Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Qantas 747 At Stansted  
User currently offlineLHRneighbour From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 36 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

On Thursday night (around 11.30pm on the 19th of January) I arrived back at Stansted, and at one gate stood a Qantas 747-400 full of passengers, presumably waiting for push back. I can't seem to find a thread or link as to why it was there.

I did hear from a friend that before Christmas, Qantas was leaving Heathrow and then getting more fuel at Stansted because of the Hemel Hempsted oil depot incident. When I heard that I immediately dismissed it because it sounded absolutley daft! All airports in the South East are linked to other oil depots and fuel can be got from any number of others.

But having seen a Qantas 747 with my own eyes at Stansted I don't know what to believe. I presume Qantas don't operate a scheduled flight from Stansted?

It did look pretty cool, standing proud amongst the rows of easyJet and Ryanair aircraft!!


James
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDoor5Right From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 707 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3824 times:

Some Qantas and SQ flights have indeed been touching down at Stansted to take on sufficient fuel for the flights to Oz owing to the rationing at Heathrow.


My soul is in the sky...
User currently offlineLHRneighbour From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3780 times:

I thought it would be down to the fuel 'problem' but it seemed odd that it was parked at a gate with the jetty extended. Surely, if it was just 'topping-up' on fuel it would have just pulled onto a stand away from the terminal? Imagine the extra costs involved for the airlines to 'fill-up' elesewhere. I know Heathrow has a pipeline to an oil depot in Southampton too, so I wonder why Singapore and Qantas are "victimised" for their fuel consumption at LHR? Bizarre, but that's life!


James
User currently offlineWhiteHatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3756 times:

Quoting LHRneighbour (Reply 2):
wonder why Singapore and Qantas are "victimised" for their fuel consumption at LHR?

fuel contracts.

Heathrow is not some great socialist fueltopia. Some fuel companies have been more hit than others. It's no different to a fire at a Shell refinery causing problems at Shell garages, so if you have a Shell chargecard for fuel then you can't use it at Esso or BP.

Most airports have multiple fuel suppliers.


User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 7475 posts, RR: 17
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 3681 times:

Quoting Door5Right (Reply 1):
Some Qantas and SQ flights have indeed been touching down at Stansted to take on sufficient fuel for the flights to Oz owing to the rationing at Heathrow.



Quoting WhiteHatter (Reply 3):
Heathrow is not some great socialist fueltopia. Some fuel companies have been more hit than others.

There is still fuel rationing at LHR following the Buncefield fire. While most airlines are understanding this is not true of all;
http://www.flightinternational.com/A...ed+by+Heathrow+fuel+rationing.html
You will see in this article that BAA and not the oil companies are controlling the rationing. I understand that the arguments for placing a higher reduction in supplies to those airlines not based at LHR is because it is those airlines that are suffering the most. So, while the complaining American airlines are only impacted on their US to LHR services, Virgin Atlantic is impacted on the majority of the flights it makes and so its additional costs are very much higher than those quoted by AA and UA.

The same, of course, applies to the other two based airlines, British Airways and bmi. However they are able to avoid the Qantas and South African intermediate stops by 'over filling' their shorthaul aircraft and taking up a full fuel allocation on long haul aircraft. Although this might seem to be 'unfair' think of it another way. They are having to fly into LHR around 20 per cent of all the fuel that their LHR fleets use. So again the increased costs that AA and UA are complaining about are just small change to the costs in absolute terms that the three LHR based airlines are experiencing even though those costs are a smaller proportion of their normal total LHR fuel bill.


User currently offlineSQNo1 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 687 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3616 times:

Quoting Door5Right (Reply 1):
Some Qantas and SQ flights have indeed been touching down at Stansted to take on sufficient fuel for the flights to Oz owing to the rationing at Heathrow.

Although I am not too sure about QF, SQ 317 and SQ 321 are now going non-stop to Singapore, SQ 319 goes non-stop on FRIDAYS only, on other days the flight makes a fuel stop in FRA.

http://www.singaporeair.com/saa/en_U...VDYn4FLRnkx!-1731528879!-924968900


User currently offlineCalAir From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 298 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

Could it have been a cruise charter?


British Caledonian...we never forget, you have a choice
User currently offlineAussie747 From Australia, joined Aug 2003, 1163 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 3433 times:

Here is the timetable for QF2

QF 2
---------------------------------------------------------------
BRD TIME T D/I OFF TIME T D/I FLY/GROUND EQP E
LHR 2145 4 D STN 2230 D :45/ :55 744 E
STN 2325 I BKK 1730 # 1 I 11:05/ 1:20 744 E
BKK 1850 # 2 I SYD 0740 * 1 I 8:50 744 E
---------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL FLYING TIME LHR - SYD 20:40
TOTAL GROUND TIME LHR - SYD 2:15
TOTAL JOURNEY TIME LHR - SYD 22:55
---------------------------------------------------------------
CLASSES
LHR-STN F A J C D Y B H K M R L V S N Q O


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why So Many Qantas 747 At LAX? posted Thu Dec 1 2005 19:23:29 by Boeing 747-311
Qantas 747 At Bangkok posted Thu Oct 14 1999 19:46:02 by Speedbird1
Qantas 747 Surrounded By Cops At LAX posted Mon Aug 14 2006 22:30:18 by Freakfor747
Korean Air 747 Cargo Crash At Stansted in 1999 posted Wed Nov 9 2005 22:18:08 by Drinkstrolley
Qantas 747-300 At Nairobi? posted Wed Jun 15 2005 13:41:43 by PM
Qantas And NW 747's At ONT posted Tue Feb 26 2002 00:51:48 by Matt D
Qantas 747-400 At SKG posted Mon Aug 27 2001 01:04:54 by OlympicEagle
Qantas 747-400 Makes Emergency Landing At Bangkok posted Fri Feb 16 2001 13:02:10 by Singapore_Air
747 Crash At Stansted! posted Wed Dec 22 1999 20:19:50 by Kaitak
VIP 747 At Hamburg posted Fri Oct 27 2006 18:49:55 by DID747