Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Paris - Lyon TGV 25th Anniversary  
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6456 posts, RR: 34
Posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

On Feb. 27th SNCF kicked off festivities to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the TGV and the first TGV route from Paris to Lyon.

What will not be celebrated is the subsequent death of domestic air service between those two cities. An interesting point is that fuel costs are only about 7% of TGV's total costs and, unlike air carriers, is supplied by nuclear energy. Although air fares have dropped in Europe due to LCCs, in the future, rising oil prices will put airlines at an increasing competitive disadvantage

During the first year of service, the TGV cut train travel time between Paris and Lyon from over 5 hours to just 2 hours, and had only 13 return trips. Today there are currently 48 return trips between Paris and Lyon and the TGV has grown to a network of over 1,500 km and 60 destinations, with trains running up to 320 km/h.

http://www.sncf.fr/actu/actuTgv25ans.htm

http://www.trainweb.org/tgvpages/tgvindex.html


Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
24 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJpj777 From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 75 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3820 times:

Has there been any decrease in air service on any other TGV route like Paris - Brussels?

User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7428 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3805 times:

Quoting Jpj777 (Reply 1):
Has there been any decrease in air service on any other TGV route like Paris - Brussels?

Paris - London.
And most of the French domestic routes where the TGV runs (ride < 3h30)
Like Paris - Bordeaux/Nantes/Marseille/Grenoble/Avignon/Nîmes and soon Paris- Strasbourg.
Some cities like GNB (Grenoble) and FNI (Nîmes) are even not served anymore by AF.

[Edited 2006-03-06 21:26:04]

User currently offlineAJO From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 577 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3801 times:

What would have been the price for a TGV ticket had there not been subsidies in building the railways and funding the SNCF?


bla
User currently offlineMbm3 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 853 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3760 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I love taking the TGV when I am in France. It is much less stressful and often less time consuming than running to the airport and catching a flight (except for maybe Nice). Beyond the sheer coolness of the technology involved to get a train to go that fast, I enjoy relaxing and watching the countryside.

I have to think air travel from Paris to Brussels has been significantly reduced thanks to the Thalys high speed link.



Let Me Tell You, Landing A 772ER Is Harder Than It Looks!
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6456 posts, RR: 34
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3719 times:

Quoting Mbm3 (Reply 4):
I have to think air travel from Paris to Brussels has been significantly reduced thanks to the Thalys high speed link.

Yes, there is no air service now between the two cities apart from the single daily 737 SN flight at 7:30 AM from CDG to BRU.



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13206 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3702 times:

I have taken that TVG route round trip back in 1997. It is amazing to go as fast as 310 Kms/hour and 240 Kms/hour average between those two cities. As one doesn't have to go to/from the airport, airport security, if going from city center to city center, it is a lot quicker than an airline for such distances. You also don't have to be strapped in all the time, you can go to the toilet any time you want, there is more room in the seat areas and you can eat when you want. It's too bad we cannot have such fast services in the Northeast corrodor line (Boston/NYC/Phildelphia/Baltimore/Washington DC) instead of having to use airlines or drive for such short trips .

User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3188 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3701 times:

Quoting Jpj777 (Reply 1):
Has there been any decrease in air service on any other TGV route like Paris - Brussels?

Paris-Brussels by air travel was ceased totally for a few years and now there is one daily SN flight for connections, that's it. Also, BER-HAM air service has been ceased IIRC.

Why whould you fly if the train does it in a little more than one hour?

I wonder what will happen to routes like BCN-MAD, LIN-FCO and AMS-BRU once the high-speed rail-links are ready.

Quoting AJO (Reply 3):
What would have been the price for a TGV ticket had there not been subsidies in building the railways and funding the SNCF?

Would be higher  Wink But also, what would air tickets cost if they would even charge VAT on it? What would all means of transport cost if governmental bodies would be able to monetarize and tax all means of transport to environmental impact, etc. That's hardly impossible. Would you include the chance of a nuclear meltdown in the power use of the TGV? And if yes, how many euros?

I've been reading the analysis of the high-speed railway AMS-BRU. It's very hard to monetarize all kind of impacts.

In the end, it stays a political and thus human decision, emotions included. However, a common shared opinion is that on very dense traffic routes up to 500 km, a hihg-speedtrain is environmentally-socially-economically superior to air travel, for longer distances or less dense traffic routes, an airplane is often they transport mean of choice.


User currently offlineVincewy From Taiwan, joined Oct 2005, 767 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3594 times:

TGV will only get bigger, France has exported this technology overseas, South Korea has it now, soon China. (not sure about AVE in Spain as it's part of EU)

User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11154 posts, RR: 59
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3590 times:

Quoting Planemaker (Reply 5):
Yes, there is no air service now between the two cities apart from the single daily 737 SN flight at 7:30 AM from CDG to BRU.

Indeed. I did a speech about this issue a few months ago.

Quoting Vincewy (Reply 8):
(not sure about AVE in Spain as it's part of EU)

Spain's AVE is getting the German ICE-3M, an improved version of the ICE-3 that Germany's DB uses.

They also use the Spanish Talgo 350 which is also very fast.



"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3519 times:

Quoting BA (Reply 9):
Spain's AVE is getting the German ICE-3M, an improved version of the ICE-3 that Germany's DB uses.

But Spains first high speed railway between Madrid and Sevilla is operated by French-built TGV trains.

By the way the Madrid-Seville example shows that a high speed railway can also be very succesfull to a smaller city in a less dense populated country even when it is to one of the poorer parts of it.
Well doen Spain!


User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6456 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3482 times:

Quoting JoFMO (Reply 10):
But Spains first high speed railway between Madrid and Sevilla is operated by French-built TGV trains.

RENFE is an equal opportunity customer and uses Alsthom, Talgo-Bombardier and Siemens trains on the AVE network. You may not know that RENFE is already doing AVE rail alignment work on the Barcelona to France section.



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineRootsAir From Costa Rica, joined Feb 2005, 4186 posts, RR: 40
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3466 times:

Quoting Jpj777 (Reply 1):
Has there been any decrease in air service on any other TGV route like Paris - Brussels?

Air France has seats reserved on the THALYS, the high speed train between Paris and Brussels for its passengers! I think it on a firs class wagon !



A man without the knowledge of his past history,culture and origins is like a tree without roots
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4696 posts, RR: 42
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 3453 times:

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 2):
Like Paris - Bordeaux/Nantes/Marseille/Grenoble/Avignon/Nîmes and soon Paris- Strasbourg.

Do you know by chance when the line to Strasbourg will be opened?



Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineBuyantUkhaa From Mongolia, joined May 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 3395 times:

Not a high-speed line, but the opening of the direct AMS-EIN link next Monday will kill the KL service on that route. The link was supposed to have opened last December and KL already dropped the route accordingly, not sure if KL kept it open provisionally for the last three months.

I'd be interested to see what influence the Shinkansen had on pax numbers in Japan...



I scratch my head, therefore I am.
User currently offlineFelixZRH From Switzerland, joined May 2005, 226 posts, RR: 16
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3376 times:

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 14):
I'd be interested to see what influence the Shinkansen had on pax numbers in Japan...

There was a thread just one month ago that answers most of your questions:
Impact Of High Speed Rail (by Vincewy Feb 7 2006 in Civil Aviation)


User currently offlineSparkingWave From South Korea, joined Jun 2005, 675 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 3333 times:

The TGV is amazing and deserves every credit for providing an alternative to air travel between Paris and Lyon.

But you've omitted one potential drawback, and that is that rail networks are vulnerable to terrorism, perhaps more so, than travel by air.

In Spain there was a grisly terrorist attack on a train that killed many people. In France there was a scare that the same thing could happen.

Fortunately these attacks are rare so far, but in the future if more people travel by train, it would seem logical to assume that railroads will continue to become tempting targets for terrorists.

If the same security measures go into place to protect passengers in trains as in planes, then any advantage that trains currently have over planes would be removed. Imagine if your luggage had to be screened and X-rayed, if you had to go through background and security checks at all train stations, and the added manpower it would take to inspect all rail lines continuously for bombs...

Fuel for thought,

SparkingWave ~~~



Flights to the moon and all major space stations. At Pan Am, the sky is no longer the limit!
User currently offlineCptGermany From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3271 times:

Quoting Vincewy (Reply 8):
TGV will only get bigger, France has exported this technology overseas, South Korea has it now, soon China.

In fact, China chose the ICE 3 for the high speed rail network. I read that on German news about two months ago or so. I apologize that I can't provide a link.

I think that high speed rail service will never fully replace short-haul air service because not every passenger on short flights such as Lyon to Paris is O&D. Some actually continue their journey on long-haul flights. In this case, short flights such as the ones mentioned in this discussion make very much sense.

A possible exception to the above is maybe the ICE connection from CGN to FRA. The train takes about 50 minutes and actually stops at the airport train station first before it continues to Frankfurt main station. Hence, Lufthansa offers airport like check-in counters at Cologne main train station.

In general, I believe that high speed trains are inferior because of the environmental impact and the investment necessary sometimes to build the tracks. High speed train tracks require sophisticated and expensive techniques for track planning and building. Especially, in mountainous regions many bridges and tunnels are required. This also affects the enviroment because often the natural shape of the scenery has to be changed. Besides, in densely populated areas the trains often come close to towns and urban areas, which in turn requires noise abatement techniques.

All of the above is well reflected by the ICE track between CGN and FRA. Just one km cost millions for that track mainly because it needed to cross the Siebengebirge, a very hilly and mountainous region. Furthermore, due to the noise abatement walls one can see the scenery for only about 50% of the total trip.

Airports are already there and an airplane does not have such drastic impacts on the environment. In "anti-nuclear-energy" Germany the CO2 emissions produced by the airplane cannot be argued against with the argument of the train because the latter's energy is produced with coal in power plants.

Personally, I enjoy the experience to travel in a high speed train. However, I do not see it as a threat to short-haul flights. Rather I see it as an excellent alternative to the car in Germany specifically.


User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7428 posts, RR: 57
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3256 times:

Quoting TriStar500 (Reply 13):
Do you know by chance when the line to Strasbourg will be opened?

The TGV line Paris - Strasbourg will be opened in June 2007. The ride should take just less than 2 hours.


User currently offlineIcarus75 From France, joined Oct 2003, 815 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3225 times:

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 18):
The TGV line Paris - Strasbourg will be opened in June 2007. The ride should take just less than 2 hours.

Wrong!!  Smile The ride will take 2h30!



Flying is amazing!
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7428 posts, RR: 57
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3209 times:

Quoting Icarus75 (Reply 19):
Wrong!! The ride will take 2h30!

http://www.estrepublicain.fr/extra/tgv-est/som.html#2

At the end of the phase 1, the TGV will ride at the highest speed to Baudrecourt, then on the last segment Baudrecourt-Strasboug at a "normal" speed. The whole ride will take 2h19.

Then in the second phase, the new tracks will enable the TGV to go at its full speed to Strasbourg and the ride will take around 2 hours.


User currently offlineBuyantUkhaa From Mongolia, joined May 2004, 2915 posts, RR: 3
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3184 times:

Quoting CptGermany (Reply 17):
I believe that high speed trains are inferior because of the environmental impact

Hmmmmm that is a rather bold statement. The local environmental impact of an electric train is close to zero (in terms of chemical pollution), and a power plant can be treated more efficiently because all pollution is concentrated, so any mitigation effort will be concentrated as well (e.g. soot filters etc.).

Quoting CptGermany (Reply 17):
Besides, in densely populated areas the trains often come close to towns and urban areas, which in turn requires noise abatement techniques.

And planes do not require those? Most planes I know are still noisier at take off than trains.



I scratch my head, therefore I am.
User currently offlineCptGermany From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3136 times:

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 21):
The local environmental impact of annelectric train is close to zero (in terms of chemical pollution)

I agree, that is true. However, the preceding impact including track development and manufacture is substantial environmentally. Sometimes, artificial canyons have to be cut into hills in order to build a railway track. Due to their speed, the trains can go uphill only at certain angles and have a limited turning radius.

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 21):
Andnplanes do not require those? Most planes I know are still noisier atntake off than trains.

I agree, planes are much louder at take-off than trains. Nevertheless, a train usually doesn't take-off right next to house, whereas certain railroad tracks here in Germany are literally built next to houses. Besides, high speed trains can be louder than you think. After all, metal railroad wheels are running on metal rails.

[Edited 2006-03-07 20:30:00]

[Edited 2006-03-07 20:31:11]

User currently offlineLJ From Netherlands, joined Nov 1999, 4478 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3059 times:

Quoting BuyantUkhaa (Reply 14):
Not a high-speed line, but the opening of the direct AMS-EIN link next Monday will kill the KL service on that route

The route was already killed in anticpation (the railway should have opened in December but was delayed) and KLM couldn't wait killing it (they wanted to kill it prebviously). The only reason why the kept it open was a) the Philips Skyteam contract and b) the ability to keep the slots at EIN. As AF has taken over the slots last year the didn't have to fly to EIN (if I'm not mistaken only they already axed EIN as of December 2005)

Quoting Joost (Reply 7):
I wonder what will happen to routes like BCN-MAD, LIN-FCO and AMS-BRU once the high-speed rail-links are ready.

AMS-BRU (and probably DUS-AMS) will be axed but at least reduced. There is a reason KLM is participating in the joint venture which operates the new high speed link. I thus doubt they have any intention to keep the current flights. between AMS and BRU


User currently offlineVincewy From Taiwan, joined Oct 2005, 767 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2939 times:

If Western Europe is well connected with High Speed Rails, buses, and other rails, then Airbus's assertion of need for A380 will prevail. From major hubs like FRA, CDG, and LHR, not all passengers will need another flight(s) to connect other cities, instead, it could be rails and even buses. It's much cheaper to arrange it that way, only those heading to another continent or some further cities in Europe will need to connect to another flight.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Horizon On 25th Anniversary Re-Enacts 1st Flight posted Fri Sep 1 2006 00:19:25 by KarlB737
August 2nd: 25th Anniversary Of Munson Crash posted Mon Aug 2 2004 07:40:01 by Yanksn4
ASA Takes Delivery Of Its 25th Anniversary CRJ 700 posted Thu Jun 17 2004 00:57:32 by N102daman
AA 191 25th Anniversary posted Mon May 24 2004 19:54:11 by Ord
25th Anniversary Of PSA 182 Crash posted Thu Sep 25 2003 12:56:43 by LoneStarMike
ATA 25th Anniversary 757 posted Sat Aug 16 2003 18:20:17 by HlywdCatft
Comair CRJ Dedicated- 25th Anniversary posted Tue Feb 5 2002 04:13:19 by Twa902fly
50th Anniversary Of The Moscow-Paris Route posted Tue Sep 28 2004 01:37:08 by Aeroflot777
NW's 25th Year Service To Europe & Paris Gets A330 posted Wed Mar 31 2004 03:49:32 by Seamefly
DTW Nov 24th / LHR Nov 25th Any A.Netters? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 01:07:25 by SpeedBird203