Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ryanair Empty Rows Of Seats  
User currently offlineLhrneighbour From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 36 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6763 times:

Hi there, this is my first Post regarding a matter I can't seem to figure out or find an answer to, so please help me.
On a recent Ryanair (737-800) flight from Stansted to Almeria, I boarded the outbound flight from the rear and everyone was instructed not to sit in the last four rows of seats during take-off or landing. On my return flight I boarded the aircraft from the front and was instructed not to sit in the first eight rows of seats, again during take-off or landing, and when I sat down in the exit seat above the wing, I noticed that the return flight had a series of empty rows at the back too. This is something I can't figure out an explanation for, and this was one of a few queries I had with our flight.
The other two concerns I had became self explanatory (ice on the wing which had to be sprayed with a can of de-icer when we departed Almeria [despite it being 11degrees centigrade] and the reason why they over estimate the flight time by 30 minutes, just like a Pizza Hut delivery, so Ryanair remain "The On Time Airline").
I can only imagine that the empty rows of seats were due to weight distribution, but I'm not so sure. I suppose it doesn't help when I check in over 5kg of excess baggage!


James
32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineJetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2987 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6728 times:

I can only imagine that it was a weight and balance issue.

However these issues are fairly uncommon on such large aircraft.

Who knows??????????



Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
User currently offlineKA501 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2004, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6693 times:

The cabin crew clean the aircraft between flights so less work to do and a reduction in turnaround time!

User currently offlineGofly From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 1727 posts, RR: 38
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6675 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Some good answers in these threads:  Smile

Why Couldn't We Sit In The Last 4 Rows? (by Climb1 May 19 2005 in Civil Aviation)
Why Are Ryanair's Front Rows Empty? (by Ssides Sep 21 2003 in Civil Aviation)

-Gofly  Smile



Living the high life on my ex-Airliners.net Moderator pension...
User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8572 posts, RR: 13
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6663 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hi Lhrneighbour


there was another thread about this recently ... but I have just spent ten minutes on the accursed search engine and failed to find it - I am pretty sure that the answer had to do with a/c trim - bearing in mind that FR don't carry freight and they discourage checked luggage that would mean that the bulk of the onboard weight is the pax and handluggage to their distribution would have a proportionately greater effect on the a/c trim than on a conventional airline with lots of other payload to figure in .


edited to add - seeing the post prior to mine I now know why I got nowhere on the search engine ... it didn't mention Ryanair in the topic for the recent thread

[Edited 2006-01-21 22:25:26]


Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6638 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 1):
However these issues are fairly uncommon on such large aircraft.

Weight distribution can be an issue even on the larger 737-900, even when the flight is at more than 80% of seats occupied. Likewise, the same can be an issue on a 737-300 with about 25 seats occupied. Both observations are based on actual flight experiences where some pax needed to be moved for proper weight distribution.


User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6631 times:

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 4):
they discourage checked luggage

No they don't. They don't make passengers pay extra for checked-in luggage. Passengers can certainly have check-in luggage within the weight limit. If, of course, they go over it, then they rightly have to pay for the excess. I hope they eventually adopt a 'pay-for-check-in-luggage' policy.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineKiwiandrew From New Zealand, joined Jun 2005, 8572 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks ago) and read 6617 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 6):
Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 4):
they discourage checked luggage

No they don't. They don't make passengers pay extra for checked-in luggage. Passengers can certainly have check-in luggage within the weight limit. If, of course, they go over it, then they rightly have to pay for the excess. I hope they eventually adopt a 'pay-for-check-in-luggage' policy.

ooops , my mistake , I'm thinking Flybe , aren't I ?



Moderation in all things ... including moderation ;-)
User currently offlineTheSorcerer From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2005, 1048 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6561 times:

My guess is that it's to do with weight distribution and they have to block certain rows because there is no seat allocation system on FR.  Smile


ALITALIA,All Landings In Torino, All Luggage In Athens ;)
User currently offlineTornado From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 1 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6553 times:

on my last flight with skyeurope they did the same thing, kept the first 4 rows empty. cabin crew said it was a balancing-issue.

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6549 times:

Quoting Kiwiandrew (Reply 7):
ooops , my mistake , I'm thinking Flybe , aren't

Yep.  Smile



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineLehovec From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 296 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6496 times:

Friend of mine is cabin crew for FR and I asked him recently about this matter and he said that they have to do it according to the manual. Reason behind it is balance and fuel.

User currently offlineHS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 6449 times:

This only ever happens on 737s, the A320 is obviously a much better aircraft!

User currently offlineOrion737 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6431 times:

No because TCX were at the same game on a recent flight on a 320. We at the back were asked to shift forward as the flight was only half full and it was to do with balancing us all out.

User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 6425 times:

Quoting HS748 (Reply 12):
This only ever happens on 737s, the A320 is obviously a much better aircraft!

 rotfl  It's always nice when people consider numerous elements before reaching a decision. 'X airline is SOOOO good because they have a GREEEAAATTT livery.'  rotfl 



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3805 posts, RR: 29
Reply 15, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 6329 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 6):
I hope they eventually adopt a 'pay-for-check-in-luggage' policy.

Wouldn't pax then be encouraged to carry onboard (seemingly) all of their earthly possessions, including the provebial kitchen sink? Since it seems that every cubic inch/cm of space for carry-on luggage -- and often more -- is consistently used on full or nearly full flights, where would pax stow their "kitchen sinks?"

If Ryanair could/would be consistent in limiting carry-on luggage to appropriate amounts, I too would give "thumbs up" to reasonable fees (5-10 Euros per piece if within current dimensions/weight allowed for no charge) for checked luggage. Ryanair, after all, seems to take pride in writing the proverbial "how to" book on operating a less-than-no-frills airline; surprised they haven't seen checked luggage as yet another potential revenue stream.


User currently offlineHS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6123 times:

Quoting Orion737 (Reply 13):
No because TCX were at the same game on a recent flight on a 320. We at the back were asked to shift forward as the flight was only half full and it was to do with balancing us all out.



Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 14):
It's always nice when people consider numerous elements before reaching a decision. 'X airline is SOOOO good because they have a GREEEAAATTT livery.'

You people are so gaumless it just takes all the fun out of trying to wind you up.


User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3170 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 6080 times:

A friend of mine told me once being in a MP 742, not fully loaded, that at takeoff from HER on way to AMS, that everybody had to sit up in front too. If the story is true (and why wouldn't it - he knows what's a 747) , then it even matters with such large aircraft.

And even if it saves only a few gallons of fuel, it is worth it. The reason people notice it on FR, is of course because they do not assign seats first.


User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 18, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 5879 times:

Tango-Bravo:

It would result in fewer people taking check-in luggage, while generating revenue which would help in offsetting the cost of the fuel.

It would act an an incentive for people to think 'oooh, do I REALLY need to take that?' If enough people think like this and decide not to take what they don't really need, the amount spent on fuel would be reduced - in time.

It would also mean that costs related to luggage, such as the transportation of it from the check-in desk to the aircraft and then back to the terminal at the destination, would be reduced.

There would be fewer delays as a result of baggage and also fewer baggage loses.

Yes, you'd have to increase your hand-luggage allowance, perhaps by 5 KGs per person, but even then you'd get swifter turnarounds, which would help reduce your airport costs, and fewer delays (...).

If the you suceed in making people think twice about taking stuff they don't really need, then they might take less as hand-luggage as well, which would, again, result in less fuel and thus less fuel costs.

All of those cost savings could be passed onto the consumer in the form of lower prices.

It would also mean that those who take the most pay for it (obviously check-in luggage is normally heavier than carry-on bags). I am all in favour of paying for what you want and not for what you don't - like refreshments and IFE.

An added incentive for taking carry-on luggage and not check-in might be online check-in (where you check-in yourself and print your boarding card): it would mean your time at the airport would be reduced (and thus your stress levels reduced) if you just take carry-on stuff.

A potential downside is a complex system: would one check-in bag be charged the same as a heavier one? Is that fair? How would you know? I guess a one-price-for-all would be the best and most simple way of doing it, with an pre-bookable on-line rate (what, £3? 4.50 EUR?) and an at-the-airport rate (more expensive - £4? 6 EUR?). Needless to say, you wouldn't get a refund if you didn't take the check-in bag with you.

Quoting Tango-Bravo (Reply 15):
If Ryanair could/would be consistent in limiting carry-on luggage to appropriate amounts

Ryanair is, quite possibly, the harshest airline for check-in/carry-on luggage: if it is even slightly over, you'd almost certainly have to pay for it.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 19, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 4990 times:

I think these FR seat threads are going to take over the NW DC-9 / A vs B threads for top spot.


Yay Pudding!
User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 20, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 4747 times:

Quoting Go3Team (Reply 19):
I think these FR seat threads are going to take over the NW DC-9 / A vs B threads for top spot.

*Cough*Bollocks*Cough*

By the way, when are NW's DC-9 machines going?

Which is better: Airbus or Boeing?



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3170 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 4653 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 18):
Ryanair is, quite possibly, the harshest airline for check-in/carry-on luggage: if it is even slightly over, you'd almost certainly have to pay for it.

I found this to be varying from person to person. Last summer, I was traveling on a group of 4 on Ryanair, all without checked luggage. Behind us was a group of 5 or 6 (also Dutch) youngsters, who had way to much luggage - the lady at the check-in desk even suggested that she'd put the luggage on our names, so she did not have to charge anyone for the extra luggage.

In NRN I found another opposite, that our hand luggage was 9.9 kg and 10.1 kg and that she could only accept it if I'd transfer a t-shirt from one bag to the other.


User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 22, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 6 days ago) and read 4638 times:

Quoting Joost (Reply 21):
I found this to be varying from person to person. Last summer, I was traveling on a group of 4 on Ryanair, all without checked luggage. Behind us was a group of 5 or 6 (also Dutch) youngsters, who had way to much luggage - the lady at the check-in desk even suggested that she'd put the luggage on our names, so she did not have to charge anyone for the extra luggage.

In NRN I found another opposite, that our hand luggage was 9.9 kg and 10.1 kg and that she could only accept it if I'd transfer a t-shirt from one bag to the other.

I see. From what my parents, other family and my friends have said, they've always stuck rigidly to it.  Smile But it's good to hear that it does vary (well, from my point-of-view anyway). I never take much anyway - always carry-on - so it wouldn't effect me.



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
User currently offlineAisak From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 763 posts, RR: 10
Reply 23, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4601 times:

Quoting Pe@rson (Reply 18):
It would also mean that costs related to luggage, such as the transportation of it from the check-in desk to the aircraft and then back to the terminal at the destination, would be reduced.

There would be fewer delays as a result of baggage and also fewer baggage loses.

Yes, you'd have to increase your hand-luggage allowance, perhaps by 5 KGs per person, but even then you'd get swifter turnarounds, which would help reduce your airport costs, and fewer delays (...).

That would also mean people having hevier and larger carry-ons that even within the limits (115 linear cms and 10 Kg) means more time for rotations.

Also the Check-in baggage is weigthed with computered balances meaning it's simpler to calculate fuel out of them than carry-ons

Quoting Joost (Reply 21):
In NRN I found another opposite, that our hand luggage was 9.9 kg and 10.1 kg and that she could only accept it if I'd transfer a t-shirt from one bag to the other.

That's silly... but its ryanair policy. Even if they check all the hand luggage and put an OK sticker on them..... You can always open and fill it prior to boarding


User currently offlinePe@rson From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 19233 posts, RR: 52
Reply 24, posted (8 years 8 months 1 week 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4574 times:

Quoting Aisak (Reply 23):
That would also mean people having hevier and larger carry-ons that even within the limits (115 linear cms and 10 Kg) means more time for rotations.

I don't understand your point. More time for rotations = increased aircraft and staff utilisation (and thus increased productivity), or requiring more time on the ground (and thus increased costs, less productivity and generally less efficient)?



"Everyone writing for the Telegraph knows that the way to grab eyeballs is with Ryanair and/or sex."
25 Post contains images Aisak : More time required to board, put stuff up there, inconveniences of bigger carry-ons like "get that backpack out of my face" ... same for getting off.
26 Pe@rson : Hmm. I agree to a certain extent, but I think it's more about altering the mind-set of the passengers. If they have to pay to take carry-on luggage,
27 EZYAirbus : idiots that load them wanna put the bags in the bag then instead of jamming the front hold first
28 JayDavis : I flew on Ryanair recently between LGW and SNN and then from SNN to Liverpool (don't know the code !!) and each time, row two was blocked off, but row
29 Pe@rson : LPL.
30 JayDavis : I thought it might be LPL but wasn't 100% sure. I still wonder why row 2 on the port side was blocked off???
31 N1120A : All airlines do that, not just FR
32 Pe@rson : Yep. This is something which really pisses me off (like always talking about loads and never yields). ALL airlines have BLOCK TIMES. The time stated
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Empty Rows Of Seats On Ryanair Flight. posted Sun Feb 26 2006 18:42:03 by DENplanenut
Ryanair Blocked Rows Of Seats posted Tue Mar 7 2006 02:06:01 by Peterinlisbon
What's This AA Removing Rows Of Seats...? posted Sat Apr 7 2001 03:07:28 by SJCguy
6 Empty Rows In Front Of T/O And Landing In B738. posted Tue Jul 25 2006 23:08:10 by SAA-SAL
Why Are Ryanair's Front Rows Empty? posted Sun Sep 21 2003 17:16:56 by Ssides
Ex Song 757 - 7 Rows Of First!?! posted Sat Sep 16 2006 00:19:16 by Avi8tir
Re: Entertainment Monitors In Front Of Seats? posted Tue Apr 18 2006 03:08:56 by Wardialer
Does BA Upgrade If They Run Out Of Seats In Y? posted Fri Dec 2 2005 02:10:57 by Brokenrecord
Flying Ryanair Tomorrow - Chance Of 732? posted Fri Sep 23 2005 11:02:41 by 7LBAC111