Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin's Chicago Service  
User currently offlineJumboClassic From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 315 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1189 times:

I have noticed recently that the daily VS 742 flight to ORD has been changed to A343 (the aircraft that they originally started the service with last year). Does anyone know the reason for that? Not high enough loads to support a 747?

Thanks.
Jumbo

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKUGN From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 615 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1133 times:

They used to advertise service to ORD on local radio, and I don't hear them anymore. Btw, the commercial was awful.

I've seen at ORD Virgin 742 lastr month, so this is something very new.


User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1123 times:

I was curious about that too. I asked at the ORD ticket counter when a friend of mine checked in for the flight. i was told that the aircraft was needed when Virgin started the LGW-LAS twice weekly service. In addition the other 5 days of the week is new SFO-LGW service. I was told all those flights were 747. But again who knows. However, when my friend came over on Virgin to ORD he said the flight was less than 50% full. Her said the same was true on the return from ORD-LHR. I find all this quite interesting as it is the peak summer travel season and all the planes are said to be full. So who knows what the real truth is.

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4445 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1099 times:

I don't think that 747-200 operate into LAS for Virgin. I believe it is a 747-400. So, if I am correct the -200 would not be need for that route. Possibly another one?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlinePresRDC From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 652 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 1090 times:

I am scheduled to fly Virign's ORD service in two weeks. I was told it would be a 747-200, but I guess I would not be notified if they made a change.

User currently offlinePresRDC From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 652 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1083 times:

I just checked with Travelocity.com and the flights that I am scheduled to take have been changed to an A340-300.

User currently offlineJumboClassic From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 315 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1085 times:

In two weeks, Aug 3rd, the ORD-LHR flight is scheduled to be A343. Interesting...

Do you know that Balkan Bulgarian is advertising $490 SOF-JFK round trip via LHR with Virgin (for the LHR-JFK flight)? Maybe they should offer the same for SOF-ORD.


User currently offlineContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1073 times:

Virgin wants a second LHR-ORD flight so that it will improve its competitive
position against AA, UA, and BA, all of whom have multiple flights throughout
the day to Heathrow.

I wouldn't think VS will drop the route. It's valuable. The A340-300 is a newer
plane and perhaps they are tinkering with the equipment to accelerate the
aircraft refurbishment plan they apparently have fallen behind on.

Personally, I'd rather be in an A340 to ORD than a second hand 742.

ContinentalEWR


User currently offlinePresRDC From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 652 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 1045 times:

I've noticed that the times for Virgin's Chicago service are not that great. The flight leaves LHR at 10:30 am and get into ORD at 1:10 pm local time. The return flight leaves at 5:00pm, which must make it harder to attract business people who are more likely to want to maximize their work time. Although they are likely constrained by gate and slot availability at both airports, it seems that the flight would more successful if it left Chicago at around 7:30 pm (the same time as the earliest evening JFK-LHR runs) and left LHR at around 2:00 pm. That way, someone could work a full day in Chicago or work a half day in London. I would agree that Virign might be more attractive to business travelers if they had a second daily flight.

Just my thoughts on the apparently light load factors.


User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1095 posts, RR: 13
Reply 9, posted (13 years 9 months 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 1016 times:

LHR-ORD is a route that is flown with a variety of aircraft. Earlier on in the year I was in ORD for two days. One day they flew in G-VPUF, the second day they flew in G-VSKY. So the schedule changes all the time on the ORD route. This happens on the IAD route aswell. The 744 is flown in 3/4 of the time, the 742, the other 1/4 of the time. VS has also started LHR-DEL service. Sometimes that is a 742, sometimes a 744. So this may also mess up the LHR-ORD route aswell. Don't forget that planes are slowly being painted into the new c/s so some substitutions of different planes will take place on some routes. For instance, temporarily, it looks like a 742 has been deployed on one of the LHR-JFK routes. So the schedule on LHR-ORD is always subject to change.


NO URLS in signature
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Did TWA Boost Chicago Service In 1986? posted Tue Aug 8 2006 03:08:20 by Eastern1985
Virgin Atlantic Service To Nassau...? posted Mon Jun 27 2005 14:44:42 by TransIsland
Virgin A380 Service To Orlando (MCO) posted Sun Jan 2 2005 00:12:47 by Oceanic
Impressed By Virgin's Ground Service! posted Tue Aug 31 2004 05:40:54 by JBLUA320
Virgin Atlantics Service? posted Tue Mar 30 2004 07:57:56 by Cbphoto
How Is Virgin's LAS Service Doing? posted Wed Nov 21 2001 23:13:41 by Capt.Picard
Is The Virgin Boston Service Moving From LGW2LHR? posted Thu Nov 1 2001 20:39:02 by LGW
Virgin Atlantic Service posted Fri Oct 26 2001 22:34:48 by Tbone202
Virgin's New Service To Toronto Today! posted Wed Jun 13 2001 02:23:26 by Watewate
Virgin Shanghai Service posted Thu Jun 3 1999 18:11:47 by Nils Westwood