Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airways 737-200 News  
User currently offlineRyeFly From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1396 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

I read today on Airlinersonline.com today that several 737-200's have now been painted in the new US Airways color scheme (Not Metro Jet). Who would have predicted that one? Thats a very interesting move that I thought would never happen. I can't think of a reason for this can you?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

Something tells me that the merger with United will not go through. I am surprised that they were not painted in MetroJet colors, since the majority of the 737s in the US Airways fleet that are being painted with the new color scheme are the 300 & 400 models.

User currently offlineN-156F From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2103 times:

Painting 737-200s in the new c/s? Well, that seems to spell out the fate of the UA/US merger. One would think that US would have stopped painting its a/c altogether (aside from ones going to MetroJet) if the UA merger really had a chance of making it past the DOJ, since it would be a waste of money as they would be painted in UA colors soon enough.
I was fairly sure the DOJ wouldn't allow the merger to begin with- it looks like the airlines have realized it now too.


User currently offlineTupolev154B2 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1332 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2093 times:

Just saw from the database on this site that US Airways repainted their DC-9's partly in new colors. For example, they painted the distinctive flag on the tailfin and the new company name (US Airways) on the fuselage along with that flag. However, besides that the entire plane has been left as it had originally looked with the mostly-unpainted fuselage and the red cheatline.

User currently offlineDFORD757 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 197 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2080 times:

I think the DC-9s that was half new half old were one that was used on the US Airways Shuttle. They needed them until a good number of the A320s came in. I don't think there are any more DC-9s running the Shuttle however.  

User currently onlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11574 posts, RR: 52
Reply 5, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2076 times:

The thing about painting is that it is required to remove all the paint from jets when doing the D check to check for cracks, erosion, etc. So, when you repaint the plane after the D check, why paint them in the old colors? I wouldn't be surprised if this is what happened.

(Although I have not seen any of these repainted planes.)



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
User currently offlineLindy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2071 times:

They are after D check so they will sell those planes soon. And like DLX said; why not repaint them in new c/s.

Regards,
Rafal


User currently offlineImkeww From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 2043 times:

On the contrary, I think this is a sign that the merger is on the up and up. If US Airways are indeed painting 737-200s in the new scheme after D-checks (and not in *metrojet* c/s), this seems to signify that United wants an easier integration of aircraft after the merger. Why?

Suppose that the merger goes through. No doubt, in the transition period, United will simply put "United" titles over the present US Airways planes. (This is what historically happens in merger transition periods). Now, to main a consistent look of the soon to be completely merged US Airways and accordingly new United, United would like to have as many US Airways a/c as possible look the same with United titles. If there were more red metrojet a/c flying around, the liveries would thusly be more incosistent. This is contingent, however, upon metrojet being rebranded post-merger.


User currently onlineD L X From United States of America, joined May 1999, 11574 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (14 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2033 times:

The repainting in the new blue colors would have nothing to do with the UA merger at all. The point is very simple. You have to repaint the plane. You have three options:

1) Old colors
2) New colors (blue)
3) Metrojet colors (red)

Obviously 1 makes no sense, so the choice is between 2 and 3. Is this plane going to be used on metrojet runs? No? Then paint them blue. That's what happened. Remember, not all the 732s were ever intended to enter the MJ fleet. UA did not fit in the equation.



Send me a PM at http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/sendmessage.main?from_username=NULL
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Airways' B767-200 Destinations? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 16:12:13 by Akeytravel
US Airways 737-400 Interiors posted Sat Apr 3 2004 15:43:05 by Tommy767
US Airways 757-200 On Trans Atlantic Routes? posted Tue Mar 2 2004 11:00:36 by Gilesdavies
US Airways 767-200, How Are They? posted Tue Aug 26 2003 18:23:53 by Kjet12
US Airways A330-200's? posted Thu Aug 21 2003 05:02:22 by N754pr
The Infamous US Airways 767-200 posted Wed May 28 2003 21:29:01 by UA744Flagship
Us Airways 737 Fate posted Sat Sep 7 2002 13:52:17 by Tristar4ever
US Airways 737's posted Sun Sep 9 2001 21:16:38 by Cba
Body Found In Wheel Well Of US Airways 767-200 posted Wed Feb 21 2001 01:15:42 by Airbus380
Airtran Airways 737-200 Service posted Fri Jan 19 2001 02:31:51 by Co LITE