STT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16260 posts, RR: 52 Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2175 times:
I just checked and your right, it looks like Aguadilla is B6's next destination from EWR.
PanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2601 posts, RR: 10 Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2095 times:
Man are they dropping hints lately. Putting up IAD-LAS on the routemap, and leaving BQN on the EWR list. Either somebody is purposely slipping, or things are a mess at wherever this stuff is done . That said, why is IAD-LAS only on there one way?
Lightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 10682 posts, RR: 100 Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 2048 times:
Quoting PanAm330 (Reply 3): Man are they dropping hints lately. Putting up IAD-LAS on the routemap, and leaving BQN on the EWR list.
Interesting... After FLYI's demise, LAS-IAD was one route where B6 did the groundwork and would have seen the loads. Lets see with BQN...
As to EWR-BQN... I see the MCO route coming soon. I guess those former US air force runway is going to see good use. Although, seeing a cesna on those old hotpads might be amusing.
I'm only seeing 4 flights (peak) a day at the airport!
CO: 1
B6: 1 soon to be 2 (and MCO makes 3, IAD 4?)
"MN aviation" 2 flights/day (only Mon, Thur, Fri, Sun) http://www.flytoaguadilla.com/aereas.asp
And yet that runway is capable of handling about anything... Looking from google earth it has a nice taxiway setup and everything. What's the general aviation traffic like?
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 1958 times:
EWR-BQN is via MCO.
IAD-LAS is via LGB.
It's just a way to increase revenue on the flights and perhaps test the water indirectly. I have heard of no plans to launch non-stop flights.
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
InTheSky74 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 546 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1901 times:
Actually, if you click on "nonstop" it still shows IAD-LAS.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1787 times:
Quoting InTheSky74 (Reply 8): Actually, if you click on "nonstop" it still shows IAD-LAS.
That's simply an error on the route-map. IAD-LAS isn't flown non-stop. I wish it was, though!
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
PanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2601 posts, RR: 10 Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 1732 times:
Quoting JetBluefan1 (Reply 9):
That's simply an error on the route-map. IAD-LAS isn't flown non-stop. I wish it was, though!
You think the route map people would just draw in a specific line between two cities, and just say, "Oops!"? I don't. And no kidding they don't fly it non-stop- not yet at least.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 1713 times:
Quoting PanAm330 (Reply 10): You think the route map people would just draw in a specific line between two cities, and just say, "Oops!"? I don't.
Um...yes. This is simply an error on the route map designer's part. It's no more than that. JetBlue does not fly IAD-LAS. They have not announced anything yet. They wouldn't put that line there just because they are "planning" on it. Do you really think B6 would reveal its intentions before a press release?
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
PanAm330 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 2601 posts, RR: 10 Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1620 times:
Quoting JetBluefan1 (Reply 11): Um...yes. This is simply an error on the route map designer's part. It's no more than that. JetBlue does not fly IAD-LAS. They have not announced anything yet. They wouldn't put that line there just because they are "planning" on it. Do you really think B6 would reveal its intentions before a press release?
Most people (read: not a.netters) would never notice such an occurrence, and those who do wouldn't think anything of it. It has nothing to do with intentionally revealing their future route plans- it was simply an error on the drawer of the map. Whether or not it will be announced in the near future remains to be seen, but the A320s have to go somewhere.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1620 times:
Quoting PanAm330 (Reply 12): Most people (read: not a.netters) would never notice such an occurrence, and those who do wouldn't think anything of it. It has nothing to do with intentionally revealing their future route plans- it was simply an error on the drawer of the map. Whether or not it will be announced in the near future remains to be seen, but the A320s have to go somewhere.
I completely agree. And I personally think IAD-LAS would be a great route for them to fly.
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 15, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1598 times:
Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 14): It happened with FLL-OAK. Put on the route map about a week before the PR. It happens.
Ah, thanks for catching that MAH4546. But IAD-LAS has commonly been misplaced on the route map before and...nothing. But one can only hope, right?! BTW, FLL-OAK has been performing really great from what I've heard.
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
JetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 4 Reply 16, posted (7 years 3 months 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1583 times:
Quoting JetBluefan1 (Reply 11): Um...yes. This is simply an error on the route map designer's part. It's no more than that. JetBlue does not fly IAD-LAS. They have not announced anything yet. They wouldn't put that line there just because they are "planning" on it. Do you really think B6 would reveal its intentions before a press release?
Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 14): It happened with FLL-OAK. Put on the route map about a week before the PR. It happens.
Exactly what I was gonna say, B6 put on OAK-FLL like a day before they announced it and then the following day it came out in the PR. So you never know about that so don't jump to conclusions that they won't do it. LAS-IAD would be great though.
When you look at EWR-BQN, no matter what date you put in, they show nothing, I guess they still need to plug it in, also they still have IAD-SMF on the drop down menu but they discontinued that route last month.
Finally on the city info with the pictures, they don't add city info like what to do east and stay, only for older cities and ones that are part of jetBlue Getaways but most say nothing (Like they still don't have SJC info up there and they launched that June 10th 2004. I have even emailed them about it and they just said they forwarded it to the website designers or something like that and no response after that and seems they don't want the feature on the website they made to work). They also have no picture for EWR AUS RIC BDA.
JetBluefan1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2785 posts, RR: 15 Reply 21, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1465 times:
Quoting Icebird757 (Reply 19): Sorry but we do not have any flights like that. There is flight 308 which goes IAD-OAK via LGB but no IAD-LAS via LGB.
I meant via LGB as in a connection. You can fly IAD-LAS but only if you connect at LGB. Sorry for using the wrong word
JetBluefan1
Most people on a.net hate JetBlue. Get used to it.
A3B6NY From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 6 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1363 times:
Sorry rampero (NO PSE) LOOK CONTINENTAL PSE TO EWR 38% LOAD FACTOR.
JetBlueAtJFK From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 1687 posts, RR: 4 Reply 23, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 1329 times:
From: IAD To: LAS
Depart Arrive Flight # Freq. Stop/Via
7:20a 1:15p 311 / 282 D LGB
2:25p 7:05p 308 / 286 D LGB
From: LAS To: IAD
Depart Arrive Flight # Freq. Stop/Via
5:50p 5:05a 285 / 255 D LGB
7:45p 5:05a 287 / 255 D LGB
They are both via LGB.
--
Anyway I think and IAD-LAS route would also be good because DH operated it and that is the first western city they went into and they never really pulled out of it, just pulled out as a company from everywhere. That would be nice along with IAD-JFK (!).
But EWR-SJU needs to get a little better for B6 first. I heard they have pretty good loads but the SJU-EWR doesn't do as well as the EWR-SJU route oddly enough. I think as time goes on they will up the EWR-SJU and when they do that they can go into EWR-BQN later on if they see more demand, like PAX booking it through MCO. But EWR-PSE will never happen on B6 since CO can't do it really. JFK-PSE does well though!
A3B6NY From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 6 posts, RR: 0 Reply 25, posted (7 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 1228 times:
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 445 posts, 
. That said, why is IAD-LAS only on there one way?
From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 31117 posts, 
jetBlueAtJFK 
From Puerto Rico, joined Mar 2004, 125 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
