IFEMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1559 times:
Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 1): Funny. And now we see the root cause of higher airline fares...bloated software development. They should have gone the Microsoft Excel route and put in a flight simulator.
Speaking as someone with experience in interactive software development (my company is a software house and I'm a senior project manager in Development), this software calls data from a (very) large database, it is likely that this easter egg is simply an embedded test that was programmed during development to verify the procedure call of the 'Continue' button. The fact that they left that procedure in the code isn't anything to do with bloated software development; it's a 'tag' of the development team.
I've worked for three software houses, and leaving an embedded 'tag' in the software somewhere is nothing new and is not 'bloating' software development. In fact, I would go as far as saying that I bet it isn't even an internal Alaska development; they have mostly likely outsourced it.
Abefroman329 From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1550 times:
And why in the world would they have put this in on purpose? Do you really think AS wants passengers clogging up the checkin lines with the Easter Egg process so they can see a picture of the software developers?
Chase From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 1054 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1512 times:
I agree with both sides. I used to work on the website for an airline. Often if we were making a link from page A to page B, but page B hadn't been written yet, we would make the link be to somewhere like www.yahoo.com, and then go change it when page B had been written. Sometimes things like that slip through and get into the "live" website. Of course, sometimes people just do silly stuff, too. Once a developer who shall remain nameless put a picture of his dog on that website, and it stayed for a month. There was no page that included the picture, but if you knew the magic URL you could go to www.(the airline).com/(some directory)/(name of the picture).jpg
Afay1 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1293 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1497 times:
It's not an easter egg, but USairways' kiosks will check you in as someone with a similar name regardless of your credit card scan if you already checked-in online. This has happened to me 3 times so far!
As I stated before, it is put there to test remote procedure calls during the Dev/QA process. The fact that it wasn't removed is no big deal. It happens all the time in many types of software. Heck, I bet there's even easter eggs in the apps that serve this forum.
Quoting Abefroman329 (Reply 3): Do you really think AS wants passengers clogging up the checkin lines with the Easter Egg process so they can see a picture of the software developers?
Do you really think the majority of AS passengers even know about the easter egg or even want to see the easter egg? I find it hard to believe that, of the thousands of AS passengers that fly each day, anything more than a minute fraction of them would even wonder if an easter egg existed in the self check in software, let alone take the time to research, let alone try it out. I fly AS all the time, and frankly, I don't care. Am I going to try it out next time I fly them? No. "Clogging the checkin lines" is an overstatement and AS have bigger things to worry about.
DeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1440 times:
There was sarcasm in my post guys. As someone who works with developers every day I understand the test procedures and leaving in links like that. After writing tons of code I can see where little things like that get left in.
I get a kick out of them personally but code writing has gotten sloppy as of late and that has led to bloated programs that are resource hogs. There is no need for a flight simulator in Excel despite what most folks on A.net would say.
"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."