Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Cuts Fares Up To 66% @ GSO  
User currently offlineEwmahle From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3592 times:

GSO announced today in its Fly From PTI e-mail that US will cut fares to 33 cities up to 66%. It looks like it will only affect the walk up fares not the advanced purchase fares.

Do you think that we could see a drop in the advance fares from other airlines to compete? This also states that GSO is the airline's first non-hub airport to have a wholesale restructuring of fares.

Maybe an attempt to fend off any intrusion by Jet Blue into GSO?

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5008 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3576 times:

Quoting Ewmahle (Thread starter):


This also states that GSO is the airline's first non-hub airport to have a wholesale restructuring of fares.

They need to roll out a systemwide restructring of fares. At the moment they are neither fish nor fowl. Which is it US? Are they really gonna be a low-fare carrier a la HP or or they clinging to the last vestiges of the legacy model?



Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3562 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 1):
They need to roll out a systemwide restructring of fares.

Why? Price what the market will bear.


User currently onlineFlyPIJets From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 871 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3486 times:

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 2):
Why? Price what the market will bear.

That worked so well for US in the past. Besides, how do you know, exactly, what the market will produce if you don't change fare structures from time to time. The market is not static.

Good news for GSO. Also good to see US taking advantage of a market that seems to be able to sustain itself but not appeal to LCC's. Lowering the walk up fare is a really good move. That should act to shore up Greensboro business traffic, which doesn't really want to go to RDU or CLT to fly.

[Edited 2006-02-13 19:37:04]


DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, F28, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, IL-62, L-1011, MD-82/83, YS-11, DHC-8, PA-28-161, ERJ 135/145, E-1
User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3429 times:

Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 1):
They need to roll out a systemwide restructring of fares. At the moment they are neither fish nor fowl. Which is it US? Are they really gonna be a low-fare carrier a la HP or or they clinging to the last vestiges of the legacy model?

What the heck do you think this announcement is about? Contrary to popular belief, setting fares is not a matter of throwing darts at a board, a-la Ryanair.

The airline's revenue/yield management people are working constantly to revamp the old US Airways fare structures, and it's not going to happen overnight. This is about the third or fourth announcement that the New US has put out about its fare restructuring efforts.



USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6712 posts, RR: 32
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3328 times:

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 2):
Why? Price what the market will bear.

Because eventually someone else will decide that the "market" price you're getting looks pretty darned good and that if they enter the market with significantly lower fares, they may just be able to scare up enough traffic to fill the planes profitably. Who used to be the dominant carrier in BWI, PVD, MHT, ISP, ALB, BUF, and ORF? Do you really want AirTran, JetBlue, or Southwest deciding that the market will bear a lower price? At some point, you have to come to accept that the old revenue management playbook doesn't work anymore.

I'm even more shocked to see that US no longer flies any mainline equipment into GSO!


User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3327 times:

I guess my post was vague and therefore misunderstood. What I meant was there's no need to go bargain basement on the fares with something stupid like $49 o/w to Philly or something of the sort... whicih is what I thought the poster I replied to was inferring.

User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 3322 times:

Advance purchase fares ex-GSO also dropped in most cases, although not as dramatically as last-minute fares because, of course, 21-day advance fares are already pretty darn low if you've been paying any attention lately. The gouging was the walkup BloFares to business markets, and that's what HP is focusing on fixing.


USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

Quoting ScottB (Reply 5):
I'm even more shocked to see that US no longer flies any mainline equipment into GSO!

Wow, is this true? If so, thats pathetic. US used to fly a whole bunch of 737s, DC-9s, and F100s into GSO, even as late as a few years ago.


User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6712 posts, RR: 32
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3303 times:

Quoting Tornado82 (Reply 6):
What I meant was there's no need to go bargain basement on the fares with something stupid like $49 o/w to Philly or something of the sort

Agreed. What I see as being problematic is that the walk-up fares have only gone from extortionate to overpriced. US's lowest GSO-PHL walk-up fare is still over twice their RDU-PHL walk-up fare -- obviously because Southwest has limited how much US can expect to charge on the latter route.

Yes, US is making progress in this direction. Unfortunately, I don't think they've gone far enough to blunt the expansion of the real LCC's in their core markets.


User currently offlineFCYTravis From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1191 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3294 times:

Well, "a few years ago" would be pre-9/11. US doesn't *have* DC-9s or F100s anymore, and the 737 fleet has been dramatically shrunk. There just aren't the mainline birds there used to be.

I would not be surprised to see the E190s come into GSO early on.



USAir A321 service now departing for SFO with fuel stops in CAK, COS and RNO. Enjoy your flight.
User currently offlineEjmmsu From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1692 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3284 times:

GSO is down to 72 flights per day after having around 100 a year or so ago. Also, passengers are down about 5% from the year before. The GSO MSA is only about 15% smaller than RDU, yet RDU has 8 times more flights.

Its all about FARES. Peope here in the Piedmont Triad drive to CLT and RDU to get much lower fares.

This is a good move by US.. they will still be able to extract more revenue than RDU or CLT, but get fares low enough where people will actually purchase them.

A month or so ago, GSO representatives flew to PHX to talk to USair managment about the fare problem at GSO. It sounds like their trip wasn't in vein.



"If the facts do not conform to the theory, they will have to be disposed of"
User currently offlineScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6712 posts, RR: 32
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3270 times:

Well, even as recently as the summer of 2004, US was still operating 6 daily mainline departures from GSO. It is a bit ironic that GSO has a US Airways Club but not a single US Airways-operated flight (not to mention the INT reservations center).

User currently offlineGsoflyer From United States of America, joined May 2001, 1093 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3240 times:

US Airways still has mainline flights, I still see 737s here daily out of my office. And I see A319 I think going up to PHL and LGA weekly.

User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 21
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 3219 times:

Quoting Gsoflyer (Reply 13):
US Airways still has mainline flights, I still see 737s here daily out of my office. And I see A319 I think

Really? Are you certain?
Funny, because I can't seem to find them (737, 319) in any schedule source.....



Delete this User
User currently offlineEwmahle From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3126 times:

I have never seen an A319 in GSO, except for an NWA one afternoon. Going to assume it was an equipment change, because I have not seen one since. US used to have two or three 737s daily just in the past few months. I think most of them were just short hops to CLT and there used to be one from PHL.

I think that the lower "walk-up" fares will benefit both US and GSO. I would imagine that the group that traveled to PHX made sure to mention the new Fedex hub, Dell, and all the other potential big business makers that are going to settle down in triad. I think there is a strong business travelers market in GSO and now that the fares are more reasonable we will see them utilizing GSO and not RDU and CLT.


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3110 times:

Only times I've ever seen an A319 was a UA 319 or two heading up to ORD during furniture market...I've never seen a US or NW Airbus here.

As for some non-fare gouging, bring it on...fares everywhere have skyrocketed as of late...it's cheaper for me to fly to LAS/LAX than Boston, which is a pain in the behind (yes, I do have to go out to the West Coast about 3-4x a year, but I also have to go to BOS about 8x a year).

Jeff


User currently offlineFdex727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Quoting Ewmahle (Reply 15):
I have never seen an A319 in GSO, except for an NWA one afternoon. Going to assume it was an equipment change, because I have not seen one since.

At UA, we have run both 319 and 320's to ORD including the TED 320's. In all my time at PTI I've never seen an NW Airbus in scheduled service, I did see one that brought the Minnesota Timberwolves in several years back. Only mainline flight these days are 2 UA to ORD, I believe 3 DL MD-88's and one 737-200 to ATL and AA one MD-80 to DFW. Other than that all GSO receives are RJ's from 35 to 90 seats other than the occasional equipment subs.

Added, US did fly A-321's to CLT two markets ago and DL flew 757's to ATL, maybe three or four markets ago.


UA flew 757's to ORD back in 2002 at market time.

[Edited 2006-02-14 04:18:07]

User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3080 times:

Quoting Fdex727 (Reply 17):
2 UA to ORD, I believe 3 DL MD-88's and one 737-200 to ATL and AA one MD-80 to DFW

Wow, thats sad. 7 mainline flights a day. I remember in the late 90s, sitting at GSO and seeing more than 7 mainline birds at the terminal at one time, much more for an entire day.


User currently offlineFdex727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3080 times:

Quoting Flyf15 (Reply 18):
Wow, thats sad. 7 mainline flights a day. I remember in the late 90s, sitting at GSO and seeing more than 7 mainline birds at the terminal at one time, much more for an entire day.

As young as I am I can still remember Easterns 757's and an occasional L-1011 going to ATL then continuing on to SJU.


User currently offlineEjmmsu From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1692 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

NW was running DC-9's GSO-DTW over the summer and over the hollidays. They are currently in the schedule for this summer, but with NW everything is up in the air right now.

Not only has NW removed mainline from GSO, but DTW went from 4 flights to 3 flights per day. On the bright side, there are now 3 GSO-MEM flights, up from 1 last spring.



"If the facts do not conform to the theory, they will have to be disposed of"
User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 3071 times:

Quoting Fdex727 (Reply 17):
one MD-80 to DFW

Hell that beats Pittsburgh. Prepare for it to become a CRJ-700 soon.


User currently offlineDeltAirlines From United States of America, joined May 1999, 8894 posts, RR: 12
Reply 22, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3019 times:

Quoting Fdex727 (Reply 17):
I believe 3 DL MD-88's and one 737-200 to ATL

Delta does fortunately still have 6 mainliners a day down to ATL, 4x M80 and 2x 737-200.

Still, when I moved down here in Fall 2005, here was the GSO schedule:
UA - 2x 737/2x RJ to ORD, 4x RJ to IAD (in all, one added flight)
NW - 3x D93/1x CRJ to DTW, 1x CRJ to MSP, 2x CRJ to MEM (now 3x CRJ/DTW, 3x CRJ/MEM, 1x CRJ/MSP)
DH - 8x CRJ/IAD (we all know here...)
CO - hasn't changed
AA - 3x ERD to DFW (went to 3x CR7, then 2xERD/1xM80 to DFW, 1x ERD to MIA)
DL - 2x CRJ to DFW (gone), 8x M88/1x 732 to ATL (now 4x M88/2x 732/1x ERJ/1x CRJ), 1x 732/4x CRJ to CVG (now 5x CRJ), 2x CRJ to BOS (same), 2x CRJ to JFK (went to 3x, now gone), 3x RJ to MCO (went to 4, now gone), 1x TPA (gone now), 2x FLL (down to 1x), 3x CRJ to LGA (now 3x CRJ/1x CR7)
US - 4x ERJ to BOS (gone), 7x ERJ to LGA (same), 2x 733/2x 734/multiple Dash 8s/ERJs to CLT, now about 7 CRJ/CR7/CR9, 2x 733/1x 734 to PHL (now 5x ERJ), 4x J41 to BWI (gone), 4x J41 to PIT (gone)

It's been quite a change in the past 18 months for sure...

Jeff


User currently offlineOuboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 4567 posts, RR: 23
Reply 23, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 3000 times:

I really wish people would stop and use their brain for a second.

LCC = Low cost carrier. Where in that do you see the word "fare"?


User currently offlineEjmmsu From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 1692 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 5 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

Unfortuantely, their competition is both Low Cost and Low Fare. Have to keep up with the Jones's.


"If the facts do not conform to the theory, they will have to be disposed of"
25 Fdex727 : When did we lose the MCO flights? I still see three flights a day.[Edited 2006-02-14 05:45:15]
26 DeltAirlines : Oops...my bad (especially since I'm booked on a non-stop GSO-MCO flight in April). GSO-MCO is at 3x daily now (2x ER3/1x CRJ)...must have been puttin
27 ScottB : Actually, not even an LCC so much as an LLCC (Low Labor Cost Carrier). Pretty much everything else is still high-cost, with banked hubs, scads of RJ'
28 Gsoflyer : Maybe I am wrong, but I've flown in and seen 737s from Philly and LGA recently (within the past few weeks). I noticed NW dumped all mainline to GSO, w
29 CentPIT : Well, hopefully they would add PIT back before adding MYR, ROA, and RIC.
30 Tornado82 : Keep dreaming. USAirways pulled down BWI long ago, and MYR? This is USAirways not Hooters Air.
31 CentPIT : I was just trying to say this in a nicer way. Hahaha...your responses are great![Edited 2006-02-15 01:30:08]
32 Ejmmsu : Didn't the elimination of PIT and BWI come about due to the elimination of the Trans-States J41's from the US system?
33 Bond007 : Nope, no US Air ones this month. Also no Airbuses except freight. Actually usually it's cheaper to fly GSO-CLT-XXX rather than CLT-XXX on US, but reg
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New US-Mexico Agreement: Up To Three Airlines! posted Tue Dec 13 2005 04:36:05 by SFOMEX
Lufthansa Wants Wage Cuts Of Up To 40% posted Tue Jun 15 2004 09:40:28 by Singapore_Air
It's Official: US Carriers' Fares Going Up (Again) posted Sat Nov 4 2006 14:01:52 by 777fan
Threat Level Up To Orange US Domestic Flts posted Thu Aug 10 2006 09:59:15 by A340Spotter
Mesaba Unions Team Up To Fight Cuts posted Mon Jun 26 2006 20:50:41 by KarlB737
BAE Turning Toward US--cuts Ties To Eads posted Fri May 26 2006 22:23:23 by BoomBoom
When Will LHR Open Up To DL/NW/US Etc posted Fri May 19 2006 11:17:55 by BHXDTW
Oil Prices Finally Catching Up To Fares? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 07:52:17 by 777fan
UA Boosts Fare Up To US$5.00 posted Wed May 26 2004 19:20:00 by Taca
Qantas Cuts First Class To US posted Thu Jan 9 2003 22:09:00 by MattNZ