Avi8tir From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 397 posts, RR: 0 Posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1195 times:
I have been thinking about this for a while, and since I experienced it again today, I thought Id ask the question. I own a Breitling Aerospace. It is constructed of high grade titanium. I read years ago that titanium is anti-magnetic. So understanding that, I realized that I could wear it through security. so I tried it out. it worked. I have worn it through every time since without a hitch. 100+ times. its kind of funny sometimes because the person monitoring the detector will often point out to me that I am still wearing my watch in order to remind me that it will set off the machine. I just smile and walk through and I often see a look of disbelief on their face. this raises a question to me about the possiblities of other titanium made items making it through security. perhaps in larger amounts, it would set off the detector. any thoughts on this?
Sinlock From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1559 posts, RR: 3 Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1083 times:
Quoting LMP737 (Reply 1): Along with being very expensive titanium is also very hard to work with. In order to make anything using it you need skilled labor and specialized facilities. Nothing to lose sleep over.
DeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 14 Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1070 times:
Quoting Sinlock (Reply 6): I'll feel a little safer when body scanners start showing up.
I'll feel safer when the US Government allows profiling and we start looking for the terrorist instead of lookign for the weapon and bothering nuns, old ladies, and kids at the security lines (unless of course they are the terrorists then kick the crap out of them.)
"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
JayinKitsap From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 767 posts, RR: 1 Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1052 times:
I heard on the news that at least one airline will not let an unaccompanied minor sit next to any man (I guess is they think they could be a pedophile). So it is OK to use profiling there but not to catch the bad guy boarding the plane?
Cops profile all the time: hot looking cars and junkers get pulled over more often. Why, because they have a high probability of violations. The minivan needs less scrutiny. Why can't the TSA.
Males in their 20's that look scruffy, have wild eyes, and raise suspicion should get more scrutiny. Grannines and older businessmen should get less but still some. Statistically balance your security to the threat instead of being PC.
Cloudyapple From Hong Kong, joined Jul 2005, 2447 posts, RR: 9 Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 1036 times:
I believe the security scanners can be adjusted to various sensitivties to detect different materials.
But hey - a plastic fork or a woman's handbag could be a weapon, should they be banned too? What about mobile phones? They can receive signals and trigger things planted onboard! Ban them! Or you can spend some time to invent a scanner to detect bad guys instead. Stop being ridiculous about security. Many tourists are put off by these over the top so-called "security arrangements". I am one.