Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
P180 Project Only For Corporate Airplanes?  
User currently offlineJoeCattoli From Italy, joined Aug 2005, 569 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 6 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 2174 times:

http://www.airliners.net/info/stats.main?id=295

I read some information about this airplane

http://www.piaggioamerica.com

and if everything is true it is really an astonishing airplane with propeller fuel consumes and nearly jet speeds...
Don't you think it could be possible to use such a design for a bigger airplane even with a long range to cut the costs of the airfares due to the big fuel savings?
Any comment is welcomed!
Ciao
Joe

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJoeCattoli From Italy, joined Aug 2005, 569 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2105 times:

no ideas???
Ciao
Joe


User currently offlineDoug_Or From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3402 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 2096 times:

Q400

filler filler

Anyway, the p180 is no poor mans anything. Between the high aquisition costs and maintance it is all the expense of jet without the prestige (hence why you don't see so many around).

(btw, bumping your own thread is considered rude in most internet forums)



When in doubt, one B pump off
User currently offlineJoeCattoli From Italy, joined Aug 2005, 569 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2028 times:

It may cost the same as a jet but all the money will come back on the fuel savings.... don't you think?
Maybe a bigger airplane could be used by a new intelligent low cost airline...

(Anyway... I will try to not rebump my own threads even if without doing it I wouldn't have seen your answer but you are right it's not exactly elegant.)
Thanks
Ciao
Joe


User currently offlineTexan From New Zealand, joined Dec 2003, 4274 posts, RR: 52
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2003 times:

The Piaggio is a neat airplane: we see a couple per month. It works well for a business airplane, but it would be difficult to adopt this design to a much larger commercial aircraft. If you are talking regional prop similar to the Q200 or Q300, there remains the possibility that it could work. However, that would mean more than doubling the length of the aircraft which would add more weight; adding more cargo room which would add more weight; accounting for the added seats and passengers (more weight again); and other improvements to the airframe and systems. This would require a more powerful powerplant, one which is likely not yet in production or cannot be fitted to the Piaggio's design. The max weights on the current Avanti model, even translated into an 80 foot long airframe, would not be nearly enough to sustain commercial use.

The other difficulty comes in receiving enough of a response from airlines to launch the product. Couple of factors working against them. There does not appear to be a huge market for turboprops right now, although the tide could be turning. If the market does turn, there are established airframes available that fill the void very capably. Plus, with the lackluster sales of it on the business market, the company is not in a strong market position to create and market a new commercial airplane.

I like the Avanti. It is a neat, fun airplane for light business use. For commercial use it would basically have to be a completely new design. Therefore it is highly unlikely that the Avanti will be developed into a commercial airplane in the forseeable future.

The Q400 is receiving some looks from airlines looking to reduce fuel costs on regional routes, but even it's sales are not great. That might change in the future, though. Check out the information on Bombardier's website about it Smile

Texan



"I have always imagined that Paradise will be a kind of library."
User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1942 times:

Boeing and Douglas both tested unducted fan engines in the 1980s. Unfortunately, low industry interest and design limitations led to the shelving of the projects. Boeing used a 727 and Douglas used a DC-9 variant. Due to the size of the propellers required, they were only really usable on rear fuselage mounted engine designs.


"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlineJoeCattoli From Italy, joined Aug 2005, 569 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1884 times:

Quoting Texan (Reply 4):
For commercial use it would basically have to be a completely new design.

That was exactly what I was thinking about... But you may have seen the reason:

Quoting Texan (Reply 4):
There does not appear to be a huge market for turboprops right now, although the tide could be turning. If the market does turn

...it could be a good idea I think... I think this revolutionary design could be very successful even if transposed in a bigger design.
Maybe if Piaggio would try it could be successful but perhaps it is still a too risky bet.
Thanks
Ciao
Joe


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Runway Removed At CNS?(only For Those Who Care) posted Mon Aug 21 2006 05:11:22 by Fbm3rd
Cash Only For DL Tickets? posted Wed Aug 10 2005 00:04:06 by DeltaFFinDFW
Boeing New Tech. For Moving Airplanes On Ground posted Tue Aug 2 2005 01:52:47 by United787
Why Advertise Only For Upper Classes? posted Mon Mar 21 2005 23:24:51 by RootsAir
Help! Why N For American Airplanes? posted Sun Jan 9 2005 17:00:05 by Lamedianaranja
Zero-G Only For Astronauts? Not Anymore... posted Thu Nov 25 2004 00:21:40 by KFLLSpotter
AirTran-credit Cards Only For Alcoholic Bevs! posted Wed Jun 16 2004 00:27:23 by NYCTZ
"These Connections Only For Airliners.net Members" posted Thu Jun 3 2004 22:39:06 by Ahlfors
Only For Kai Tak Lovers... posted Fri Apr 30 2004 10:57:09 by Soaringadi
SFO Runway Project - Dead For Now? posted Mon Apr 28 2003 19:15:04 by FATFlyer