ContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13 Posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 3556 times:
It seems several years after British Midland "The Airline for Europe" went on to become BMI, the company is still struggling to find a true identity. It still has planes painted in a transition livery and continues to shift planes and routes around, seemingly taking advantage of some routes that BA has given up (Saudi Arabia) for example, and trying anything to get a toe hold in the long haul market from Heathrow.
Has BMI given up on fighting for a slice of the transatlantic market out of Heathrow? The Manchester route network seems to be struggling a bit for its flights to the USA.
Joost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3181 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3478 times:
Here you are opening a can of worms
BMI indeed does not seem to have a clear direction. They are a bit of everything; a full-service regional airline, a low cost airline, a network carrier. 3 Different on-board products. A lot of confusion.
I think they missed out an important opportunity a few years ago. They have so many slots at LHR and can fly to so many places in Europe. They have a lot of LCC competition, that's right. But IMHO, they should have had themselves transformed into a certain niche carrier, operating the lowest fares from LHR and becoming a great partner to several Star Alliance carriers, as a feeder. Just look at all S.A. long haul carriers that operate to LHR; an airline offering great connections at an attractive price would be a great fit. But this is not how things went.
FYI, they can not start transatlantic service from LHR due to Bermuda II. They are currently owned 20% SAS, 30% Lufthansa, 50% investment group of Sir Bishop. Rumours are for a long time that Virgin might be interested.
Crosscountry From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 3295 times:
The last thing we need is another carrier offering LHR-JFK
BMI would be better off concentrating on being "An airline for Europe"
I would expect CO and DL to want to muscle in on any open skies agreement, despite the fact it will be difficult to win passengers off the established carriers, VS, BA and AA.
Humberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3204 times:
Quoting Crosscountry (Reply 3): I would expect CO and DL to want to muscle in on any open skies agreement, despite the fact it will be difficult to win passengers off the established carriers, VS, BA and AA.
CO, DL, NW and US will want to serve LHR
CO almost certainly will if they can. They wont have to attarct passengers from established carriers as all they will probably do is move most services from LGW so no new capacity into the LON-US market.
As for DL and NW they will want to serve LHR but may not be able to afford to do so. Unless they start new services (eg Delta LHR-JFK), like CO they wont have to attract passengers from VS/BA/UA/AA as they will just move services from LGW
Finally US Airways. They have moved out of Chapter 11 but may decide they have better things to spend their money on. On the other hand, LHR would allow them to offer connections onto bmi. Again though they would be no new capacity in LON-US as US would just move services from LGW if they started LHR flights
ContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 3065 times:
BMI does not need to fly LHR-JFK. That route is well served by BA, AA, VS, and marginally, by UA. The issue here is that they would need at least four and as many as 7 daily nonstops in this market to be truly competitive. I do not see this happening.
Business Class fares are pricey in this market, but coach fares are generally quite low.
The problem with BMI is the brand. No one has a clear understanding of what it is they stand for. They are not a low cost airline, they are not a full service airline despite the accolades of their business class product. What BMI does is be the "wannabe" alternative to BA and VS.
They also have an ugly livery and a brand name that is not sufficiently British any more, the way it used to be when it was British Midland.