Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SN RJ85 Mergencylanding In GOT  
User currently offlineCityAirline From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 790 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2844 times:


An SN RJ85 took of from GOT a couple of hours ago when the crew noticed that the nosewheel didn't work properly. So the aircraft made an emergencylanding back at GOT but the wheel couldn't handle it, so it broke. Sparkles appeared and smoke filled the cabin. But the plane made a stop and all 28 pax plus crew made it out safe...

Only in swedish

//Alex  Smile

I don't fly to live, I live to fly...
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSWISSER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2750 times:

What was the reg of the plane?

User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 25347 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2685 times:

Quoting CityAirline (Thread starter):
28 pax

Such a low load  Wow!

When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineBrightCedars From Belgium, joined Nov 2004, 1291 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2538 times:

Should we start again the argument about loads and yields? Maybe they were mostly upfront in that case the flight would more than break even.

Which could be expected on a Friday night back to Brussels. Although some weekend breakers might as well be part of the equation.

I want the European Union flag on airliners.net!
User currently offlineEstablished02 From Belgium, joined Jan 2002, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 2354 times:

Hello BrightCedars,

A load of 28 pax on an 82 seater = 34% load factor, which is obviously rather low.
A 40-50 seater could have carried this kind of load as well, possibly at a lower cost.

Let's hope for SN that these 28 have indeed paid a reasonable fare. My best guess would be that all these 28 pax have paid an average fare of 180-200 EUR for that particular segment => this flight may have generated 5040-5600 EUR total revenue. I'm not familiar with the operating costs of an RJ85, however I would guess that this kind of revenue would not be sufficient to cover the costs of a 1,5 hour flight with an AVRO.

I suppose that the affected flight was SN2274 GOT-BRU 16:55-18:45.
I would think that this is quite a good schedule for a Friday evening and also I would expect that a Friday evening should attract stronger traffic than -let's say- a Monday or Tuesday evening.

I would also expect that the outbound SN2273 BRU-GOT 14:35-1620 in general does not generate too much revenue either...

Hopefully the real revenue picture is more pretty, however I would also have responded like ...

Quoting Gkirk (Reply 2):
Such a low load  Wow!

User currently offlineFrenchPilot From France, joined Aug 2004, 84 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2264 times:

Well, I would really like to know more about this incident, since I was on the Air France flight getting to GOT that night, and we were diverted (Save airport in GOT), since the airport was closed to traffic till 2am. I guess no pics either of the happening? I tried to see the aircraft today when getting back to CDG, but wouldn't see it.

Any news anyone?

Thanks  Smile

"Sur votre gilet vous trouverez un sifflet pour attirer les poissons..."
User currently offlineCityAirline From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 790 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 2069 times:

Quoting Gkirk (Reply 2):
Such a low load

Yes I know, and later I read that the load was actually 22 pax (!!!), and 6 in the crew, now thats even lower...
I was at GOT a couple of weeks ago, and saw the pax from SN2271 (09.30-11.20) coming out from the aircraft after landing from BRU, and there were about 35 or so, I think...

Quoting Established02 (Reply 4):
I suppose that the affected flight was SN2274 GOT-BRU 16:55-18:45.

No, actually the flight was SN2276, 19.30-21.15 (but the flight was delayed by more than an hour for unknown reason.

bye  Smile

I don't fly to live, I live to fly...
User currently offlineSNA350 From Belgium, joined Dec 2005, 129 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (10 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

Quoting CityAirline (Reply 6):
6 in the crew

6 crew???
that seems a lot to me certainly with that load
Last year I flew a SN RJ100 and there were only 4 crew and the airplane was full

Aircraft flown: B733, B734, B736, B737, B738, B744, B752, B763, B772, A319, A320, A321, A343, A346, Do328, CRJ7, E190
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
MyTravel In GOT 2004 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 14:23:31 by CityAirline
Plane To Make Mergency Landing In GOT posted Thu Apr 6 2006 22:17:26 by Flyboy_se
SN To Pioneer In Data Link Taxi Clearance Trials posted Mon Jul 18 2005 23:02:46 by Sabenapilot
SN Offices/GSA In India posted Sat Mar 1 2003 16:08:13 by B747-437B
Tommorow Arrival Of First SN Brussels Airlines In posted Sat Feb 23 2002 22:05:30 by Manni
Cargo Airlines In GOT posted Mon Dec 10 2001 22:54:07 by Funny
SN Brussels A330 Damaged By Loader In Douala posted Wed Nov 8 2006 17:43:39 by Sn26567
Camair: SN Brussels Out, United In posted Wed Oct 18 2006 10:50:00 by Sn26567
KLM Stopover In Bonaire:do We Got Off The A/c? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 09:02:19 by RootsAir
SN Brussels Airlines Revamps In-flight Product posted Sun May 28 2006 21:19:33 by SN-A330