Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Finnair Signed For Six More A320s  
User currently offlineHagi From Finland, joined Jun 1999, 176 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 4 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1991 times:

Finnair turned six of its 24 options for the A320 series into firm orders today when it placed an order for two A319s and four A320s, says the Finnair website.

The aircraft are due to be delivered between 2002 and 2003, bringing the total number of the family in Finnair's fleet to 18. That still leaves the company with 18 options. The A320 is used to replace the MD-80 and, later, the DC-9 fleet.

- Hagi, EFHK

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8171 posts, RR: 54
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

They're replacing the MD90s before the DC9s? Anyone know what they're going to do about the long haul fleet? I presum eit'll be the A340 over the A330 since most of their long haul routes are over the pole. 777 would like nice in their livery though.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineHagi From Finland, joined Jun 1999, 176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 4 months 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1912 times:

The MD-80s. Yes. Evidently, they'll get a decent resale price out of those, whereas the niners wouldn't be worth much anymore. The MD-80s are, sadly, to be gone in five years.

I'd love to see the 777 in Finnair's livery too, but a mix of A330s & A340s a la SAS would seem more logical given the company's long & thin routes. Whatever they choose, they should get more planes than they have now! I mean, a long haul fleet of FOUR aircraft? How can you keep up a reasonable level of service to several cities with such few vessels, especially now that one is fitted cattle-only and effectively withdrawn from scheduled service? The answer: you can't.

- Hagi / EFHK


User currently offlineSabol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 4 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1910 times:

Great, I'm looking forward to see them in Finnair's
nice new livery! But why did they repainted an MD82
if it has to be sold out soon ???

regards,
Matej Sabol


User currently offlineKilljoy From Finland, joined Dec 1999, 646 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (14 years 4 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 1905 times:

Since they have to be repainted anyway, they might as well do it in the new colors. They don't spend money on paint for fun, you know  

User currently offlineMd80forum From Finland, joined May 1999, 157 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

My bet: Within five years Finnair's state-owned majority (58 %) will be privatized. A major European airline will acquire a stake, most likely British Airways, and the long-haul network hub will be transferred to Stockholm, mainly serving destinations in Asia.

Jan-Erik Andelin
MD80 International Forum
http://surf.to/md80


User currently offlineSabenapilot From Belgium, joined Feb 2000, 2724 posts, RR: 46
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 1879 times:


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Pekka Lehtinen



User currently offlineHagi From Finland, joined Jun 1999, 176 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1850 times:

An interesting scenario, Md80forum, but based on what?

While privatization is the norm in Europe nowadays, and Finnair might be in an acceptable shape for that, it would hardly be in the state's interests to let go of their stake. Take the present stock price, for instance, and consider how cheap the company would go. The real estate plus the aircraft must be worth a lot more than their current stock value! I would guess that the state will keep at least a 51% majority unless something dramatically affects the airline's stock value. And I can't see anything like that happening in the near future.

And why would long haul operations be moved away from the hub city where the majority of the clientele are? It's not as though steadily-growing air travel encourages that kind of move, all the less when there's virtually no competition to push the weak players out of that specific market sector.

On the other hand, I'm waiting for the day when the other Oneworld members start to make some commitment and take responsibility: right now we only get BA, and while IE, IB, AA and QF appear on codeshared flights to/from HEL, only IB of those has ever really been seen here. I think so far, Oneworld alliance hasn't been much of a benefit for either Finnair or our travelling public, but let's be patient and hope things are still shaping up. At least that's what all the indicators are pointing at.

- Hagi / EFHK


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
More A320s For Mexicana posted Thu Nov 30 2000 01:17:55 by AM
Jazeera Eyes 6 More A320s. posted Tue Nov 7 2006 12:06:08 by Manni
Qatar Airways Opts For 20 More Boeing 777s posted Tue Nov 7 2006 03:32:58 by BoeingBus
Emirates Secures Rights For 10 More 747F's posted Sun Oct 8 2006 16:11:01 by Navion
AirAsia To Take Even More A320s posted Fri Jul 21 2006 07:58:25 by Flying-Tiger
Boeing In Talks For 1000 More 787s posted Tue Jul 18 2006 10:21:37 by FCKC
Air One Signs For Six CRJ900 posted Tue May 16 2006 13:39:02 by Airblue
GoAir Confirm Order For 10 + 10 A320s posted Wed Feb 22 2006 11:07:31 by PanAm_DC10
Finnair Replacement For MD-11 posted Tue Aug 9 2005 17:44:14 by Dogfighter2111
Jet Airways Orders 10 A330 Option For 10 More posted Tue Jun 14 2005 12:10:52 by KL911