, with more and more common agencies in the world, one single Station manager for both AF & KL (like in THR, SXM) etc...


User currently offlinePHKLM From Northern Mariana Islands, joined Dec 2005, 1198 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2230 times:

Well, you're right in saying KL/AF is a French company, based in Paris, under French law owning both the former AF and KL companies. There's a lot of legal stuff and other yada yada in the merger involved, about preferential shares held by de Dutch government and the SAK1 and SAK2 foundations.
The company -repeatedly- stated that it is its intention to work with a two-hub system (AMS/CDG).
For more information, see http://www.airfranceklm-finance.com


User currently offlineGr8Circle From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 3106 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2223 times:

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 9):
That's exactely what heppened. "Air France" & "K.L.M" are just two different brands, as I mentionned in my reply#7.
AF & KL merged very recently, all the job cann't be done in 6 months, but a lot of people from both AF & KL are working on it, with more and more common agencies in the world, one single Station manager for both AF & KL (like in THR, SXM) etc...

I stand corrected.....


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Does The HP/US Merger Effect The UA Codeshare? posted Wed Sep 28 2005 00:08:47 by Gilesdavies
KLM After The Merger With AF posted Fri Aug 5 2005 16:22:05 by MauriceB
Why Does QF Want The Merger With ANZ? posted Thu Nov 20 2003 05:17:07 by Brutie
Does KLM Still Operate The 747-200 Freighter? posted Sun Sep 14 2003 18:30:30 by Mozart
When Does KLM Start Flying The 772? posted Sun Jul 20 2003 18:50:44 by KL911
What Does The BA/ KLM Collapse Mean To AA And Onew posted Fri Sep 22 2000 08:16:20 by Waggingtail
Where Does The Air Canada/Canadian Merger Stand? posted Sat Nov 20 1999 15:25:33 by Luftaom
"Fleet Commonality Does Not A Merger Make"... posted Thu Nov 16 2006 02:50:57 by Falcon flyer
Does Daylight Savings Effect Airlines? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 03:33:11 by Fl370
IAD - The Capital Effect? posted Sun Oct 22 2006 04:24:40 by Zsx81