Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Quality Vs Airbus Quality  
User currently offline777rules From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 6 months 4 hours ago) and read 3749 times:

After working at QANTAS for a week on their 737's maintainence thing, I've seen heaps of stripped down parts like the floor panels, and it seems that Boeing quality is not the best, has anyone here seen parts of Airbuses? WHat do you think of the two types' quality?

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSashA From Russia, joined May 1999, 861 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 6 months 3 hours ago) and read 3748 times:

Hah, it must;ve looked like that coz Boeing planes, especially 737s are around for longer than Airbus narrowbodies. WHich version of 737 were u working on?

You can check the neighbouring Airbuses of Ansett, if possible :).

I've seen Aeroflot's A310s and B767 and Boeings generally looked neater. Hmm.. maybe only at a glance but they really did.

Alex A

P.S. BTW, 777Rules, are u aware that Sarah Michelle Gellar has been voted "The World's Sexiest Woman" by readers of FHM (UK men's mag)? :)))



An2/24/28,Yak42,Tu154/134,IL18/62/96,B737/757/767,A310/320/319,F100,BAe146,EMB-145,CRJ,A340-600,B747-400,A-330-300,A-340
User currently offlineMD-11 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 6 months 2 hours ago) and read 3746 times:

I haven't seen actual parts of planes, etc., but I can tell you that when Finnair received their first A321s, they noticed that the quality of work on them was better then on the MDC and Boeing products they operate.

User currently offline777rules From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 6 months 1 hour ago) and read 3746 times:

The QANTAS 737 I worked on was VH-TAV, a -300 made in 1986.

User currently offlineA330 From Belgium, joined May 1999, 649 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (15 years 6 months 1 hour ago) and read 3748 times:

Airbus delivers his planes mostly with a much better fit and finish and provide sometimes better marerials.
Almost every Boeing plane has some lost tool in it, somewhere!
In a recent delivered Sabena MD11, engineers found a flashlight and some books inside the flaps!
Anyways, Boeing is good, Airbus is better.



Shiek!
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (15 years 6 months ago) and read 3747 times:

Here we go again. I love Boeing, but I highly doubt their is truly a big difference between their aircrafts cleanliness and Airbus's cleanliness at the point of delivery. The rest has to do with how the particular AIRLINE maintains their fleet.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineNYC Int'l From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3746 times:

Airbuses are made by thumbless dwarves who live in a city 1200ft. below Hamburg, each plane is hand crafted from a single piece of material and delivered by a trained stork who carefully takes the plane to its final destination.

Boeings are made by huge twelve fingured ogres who throw them together with little care. These ogres live in the momountains of wahsington state. The planes they make are transported by large fire breathing birds who often graze the planes up against mountains as they transport them to their final destinations.

Give it a rest BONEHEAD!!!

Lance, King Of Prussia


User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9533 posts, RR: 42
Reply 7, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3744 times:

Your observations from the sharp end will be interesting to some of us so just carry on with your updates.

If anyone finds a topic boring and doesn't want to see it at the top of the forum, the last thing they should do is reply! If it drifts down and off to a previous page, like most of mine, so be it.


User currently offlineShortstop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3746 times:

Lance, King of Prussia, what the hell are you talking about?

Now, I've flown in many Boeings and only a few Airbuses (will be three in a few weeks). But in the two A320 (or A319 - I can't remember) flights I had, it seemed that the overhead compartments rattled like mad during the landings. I was ready to catch a bag or two if I had to. Anyway, I don't know if this has to do with the airline (America West) or the make. But the Am West 757 I few was a smooth ride start to finish.

John


User currently offlineDw From South Korea, joined Nov 2012, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3745 times:

Actually, I'd agree Shortstop's observation. I've only been aboard an Airbus once-- a UA A320, and while I prefer that plane to a 737 or 757, I did notice a LOT of rattling. At the same time, the interior fit and finish (and its condition) chosen by the airline may have had a lot to do with my positive opinion of the plane.

User currently offlineWingman From Seychelles, joined May 1999, 2315 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3745 times:

I agree with Dw. I prefer the 320 series to the 737 and 757 in terms of passenger comfort. But I haven't yet been on a NG737. Boeing claims in all their press releases that 57 customers have ordered over 1100 of them. They claim a new cabin with a more inviting interior, but members of this forum seem to hate this plane. Reading some of these posts, present and past, I'd think these 57 airlines were blind. Has anyone here flown both a NG and a 320, and if so, was the NG really so awful? I really can't tell much difference between the older 737s and the 320's except that the 320s are naturally newer and therefor nicer to ride in.

User currently offlineBryanG From United States of America, joined May 1999, 436 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (15 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3745 times:

By far the nicest looking (on the inside) plane that I can ever remember being on was a USAirways 737 last year. Guess what - it was a 737-200 much older than I was. It had just gotten a new interior. Just goes to show that inside looks don't really reflect a plane's age, and wouldn't represent it's quality. Southwest's interiors always look shabby, but they're the safest airline in the world.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 747 Vs. Airbus 340 posted Thu Nov 16 2000 21:41:10 by KLMBlue
Boeing Quality Vs Airbus Quality posted Wed Jun 2 1999 11:52:56 by 777rules
Boeing Vs. Airbus: A Different Perspective posted Tue Oct 18 2005 21:20:57 by David31998
Boeing Vs Airbus Orders Per Year posted Fri May 6 2005 03:22:19 by Dirkou
Boeing Vs Airbus Articles posted Thu Mar 3 2005 03:34:04 by Delta15
Airbus And Boeing - Quality posted Sun Sep 19 2004 16:08:23 by A380900
Boeing Vs. Airbus War Getting Hotter? posted Mon Jun 28 2004 19:27:58 by BCAInfoSys
Why People Dislike Boeing Vs Airbus Topics posted Sat May 22 2004 02:31:56 by 747400sp
AirTran - Boeing Vs Airbus A Government Decision? posted Sat Apr 10 2004 21:16:30 by ChiGB1973
NWA - Boeing Vs. Airbus posted Wed Feb 18 2004 16:21:56 by Iluv727s