Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is It The 747-8?  
User currently offlineDTW757 From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 1567 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5486 times:

Was just wondering and I may have missed it someplace, if anyone knows why Boeing is naming the next 747 the 747-8 or 800? Why not 747-500? The 500 would seem to be the next likely generation. Just curious if anyone knows.


721,2,732,3,4,5,G,8,9,741,2,3,4,752,3,762,3,4,772,3,788,D93,5,M80,D10,M11,L10,100,AB6,319,20,21,332,3,388,146,CR2,7,ERJ,
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDean From Hungary, joined Apr 2005, 216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5474 times:

I'm not sure, but It can be some kind of marketing... To show, this new type of 747 is a rival of Airbus A380-800... Also, why 787-8 is not 787-200? I think it's all about marketing...

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5468 times:

The 747-8 is named to show the technology tiein with the 787.

N


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31012 posts, RR: 86
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5459 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The 747-500, 747-600, and 747-700 (nee 747-X) were all formal design studies submitted to customers. So while they are "available" since none of those programs ever formally launched, Boeing choosing 747-8 is not completely left-field as it:

  • Ties into the 747-800, which is next in the design study lineup (though this one did launch)
  • Ties into the 787 program, both in the "8" and the numbering (787-8)
  • Is a lucky number in many Asian cultures (not that the unlucky "4" hurt 747-400 sales in those cultures)


User currently offlineSWISSY From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 1734 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5425 times:

I am not sure but does it not have something to do with the certification
process?? as the 747-4 frame is certified it would be cheaper for B to get that bird in to the air if the changes are not to great?

Cheers,


User currently offlineJayinKitsap From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 769 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5415 times:

What Randy's Blog Said

So, why call it 747-8 and not 747-500, or -600, or something like that? The simple answer is we decided on -8 because of the connection to so many of the 787 technologies that will be incorporated into this new airplane.


http://www.boeing.com/randy/archives/2005/11/8_and_still_gre_1.html


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31012 posts, RR: 86
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 5402 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SWISSY (Reply 4):
I am not sure but does it not have something to do with the certification process?? as the 747-4 frame is certified it would be cheaper for B to get that bird in to the air if the changes are not to great?

What Boeing calls it probably doesn't affect the certification process, I imagine.  Smile


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5369 times:

I saw the "new airplane" site that Boeing has for the 747-8 and it has a wicked cool photo of a sleeper in it.  Smile I hope that some airline out there will actually do a build-out with sleepers. Hopefully with the 747-8, but the 777 is plenty big enough.

The sleeper is more of a bunk with a privacy curtain, lights, an area for your stuff (books), and a mirror on the side that probably gives the illusion that it's twice as big. Yes, I said "privacy curtain". Sort of like the way they had it for the old prop planes on transcontinental flights.

Of course, it'd cost ya plenty of green, but it'd still be the best first-class configuration out there.


User currently offlineA319XFW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 5368 times:

Anybody know if the 747-8 can be certified under the 'grandfather rules', or will the certification have to be done from scratch (or just from scratch for the new bits?)?

As it will be a new wing, the old rotorburst rules for fuel tanks probably won't be valid anymore, as now you have to have the 'safe zones' for crossfeed and separate tanks, so you can feed the remaining good engines on the intact tanks.
The FAA assumes infinite energy for a rotorburst, so at least one tank would have to be outside the 5° or 7° rotorburst cone of a different engine..


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Is It The US Airliners? posted Wed Nov 14 2001 03:34:54 by SafetyDude
Why Is It Always The Same Answer? posted Sat Jun 10 2006 00:27:43 by JetBlueGuy2006
Why Is It Called The Song Music Trivia Challenge? posted Mon Jan 24 2005 01:11:44 by ISLIPwn
PHX Terminal 2 Why Is It Different Than The Others posted Mon Jan 3 2005 21:51:55 by Hamad
Why Is UPS Repainting A 747 In The Old Livery? posted Tue Aug 5 2003 10:46:04 by Na
777, Whats The Fuss About, Why Is It So Special? posted Sun Jul 21 2002 03:54:19 by Flyboy80
Why Is It That The SE Is So Neglected? posted Sat Jun 15 2002 07:00:36 by Gsoflyer
Why Not Call It The 747-500? posted Thu Feb 28 2002 10:14:53 by 747-600X
Why Is It Always The Captain posted Sat Feb 3 2001 06:16:27 by Critter592
CX888 To Vancouver, Why Is It Delayed For 2 Weeks? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 23:33:57 by Ktachiya