Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How About A Non-military C17  
User currently offlineFlybynight From Norway, joined Jul 2003, 1031 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2720 times:

I read that Boeing might shut down the production of the C17 after the 180 US military production has ended.
I wonder if a cargo or maybe even a passenger version makes any sense (probably cargo version more than a passenger version).


Heia Norge!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAvianca From Venezuela, joined Jan 2005, 5934 posts, RR: 40
Reply 1, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2710 times:

Quoting Flybynight (Thread starter):
I read that Boeing might shut down the production of the C17 after the 180 US military production has ended.
I wonder if a cargo or maybe even a passenger version makes any sense (probably cargo version more than a passenger version).

there are still to many IL76 arround that you can charter for cheap... so I personally do not see any chance for a cargo version of the C17

regards
Avianca



Colombia es el Mundo Y el Mundo es Colombia
User currently offlineCrjflyer35 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 668 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2710 times:

Never thought about the possibility of one of those beasts going into the civilian sector. I doubt any cargo airline out there (UPS, FedEx, etc, etc) would go to a 17 in my opinion, only because they already have the aircraft that will carry more cargo farther (MD-11, DC-10, 747, DC-8). The C-17's big selling point is it's STOL capabilities, which I doubt FedEx is going to need anytime soon. (Have you seen the number of C208's running around with FedEx paint jobs? LOL)


Ok, wait for the RJ to pass, cleared to push tail south Mike, and you're cleared to spin #2 in the push.
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 60
Reply 3, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2680 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR




There's some good BC-17X information here.




2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineLincoln From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3887 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2662 times:

All I can say is my dad's company would love the prospect... A very significant portion of his division's business is due to the C17, and he is afraid of what will happen if C17 production is shuttered.

On the brighter side, it did make him think twice about shelling out $80,000 for a country club membership, so...

Lincoln



CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 26128 posts, RR: 50
Reply 5, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2639 times:

The C-17 will never become attractive to commercial customers based on its very excessive cost. With a price tag over $250 million a cargo airline could get significantly more bang for their buck via existent commercial designs.

As far as oddsize loads, as mentioned in prior post there are very reasonable leases available on Russian types available on the market.

Several years back I took part in an airline presentation in Long Beach. It became very clear that unless Uncle Sam was willing to extensive subsidize the operations of a commercial C-17s, the type really did not have a business case for airlines.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2616 times:

It's built to haul an all up M1 Abrams in and out of a 5,000 foot field. You don't need a floor and a ramp like that to carry broccoli or DVD players.

Anyway, the time to start thinking about what to do with the C17 outside of military applications was fifteen years ago.

The building is probably, and the tools inside it are for sure owned by Uncle Sam, including what was the largest Drivematic machine in the world at the time. Boeing had no proprietary interest in the program as none of their money was on the line. Boeing's interest in the program was only in milking out every nickel from the order book, and not developing or promoting what they bought down in Long Beach.

Building heavy aircraft is like a lot of other technology and resource dense enterprises-it is far easier to start with a going operation than to build it from the ground up.

It is common in such industries to buy up and idle potentially competitive production facilities, because it raises the bar for any potential entrants in the market. Douglas was on the market, had been offered to Taiwan, and others may have been interested. We see such things in the midwest, as the larger meatpackers buy up and idle productive capacity as a bar to entrance of local folks when they get too big for their britches. One of my clients did this in a specailized metalworking trade.

When the order book runs out and the place is turned into golf condos, the expertise and infrastructure that could support heavy aircraft manufacturing in the area will be long gone.

It's quite clear that the reason they bought Long Beach was to make damned sure that heavy jets were not built anywhere in this country but north of the Columbia River.


User currently offlineGentFromAlaska From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3256 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2532 times:

Although the C-17 is a multi use cargo and troop carrier. It's primary mission is a flying hospital.


Man can be taken from Alaska. Alaska can never be taken from the man.
User currently offlineBhill From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1020 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2314 times:

yep...sign me up. I took a MAC flight from ATL to SEA in the mid 80's fo $5. Food was'nt all that great..but it was a cheap non-stop....


Carpe Pices
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NH, How Many Non-aviation Fans Know About It? posted Thu Mar 17 2005 23:19:57 by Ktachiya
Nice TK 332 Interiors, How About 340s? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 03:11:56 by TK787
Question About Non-Reving On UA? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 02:29:08 by Malaysia
How About This View... posted Thu May 25 2006 09:17:06 by DL Widget Head
How About Some Odd Flight Delays?... posted Tue May 23 2006 17:01:36 by Ulfinator
Forget Retro Jets: How About Retro Flights? posted Mon Jan 30 2006 00:15:40 by Matt D
How About Reverse Engineering An US Airline? posted Sat Jan 21 2006 05:16:55 by Malaysia
PDX Area A.netters: How About A Meet? posted Fri Dec 23 2005 21:10:38 by S12PPL
How About A Country Prefix Re-assignment posted Fri Jul 8 2005 14:00:58 by Birdwatching
How About A Classic Airline Or Flying Museum? posted Fri Jul 1 2005 16:44:51 by JAM747