Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing Predicts Passenger 747-8 Order This Year  
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8628 times:

Boeing is adamant that this year it will gain the first orders for its 747-8 passenger aircraft but is unwilling to predict whether it will be in the first or second half.

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...ssenger+747-8+order+this+year.html

32 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAtnight From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 606 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8583 times:

I will be watching to see how jumps into this airplane first.... In my opinion, the airline that selects this type will do it in the 4th quarter of the year if the order does come through... I still believe that unless is a carrier who absolutely doesn't want the A380 or Airbus, most carriers will wait until next year to make their decision as to which large aircraft to get, only after SQ's A380s start to show numbers... Time will tell I guess...


B707 B727 B733/5/7/8/9 B742/4 B752/3 B763/4 B772 A310 A318/319/320 A332 A343 MD80 DC9/10 CRJ200 ERJ145 ERJ-170 Be1900 Da
User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 8573 times:

My guess would be an Asian carrier: CX, NH, or JL.

User currently offlineAA1818 From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Feb 2006, 3429 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 8395 times:

I'm guessing CX or NH- JL won't be ordering much for a while. They need to sort out their problems first. I think JL is likely in the future though- perhaps '08 and beyond. BA seems likely as well in that time frame- and to be honest, I don't see BA buying the A380. Qantas could also be a potential especially if they don't order the 773ER. My money's on CX though or a Chinese Airline!

AA1818



“The moment you doubt whether you can fly, you cease for ever to be able to do it.” J.M. Barrie (Peter Pan)
User currently offlineBoeingfan71 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 96 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 8340 times:

i think the first to get it will be definetley JL or BA seeing that they are huge 747 operators already. Cheers, drake f.

User currently offlineKappel From Suriname, joined Jul 2005, 3533 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 8286 times:

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 3):
JL is likely in the future though-

With JL's current problems, NH would be more likely, but they are moving towards smaller aircraft (773). BA won't order anything soon, but they are a possiblilty. CX just made a big order and s did QF. I also doubt it will be an airline who has the a380 on order (personal opinion, while it's still a big gap between the 748 and a388 I think airlines will stick with one VLJ).
Perhaps Asiana? They recently stated they wanted to replace their 744's. Granted, the report said they were condidering the a380, but that seems too big for them.
Another possibility would be CI, together with the replacement for the a343, an order for the 748 (789/78-10 with a 748 order?)
Or even most logical would be GECAS, perhaps ILFC, but seeing the engine choice I'd say GECAS.



L1011,733,734,73G,738,743,744,752,763,772,77W,DC855,DC863,DC930,DC950,MD11,MD88,306,319,320,321,343,346,ARJ85,CR7,E195
User currently offlineCHRISBA777ER From UK - England, joined Mar 2001, 5964 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 8279 times:

Eva Air? Thats not a bad guess i'd say.


What do you mean you dont have any bourbon? Do you know how far it is to Houston? What kind of airline is this???
User currently offlineFlyingHippo From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 680 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 8090 times:

Quoting CHRISBA777ER (Reply 6):
Eva Air? Thats not a bad guess i'd say.

Nope... BR is replacing their 744s with 773ERs. 773ER will be the biggest plane in their fleet in the future.

NH is the same, going with 773ER as their flagship type. I think CX will eventually go with A380 now they have ordered the 773ER, the gap between 773ER and 748I is too small, IMO.

I'd put my bet on BA or CI, with UA being the WILD card.

[Edited 2006-02-24 17:25:19]

User currently offlineFLALEFTY From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 424 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 7920 times:

I'm willing to bet that JL will be offered a package deal of freighters and passenger versions of the 747-8 by Boeing. JL's fleet of 747-200 cargo jets are getting tired and they could use a size and efficiency upgrade over the passenger 747-400s on their Trans Pacific routes.

The deal might include taking JL's older 747-400s in trade for conversion and remarketing as freighters.


User currently offlineFlyingHippo From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 680 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7913 times:

Quoting FLALEFTY (Reply 8):
I'm willing to bet that JL will be offered a package deal of freighters and passenger versions of the 747-8 by Boeing. JL's fleet of 747-200 cargo jets are getting tired and they could use a size and efficiency upgrade over the passenger 747-400s on their Trans Pacific routes.

The deal might include taking JL's older 747-400s in trade for conversion and remarketing as freighters.

That would be the logical move by JL and Boeing, however, given JL's situation, I'm not sure if they'd go for such an investment... But, if JL is able to turn itself around within the next 2-4 years, I do expect JL ordering a few 748s in pax and F versions.


User currently offlineFLALEFTY From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 424 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 7786 times:

Quoting FlyingHippo (Reply 9):
But, if JL is able to turn itself around within the next 2-4 years

JL has always been one of Boeing's glamour customers. To get the PAX version of the 747-8 into service, they may give JL very generous terms - such as back-loaded financing and/or leasing terms.


User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 8162 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 7756 times:

I tend to believe that JL will be one of the first to order. The package deal will be attractive to them, but the delivery schedule will be even more important - the planes will come when JL thinks it will be ready to take them, not this year.

For other carriers I believe that the 748i will be a replacement aircraft and will be ordered as needed. This is a lot different than a new plane, such as the 787 or 380 where there was an initial rush. Boeing will, however, be making the 748i very attractive to the initial buyers so anyone who is currently successful with the 744 can be added to the list of potential buyers.


User currently offlineLeothedog From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6378 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Thread starter):
Boeing is adamant that this year it will gain the first orders for its 747-8 passenger aircraft but is unwilling to predict whether it will be in the first or second half.

Boeing really needs to be careful with the bold predictions.



I've got things to see and people to do.
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6327 times:

Quoting Leothedog (Reply 12):
Boeing really needs to be careful with the bold predictions.

maybe Boeing knows something which we don't. Smile



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineReyes27 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 6311 times:

Quoting Leothedog (Reply 12):
Boeing really needs to be careful with the bold predictions.

hahahaha, can't get much bolder predicting that a plane will be ordered


User currently offlineER757 From Cayman Islands, joined May 2005, 2483 posts, RR: 7
Reply 15, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 6076 times:

Quoting Kappel (Reply 5):
Perhaps Asiana? They recently stated they wanted to replace their 744's. Granted, the report said they were condidering the a380, but that seems too big for them.
Another possibility would be CI,

I'd say one of these two is a very good bet. I'd throw CX in there too.


User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 16, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5948 times:

My money is on either CX or BA ordering the first 747-8I, with LH as a potential customer.

User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12128 posts, RR: 52
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 5831 times:

It very well could be UA and LH ordering first. LH is looking at the B-747-800 and also wants to order additional A-380-800s, or will at least exercise it's 5 options for the Whale-Jet. UA will need to start replacing their older B-747-400s, and I believe all of the B-747-200s are retired now. They need to keep their international routes up, and they will need newer airplanes to do that.

A JL B-747-800I/F deal looks interesting, and it might just happen.

But, I really see QF as one of the launch customers. I laso don't think that NZ is completely out of the VLA business, even though they seem to like the B-777.

BA will begin ordering the B-747-800 in late 2007 or 2008 for 2012 delieveries. That will put their oldest B-747-400s about 22 years old, if not older.

I can also see a big NW order for the B-747-800 in 2008, if they can survive bankruptcy.

Now, here is the surprize of all. If Boeing starts selling substantial numbers of B-747-800I/Fs, I look to see Airbus developing a 425-475 seat version of the Whale-Jet, perhaps calling it the A-380-600 or -700. It will offer more range than the A-380-800/900, but will have a shorter, squarter fuselarge (maybe as much as 30' {9m} shorter, but using the same wing and engines as the -800 does).


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 18, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5581 times:

here is something of interest.......

would love to see QF purchase some 747-8's.....but would REALLY love to see QF purchase some 777's instead (which probably won't happen)

http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=4129

"Turning to the 747-8 launched last fall, Mooney said that at a fuel price of $1.50 a gallon the aircraft would have a $2.1 million a year savings over a 747-400 and savings would jump to $2.8 million if fuel hit $2.00 a gallon.

VP-Marketing Randy Baseler told ATWOnline that Boeing has active campaigns with 20 airlines for the 747-8. While he would not name them, Singapore Airlines and Qantas are believed to be high on the agenda, and sources at Qantas told this website that the carrier is "impressed" with the aircraft. Baseler believes the airframer will land two customers for the 747-8 Intercontinental this year.
by Geoffrey Thomas"



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 957 posts, RR: 51
Reply 19, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5515 times:

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 17):
I look to see Airbus developing a 425-475 seat version of the Whale-Jet, perhaps calling it the A-380-600 or -700

Very, very unlikely.

The A380-800 was built more in terms of Boeing philosophy than typical Airbus cannon. The A388 was "over-engineered" to allow for uncomplicated stretch and MTOW boost down the line.

This is analogus to how Boeing builds a model up from it's introductory variant (772A, 762A) while Boeing shrinks either perform lacklusterly or never leave the drawing board (771, 751, 736). Airbus typically starts at the absolute top, and works their way down. This is why Airbus shrinks typically perform better than Boeing shrinks (A332, A319), but Airbus stretch aircraft struggle (A345, A346).

Back to the A388, the A388 is over 100,000 lbs heavier than the 748I. Removing two 2-meter fuselage barrels probably wouldn't change things much, the 747-8I would slaughter an Airbus shrink. The 748I is already targeting seat/mile cost equal or better than the larger A388. Boeing also has more advanced propulsion at their disposal, so retaining A388 engines for commonality would maintain Boeing's edge.

There's also a matter of resources, and Airbus can't get bogged down in too many projects that promise questionable returns.

Quoting Leothedog (Reply 12):
Boeing really needs to be careful with the bold predictions.

That's hardly a "bold prediction." If Boeing didn't recieve another 747-8 order in 2006 they wouldn't need their prediction going sour to look like fools.


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7403 posts, RR: 51
Reply 20, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5492 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 17):
I can also see a big NW order for the B-747-800 in 2008, if they can survive bankruptcy

I don't really see this happening. Once the 744's are retired, I doubt they'll be repalced with more 747's. The 400's are the end of the line for the 747 at NW.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 57
Reply 21, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 5441 times:

I do think that we will see orders for the pax version of the 748 during 2006 from several major carriers - my guess continues to be CX as the first customer with a Chinese carrier to follow. Its also likely that we will see the 748 in BA and JL colors....I think its more a question of when the order will be placed, not if these airlines will go with the 748. Boeing waited a long time to launch the 747NG, and it only made that decision once it was convinced that the 748 would sell in reasonable numbers - every pax and cargo 747 operator world wide is a potential 748 customer and there is place for an aircraft that is bigger than the 773/A346 yet smaller than the A380......the big question is whether airlines will find it cost effective to fly an aircraft in the 773/A346 class, and the 748, and the A380???? Or, will airlines basically select two out of the three for fleet rationalization purposes....this is the big issue that Boeing has to work on: can Boeing convince SQ that it makes sense to fly the 773/773ER plus the 748 plus the A388, and can Boeing make a case over at LH that the A346 plus 748 plus A388 is the ideal large capacity lineup?

It will be interesting to see if the larger carriers think of the 748 and A380 as competitors or as the winning combination in the high-capacity battle.


User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 9940 posts, RR: 96
Reply 22, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 4925 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 19):
Back to the A388, the A388 is over 100,000 lbs heavier than the 748I. Removing two 2-meter fuselage barrels probably wouldn't change things much, the 747-8I would slaughter an Airbus shrink.

For me, it's becoming increasingly obvious that the next versions of the A380 will not only be much higher MTOW than the 388, but also feature a fair amount of weight reduction via more advanced alloys, and also much improved engines. Airbus needs to make the most of the massive wings potential to get the best performance, and turn the weight from a disadvantage into an advantage.
Airbus have already said they're investigating a 9 750 mile range A380R (8750 Nm with full payload), based on the A388.

With that in mind I don't think an A387 will ever appear.
If the argument supporting an A387 development is that it will be an enhanced, top weight model, capable of flying FULL PAYLOADS from SYD-LHR all year round, this aircraft would never be a competitor to the 747-8 - it would be a completely different class.

(Off topic, for the above reasons, I suspect that, if and when the A389 ever gets launched, it will sport a significant range advantage over the current A388, despite the stretch and 650 pax (8500 - 8750Nm is my guess)).
A


User currently offlineLeothedog From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4898 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 19):
That's hardly a "bold prediction." If Boeing didn't recieve another 747-8 order in 2006 they wouldn't need their prediction going sour to look like fools.

Huh? What does that mean? You obviously didn't turn on your "Sarcastic Meter" to pick up on what I was saying.

Yes. Boeing will recieve at least one order for the 747-8 this year. Who knows when or by who (although there are lots of a-netters who think they know, and that's cool).

My point is to simply state there will be at least one order, sometime during 2006, for the passenger version, and that's about the same thing as to saying that sometime during this year someone will purchase a new Hummer. i.e. It's gunna happen. We just don't know by who or when.



I've got things to see and people to do.
User currently offlineGeorgiabill From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 576 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 4865 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Personaly I think you will see more 748F'S before you will see any 748's passenfer aircraft.

25 MrComet : This is a very good point. I doubt too many carriers that have invested in the A380 will buy the 748. Even though they serve two different market seg
26 Flywithjohn : Be geat if it was one of American Legacy carriers....
27 Kappel : I doubt the a389 will handle anything close to 1000 pax in a real airline config, I'd say max 700, with the exeption of a high density version like E
28 WINGS : I highly doubt it. Northwest would be a prime candidate for the B747-8, that is if they actually had the cash. Regards, Wings
29 BestWestern : I cant see IB going for the 748 - the sole routes needing this capacity are to and from the canaries TFS/TFN ex Madrid. With Madrid now less slot cons
30 Post contains images TinkerBelle : Gee, what a surprise? . Well, they better have an order this year otherwise what was the point of launching the damn thing if nobody orders it in the
31 Jacobin777 : I think Boeing will get a few orders, and I wouldn't be surprised to see if PK orders a few......... while PK are getting some 773's to probably repla
32 AvObserver : BOTH Boeing and Airbus do this. DfwRevolution and Astuteman beat me to the punch in responding to this; they've said it all. Although Airbus has prop
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will LH Order The B-747-800I This Year? posted Tue Sep 5 2006 15:43:13 by KC135TopBoom
Lufthansa Shorthaul-order This Year! posted Mon Mar 20 2006 17:03:53 by Johnny
AC Will Announce 50-jet Order This Year 787/A350 posted Mon Jan 31 2005 01:44:17 by AC7E7
Boeing: U.S. 7E7 Orders "unlikely This Year" posted Wed Jul 21 2004 12:13:14 by PANAM_DC10
TG To Opt For Either A380 Or 747-400 This Year posted Tue Jan 29 2002 17:15:37 by Singapore_Air
Boeing Has First 747-8 Passenger Customer posted Thu Jun 8 2006 22:38:38 by Dhefty
Boeing Ahead 2:1 In Orders This Year posted Sun Apr 9 2006 14:36:40 by NAV20
747-8 Passenger Version Order Very Shortly? posted Wed Mar 29 2006 09:35:05 by UAL777UK
Boeing - 733 Firm Orders So Far This Year posted Thu Nov 17 2005 17:20:00 by NAV20
Boeing Expects No 747-8 Passenger Orders In 2005 posted Tue Nov 15 2005 16:38:27 by BestWestern