BoomBoom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3644 times:
Quoting Lumberton (Reply 1): We can argue all day long whether or not its "gospel", but at least its a data point for future reference.
Yes, the article states:
Quote: Richard Aboulafia of The Teal Group issued his estimates of the average prices paid per aircraft family. Comparing them to those issued in November by Ed Greenslet in his Airline Monitor magazine shows they are fairly close in agreement.
Sabenapilot From Belgium, joined Feb 2000, 2714 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3573 times:
The list prices of those models which have the version specified look pretty accurate and consistent to what I have as information. However, as the difference on the A343 and A346 suggests, it might be worth splitting out the other models too...
Some diversification of the figures for the Airbusses:
Cruiser From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 1000 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 3478 times:
I think that these are the closest numbers that we will ever get...they certainly seem to indicate roughly how much each airline pays. The only one I find a bit high is the 777. Why would it be the highest discounted (% wise) plane when it is selling like hotcakes?
Leahy on Per Seat Costs: "Have you seen the B-2 fly-by at almost US$1bn a copy? It has only 2 seats!"
to all those who said I was full of .... for saying they paid 80 million for a A333 , I apologize profusely! I suspect that since these prices are almost list price, they may include significant spares/training packages.
Trex8 From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 4409 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3402 times:
Quoting EI321 (Reply 8): Thanks for the link Trex8. Any idea how much those options cost?
all I know is whats in the link, if you check previous year reports at their website, you find they paid 60 something million for their 738s and 160 for A343. They seem to like to use the term aggregate price for the contracts which again leads me to think the price quoted in the reports is not just for the plane itself but everything else related to it also. Their history is also to use single banks to finance individual planes so the 80 something million for a A333 may still be the price of the plane itself an maybe even less the engines which for a A333 are probably 10 mil a piece.