Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Gerald Arpey Speaks Out Against Ch 11 Law!  
User currently offlineNWDC10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 10 months 17 hours ago) and read 2114 times:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk./business/story/0,,1696991,00.html Robert NWDC10

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAJMIA From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 734 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 12 hours ago) and read 2047 times:

Nice article. Arpey makes a lot of good points, but it obviously did not get much ink as it came out last Sunday and this was the first I had heard of it.

It shall be interesting to see how things go with all these newly Ch 11 cost gutted airlines in the marketplace.

AJMIA



Lady it's a jet... not a kite.
User currently offlineLawnDart From United States of America, joined May 2005, 972 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 6 hours ago) and read 1945 times:

A little nit-pick...the guy's name is Gerard Arpey.

One quote attributed to him: "companies can legally renege on their commitments to repay money or meet the terms of their contracts," says all. Companies, and not just airlines, use the Ch11 process to legally renege on their commitments.

Major changes would need to be made in Ch11 law to disallow that from happening. As it stands, however, Ch11 benefits not only the corporation undergoing reorganization, but in many cases the creditors as well (usually lenders), so I don't expect those major changes to be forthcoming.

He fails to note that Ch11 is also a process that can, in fact, force companies under reorganization to re-commit to their obligations. The corporation needs to present their case to a judge, and the creditors have the same opportunity. Sometimes, the judge sides with the creditors; in the case of commercial aviation, you have many examples of that happening, some very recent.

Another quote: "Chapter 11 is used to perpetuate capacity that has failed." Not always. It isn't the capacity that has failed, but usually the management of that capacity. UA capacity in ORD is viable (it also competes with AA...hmm...), as is its capacity in many other markets -- including Asia (which AA wants...hmm, again...).

Looking into a crystal ball, their may come a time when AA is forced to attempt a reorganization of it's debt (they almost had to a couple of years ago, before DL and NW entered CH11). I would be very surprised to see Gerard Arpey suggest to the creditors, and his own board of directors, that AA should shut down instead of putting up a good fight and salvageing the business.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will UA Ever Get Out Of Ch.11? posted Sat Jun 5 2004 02:52:04 by Ua777222
Mr John Leahy Speaks Out About Airbus. posted Wed Nov 15 2006 13:58:59 by WINGS
Falcon Air Express Files Ch 11 posted Thu May 11 2006 23:46:34 by LatinAviation
Gemini Air Cargo-CH 11 posted Thu Mar 16 2006 06:32:58 by PhilSquares
Aloha Emerges From Ch. 11 Today (2/17) posted Fri Feb 17 2006 05:33:26 by Aviacentre
UAL To Pull Out Of Chapter 11 In February posted Sun Jan 22 2006 01:52:44 by BA747
Aloha Cleared To Exit Ch. 11 posted Wed Nov 30 2005 07:56:25 by Scotron11
Has Any Airline Been Able To Get Out Of Chapter 11 posted Wed Sep 28 2005 03:04:32 by BA747
NW Ch. 11 Exit Financing (Possibility) posted Fri Sep 23 2005 20:25:37 by NASOCEANA
Boyd: Airline Ch. 11's Myth Vs. Fact -Please Read! posted Mon Sep 19 2005 23:03:39 by PSU.DTW.SCE