Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Let's Hear It For The Gear  
User currently offlineSleekjet From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 2046 posts, RR: 22
Posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

You guys are the experts; I'm just an amateur photographer. But I'm completely amazed by landing gear.

Just think. Landing gear are complicated pieces of technology, built to support enormously heavy aircraft under enormously stressful situations.

Engines are sexier, but the gear fascinates me more.

OK, just wanted to plug 'em.


II Cor. 4:17-18
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChiGB1973 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 1616 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2406 times:

whoop whoop

I am a big fan too!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fabian Gysel
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim de Groot - AirTeamImages




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jet City Aviation Photography



M


User currently offlineJamesbuk From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 3968 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2388 times:

I personally think that the wheels are the most important part of an aircraft and also the strongest. I think this because they are locked into the airframe they then get chucked out into an aircraft flying at like 200knots then they have to suddenly accelerate to 140-160 knots then after they've sped up, cope with all the weight of the aircraft. You tell me that aint impressive, LOL

Rgds --James--



You cant have your cake and eat it... What the hells the point in having it then!!!
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2369 times:

Quoting Jamesbuk (Reply 2):
I personally think that the wheels are the most important part of an aircraft and also the strongest.

Yeah, who needs those engines.  Wink

Anyway, the 777 has my favorite gear, especially while on short final, when it looks like a bird of prey coming in for a kill, with those big bogeys.

Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineReidyyz From Kyrgyzstan, joined Sep 2005, 536 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2360 times:

After our A330 endorsement course, our training department arraigned a field trip to the Messier-Dowty plant near YMX. Your first impression on driving in, there are the ingots sitting out in the elements, in a very rough shape of the finished gear strut. Going inside, you get over whelmed at the milling machines. The milling gantry's support 6-8 units each for precise milling at the same time. They get milled into the rough shape of the finished product but with a ruffles chip texture, then the hand sanding and polishing begins. As a side note, and the most fascinating part to me that is, hanging from the rafters are propaganda signs. This being post '95 referendum Quebec, the signs, in french of course "that tool which you are speaking of, has a French name, USE IT!" And others along those lines, but you get the picture. I'm not anti-Francophone, I'm just anti-ignorant.

User currently offlineA319XFW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2355 times:

Quoting Sleekjet (Thread starter):
Just think. Landing gear are complicated pieces of technology, built to support enormously heavy aircraft under enormously stressful situations.

Yes

Quoting Sleekjet (Thread starter):
Engines are sexier, but the gear fascinates me more.

But you won't say that if you have to troubleshoot all the problems they have day in, day out  Smile


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4820 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2305 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Sleekjet (Thread starter):
Engines are sexier, but the gear fascinates me more.

The 757 sports the best package...long legs and big t*ts!

So sexy...  Big grin



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineMatt72033 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1617 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

i find it quite disturbing that you can refer to an aircraft as "sexy"

User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4820 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2262 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I find it more disturbing that you can't take it as a joke.


ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineChiGB1973 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 1616 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2250 times:

Quoting Newark777 (Reply 3):
Anyway, the 777 has my favorite gear, especially while on short final, when it looks like a bird of prey coming in for a kill, with those big bogeys.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Erwin



M


User currently offlineJetstar From United States of America, joined May 2003, 1648 posts, RR: 10
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 2217 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Doing the landing gear retraction check or swinging the gear as it is known was one of my favorite things to do in my corporate maintenance days, both on the Gulfstream’s and JetStar’s. Jacking the airplane up, that was another story, we used manual hydraulic jacks, not air operated and more than once I jacked the airplane up by myself, going from jack to jack

Just watching from close up the sequence of events the landing gear and doors go through to fully retract and extend which involves numerous switches, solenoids and actuators, any of which fails prevents the landing gear from operating properly. I would look for doors that did not close properly or bind up, smoothness of operation and also check the manual emergency gear extension. Often as a training procedure I made each of the other pilots operate the manual gear extension system except discharging the blow down bottles.

On time on the JetStar after completing the landing gear check, I could not raise one of the main wing jacks off of the safety ring because of an internal jack failure. The only way I could get the airplane off of the jacks was to replace the failed jack with the airplane still on the jacks. I borrowed 2 wing jacks from another corporate JetStar flight department on the airport. I placed one of the jacks under the main wing spar using a piece of 4” x 4” wood to prevent the jack from damaging the spar. I then jacked up the wing enough until I was able to remove the failed jack and replace it with the other spare using the jack pad on the jack point. Then I was able to lower the airplane back to the ground

Just another day in the life of a corporate aircraft mechanic.


User currently offlineFlyDeltaJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1886 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 2141 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Matt72033 (Reply 7):
i find it quite disturbing that you can refer to an aircraft as "sexy"

What are you talking about, I saw a sexy plane at work today. A brand new Miami Air Intl 737-800 with winglets. The gear was so clean the cowl and the leading edge of the wings was so shiny and clean, Thats pure sexy to me



The only valid opinions are those based in facts
User currently offlineDLKAPA From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 2138 times:

Quoting Matt72033 (Reply 7):
i find it quite disturbing that you can refer to an aircraft as "sexy"

 checkmark 


User currently offlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4820 posts, RR: 26
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2116 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I don't know why I feel the need to defend my comment, but apparently the commonly sexy female attributes I gave the 757 provide no excuse for making such a "disturbing comment". I must be some aviation wacko that has no life and gets off from looking at airplanes...  Yeah sure

Give me a break guys. Not only was it a response to another comment about engines being sexy, it was a joke! A joke that usually gets a few chuckles among my flying buddies, including my old instructor. Tough crowd around here I guess...



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 29
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 2112 times:

This is the only sexy aircraft I can think of:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © TZ Aviation



Harry



Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineMatt72033 From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 1617 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 1992 times:

Quoting FlyDeltaJets (Reply 11):
What are you talking about, I saw a sexy plane at work today. A brand new Miami Air Intl 737-800 with winglets. The gear was so clean the cowl and the leading edge of the wings was so shiny and clean, Thats pure sexy to me

oh dear! lol

Quoting Newark777 (Reply 14):
This is the only sexy aircraft I can think of:

yeah....that i'll admit is sexy!

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 13):
I don't know why I feel the need to defend my comment, but apparently the commonly sexy female attributes I gave the 757 provide no excuse for making such a "disturbing comment". I must be some aviation wacko that has no life and gets off from looking at airplanes...

your taking my comment too seriosuly!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Let's Hear It For The Vickers Vanguard! posted Thu Mar 6 2003 01:52:03 by GDB
Lets Hear It For The Bristol Britannia! posted Fri Mar 21 2003 20:53:47 by GDB
Lets Hear It For The Aerospatiale Corvette posted Tue Mar 11 2003 22:48:00 by GDB
PTVs In Y: Are They Worth It For The Airlines? posted Thu Dec 7 2006 20:14:50 by MaverickM11
STL -- It's For The Birds posted Wed Nov 9 2005 20:27:37 by Stlgph
Let It Snow For The Northeast! posted Fri Feb 10 2006 16:09:22 by Hiflyer
Where Did It All Go Wrong For The BA/US Alliance? posted Sat Feb 6 2010 05:20:39 by gilesdavies
Ok, So What Is It Really Like To Work For The TSA? posted Sat Nov 14 2009 15:13:09 by KLM672
Is It Not Time For The Media To Report Properly? posted Fri Sep 19 2008 13:08:28 by Cumulus
Is It Wrong For The Star Alliance To Get So Big? posted Tue Oct 30 2007 11:29:25 by B777A340Fan