Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Gaping Hole In Star Alliance Network!  
User currently offlinePoh2 From Venezuela, joined Oct 2003, 219 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 10448 times:

Ever since UA pulled out of Caracas years ago, the Star Alliance has a huge hole between the northern countries of South America (Colombia, Venezuela, etc.) and the United States. Currently, the only way to fly to any destination within the US on a Star Alliance carrier is via YYZ on Air Canada or via GRU on Varig, both of which are clearly not viable options.

For CCS, the Star Alliance airlines are: TAP Portugal, Lufthansa, Varig, and Air Canada. The one hole, IMO, is between CCS and the US. I find it hard to believe that United Airlines or US Airways can't open up some flights to CCS. Granted, they were both bankrupt and were trying to reduce costs, but is there any chance that we might see UA in CCS again in the future?

MIA-CCS has intense competition from AA, VH (Aeropostal) and S3 (Santa Barbara). But perhaps a CCS-IAD flight could work? Or maybe a MIA-CCS could work given the huge amount of connecting traffic that the Star Alliance could route via MIA?

I'd greatly appreciate your comments on this...

Thanks!
Patrick


"Life is too short to take everything seriously."
31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBullpitt From Spain, joined Mar 2004, 871 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 10252 times:

I think there are two problems with this route for US airways.

1) With their actual situation and the bad USA-Venezula relations do they want to risk being cought in the middle?

2) Do they have the aircraft availeable and will the route generate income in the short run? They can not afford to pull an aircraft from a profitable route to try and cover a route that wont guarantee them anything.

TMHO.



These are my principles but if you don't like them I have others
User currently offlineKaitak744 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2306 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 10171 times:

Well, this is not the only hole in the network.

Flights with in Africa, India, and China are largely non-existant.


User currently offlineYOWza From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 4845 posts, RR: 15
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 10048 times:

Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 2):
Flights with in Africa, India, and China are largely non-existant.

Indeed this is the bigger and more immediate concern. SA will be on board as of 01/04 and the Alliance is looking for a Chinese partner and the ever lingering rumours of QR would add great capacity into India. QR has a ridiculous number of flights in India ex DOH.

YOWza



12A whenever possible.
User currently offlineTonyBurr From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 1012 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 9738 times:

Another big hole is the huge continent of Australia! You can get there on Star Allliance but you can not get from one end to the other or within the conutry on STAR since ANSET closed down!

User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 9693 times:

If we're talking holes in alliances....let's talk One World and Skyteam. Star Alliance is much, much better covered worldwide than either of those.

User currently offlineLuisde8cd From Pitcairn Islands, joined Aug 2004, 2537 posts, RR: 31
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days ago) and read 9623 times:

Quoting Poh2 (Thread starter):
MIA-CCS has intense competition from AA, VH (Aeropostal) and S3 (Santa Barbara). But perhaps a CCS-IAD flight could work? Or maybe a MIA-CCS could work given the huge amount of connecting traffic that the Star Alliance could route via MIA?

Hola Poh2! I think UA ain't coming back to CCS from MIA. UA's MIA ops have been drastically reduced in favor of Ted flying into FLL. I believe the best way would be for UA to come back with A320 daily service from IAD. IAD can offer good connections to lots of US destinations, just like ATL with DL.

Another remote possibility would be US Airways from FLL. I think they have a focus city in FLL. With a CCS-FLL flight, US could easily fill the plane with O&D and connecting pax.

Saludos desde Caracas,
Luis


User currently offlineBohica From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 2629 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 9232 times:

Due to the heated political situation between the USA and Venezuela, I don't see UA or US going to CCS anytime soon. In fact Venezuela is trying to kick out CO and DL and reduce AA flying for political reasons.

User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26196 posts, RR: 76
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 9011 times:

Quoting Bohica (Reply 7):
In fact Venezuela is trying to kick out CO and DL and reduce AA flying for political reasons.

That could be changed very easily. The reason for this dispute is an ill-founded reduction of Venezuela's status from Cat. 1 to Cat. 2 in order to squeeze the Chavez government.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineAS739X From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 6001 posts, RR: 24
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 8845 times:

Venezuela just booted ALL american carriers out of there. How does the US carriers have any way to fill the hole? FedEx isn't even allowed into Venezuela now.

ASLAX



"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineBHXDTW From Eritrea, joined Feb 2005, 1088 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 7555 times:

Quoting AS739X (Reply 9):
Venezuela just booted ALL american carriers out of there. How does the US carriers have any way to fill the hole? FedEx isn't even allowed into Venezuela now.

whats going on in Venezuala ?!?!

why are they kickin out America ?! Is there any other airlines that fly from CCS to the USA ?


User currently offlinePoh2 From Venezuela, joined Oct 2003, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 7280 times:

Quoting AS739X (Reply 9):
Venezuela just booted ALL american carriers out of there. How does the US carriers have any way to fill the hole? FedEx isn't even allowed into Venezuela now.



Quoting BHXDTW (Reply 10):
whats going on in Venezuala ?!?!

why are they kickin out America ?! Is there any other airlines that fly from CCS to the USA ?

The Venezuelan government is trying to get our FAA rating up to Category 1 from Category 2. To put pressure on the USA, it decided to restrict the number of flights into Venezuela by American carriers. So, if the issue is not resolved by March 30th, Delta and Continental will not be allowed to fly to Venezuela anymore and AA's flights will be reduced (only flights from MIA will be allowed; JFK and SJU will be cancelled).

However, let's pretend for a second that this issue is resolved. Do you think that UA or US may start flights to CCS at some point?



"Life is too short to take everything seriously."
User currently offlineCptGermany From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6880 times:

Quoting BHXDTW (Reply 10):
whats going on in Venezuala ?!?!

why are they kickin out America ?!

As far as I know, Venezuela has a socialist, very far left wing, regime. Therefore, they don't like the US very much. This is the basis for all the dispute that has been going on lately, IMO.

Check out this link for further information:

http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/us-venezuela.htm


User currently offlineTransAmerican From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 31 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6650 times:

Quoting CptGermany (Reply 12):
As far as I know, Venezuela has a socialist, very far left wing, regime. Therefore, they don't like the US very much. This is the basis for all the dispute that has been going on lately, IMO.

That's a very simplistic, and frankly very naive summary of the situation in Venezuela. I don't mean to sound confrontational, nor do I wish to start any arguments, but with the greatest of respect, I'd suggest that you do a bit more homework about the current situation before commenting on something that you clearly don't understand.

Years ago, the US quite justifiably downgraded Venezuela's rating to Cat 2. There were clear and obvious reasons for this, given the crumbling air traffic infrastructure within the country, and it was stated that any possible future restoration of Cat 1 status would be conditional upon Venezuela investing significant amounts of resources and time to make the necessary improvements. Venezuela has since met and exceeded the conditions bestowed upon it by the US, including the introduction of a formalised air traffic administration body, and has subsequently petitioned the US to restore Cat 1 status through open and diplomatic channels. These petitions fell upon deaf ears.

Frustrated that US carriers were continuing to enjoy the freedoms of operations to Venezuela that Venezuelan carriers were denied by the US, and with there being no recognition by the US that they even owed Venezuela an assessment of its status (never mind an automatic reinstatement of Category 1 status), Venezuela took extreme, but not unreasonable, action to force America's hand.

However, this isn't blackmail, it isn't holding a gun to America's head to force them to do something unreasonable. Quite the opposite, it is simply doing the same to America that the US has done to Venezuela. Venezuela has met and exceeded the terms set down by America, and for all intents and purposes is a Cat 1 country, being denied Cat 1 privileges. Therefore, Venezuela has threatened to deny the privileges of operations to its country by US carriers, until US authorities meet their own obligations. If Venezuela has indeed met Category 1 status, then it seems to me that the US would only be withholding the official reinstatement of that status to Venezuela on political grounds, and that certainly seems to be the case so far.

Venezuela has extended its deadline by one month to allow the US to rectify the situation. However, it is rather telling of America's stance in this situation that they have issued no public statements condemning Venezuela's actions as inappropriate or confrontational. Indeed, the US has remained completely tight lipped in public about the situation, and only acknowledged it through diplomatic channels. This suggests to me that US authorities are well aware that they're not exactly in the right over this issue.

It's true that the US and Venezuela do not enjoy the best of friendships, but to reduce this whole situation to, and blaming it all upon, the actions of the latter's government is extremely naive. President Chavez is hardly my favourite person - although I think very little of President Bush as well - but Chavez's actions in this situation cannot be judged as so unreasonable when you make even a token effort to understand the background.



Dream like you'll live forever. Live like you'll die today.
User currently offline777fan From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2481 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6387 times:

Quoting Kaitak744 (Reply 2):
Flights with in Africa, India, and China are largely non-existant.

China?! Are you serious?! It's well served from the US (by SA)">UA) as much as the FAA has permitted. I believe that Air China is also on the list of SA members in waiting. Talk to the CCCP government about opening up to foreign carriers; they ultimately control who's in and who's out.

You'd be hard pressed to find an African carrier in any airline alliance. Many of the most populated countries/cities don't meet FAA standards and host airlines with shady safety and maintenance practices.



DC-8 61/63/71 DC-9-30/50 MD-80/82/83 DC-10-10/30 MD-11 717 721/2 732/3/4/5/G/8/9 741/2/4 752 762/3 777 A306/319/20/33 AT
User currently offlineCkfred From United States of America, joined Apr 2001, 5067 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6286 times:

If you want to talk about holes, how about OneWorld's hole in Canada, ever since AC bought CP.

User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3760 posts, RR: 13
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 6067 times:

Quoting 777fan (Reply 14):
You'd be hard pressed to find an African carrier in any airline alliance.

Isn't SAA in the process of entering Star Alliance?

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
User currently offlineCptGermany From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 86 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 5939 times:

Quoting TransAmerican (Reply 13):
It's true that the US and Venezuela do not enjoy the best of friendships, but to reduce this whole situation to, and blaming it all upon, the actions of the latter's government is extremely naive. President Chavez is hardly my favourite person - although I think very little of President Bush as well - but Chavez's actions in this situation cannot be judged as so unreasonable when you make even a token effort to understand the background.

Obviously, you seem to have a very good knowledge of the current situation between Venezuela and USA. Furthermore, obviously I have a rather superficial impression of what is going on there.

All I know is that Chavez is a socialist and Bush is a conservative republican. I am certain that you agree with me if I state that the relationship between the two is not happy due to their political differences, and subsequently the relations between the two countries suffers. This overall attitude the two countries/governments have towards each other doesn't foster an improvement of the airline connections between Venezuela and the US.

That is basically what I wanted to say in order to attempt to answer BHXDTW's question. It was a "simplistic" answer to a simplistic question. Besides, I did not blame just one side, the Venezuelian government, I merely just mentioned one side.


User currently offlineIL96M From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 137 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 5055 times:

Quoting Poh2 (Thread starter):
the Star Alliance has a huge hole

Well, if you want to talk "Holes", how about the fact that there is exactly ONE flight between NYC (any airport) and LON (any airport), which is UA?

Talk about a gap in the market... any idea when this will improve?


User currently offlineCure From Italy, joined Sep 2005, 227 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4775 times:

Hey guys...I keep reading about USA called America, but Venezuela is part of America too...: very naive observation, but couldn't resist pointing it out.

Regards,

V


User currently offlinePgtravel From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 446 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4714 times:

Quoting Poh2 (Thread starter):
Ever since UA pulled out of Caracas years ago, the Star Alliance has a huge hole between the northern countries of South America (Colombia, Venezuela, etc.) and the United States. Currently, the only way to fly to any destination within the US on a Star Alliance carrier is via YYZ on Air Canada or via GRU on Varig, both of which are clearly not viable options.

Well, with UA's new codeshare with TACA, maybe they'll move in to Star Alliance one day and fill the void to some extent.


User currently offlinePdpsol From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 1088 posts, RR: 6
Reply 21, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 4683 times:

Quoting Cure (Reply 19):
Hey guys...I keep reading about USA called America, but Venezuela is part of America too...: very naive observation, but couldn't resist pointing it out.

For unknown reasons, many individuals in the US and even in western Europe refer to the US as "America", eventhough the term actually refers to the entire western Hemisphere, from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego [North + Central + South America + Caribbean].

So oftentimes, one needs to ask whether one is referring to the entire Hemisphere or only to the US when applying the term, "America".

Getting back to the post, one cannot imagine SA)">UA or US serving the main northern destinations in South America, BOG, CCS, UIO anytime soon.

For obvious reasons, SA)">UA is focused on IAD and ORD services to GRU, GIG and EZE in the southern cone of the continet. Perhaps something may be added from their hubs in LAX, SFO and DEN, although that is unlikely as well.

US only serves destinations in the Caribbean, Central American and Mexico markets. They do not have ANY destinations in South America.

Also, RG, with all its associated problems and soap opera drama, is not the best partner for Star in the region.

There were some rumors AR may at some point over the next five years join Star Alliance, but nothing is currently in the works. AR's primary shareholder, Marsans SA of Spain, is a very small investor in JK [SK owns over 95%], which is a Star member.

JJ, after its fabulous IPO on the NYSE last week, is flush with cash and focused on consolidating its regional and international growth. It is more likely to join oneWorld.

AV has historical ties with DL, SkyTeam.

Following its full privatization, MX has a new owner and will most likely initiate a strategic review of alliance alternatives.

TA is not an alliance member.

CM is a member of the SkyTeam Associate Program. I still have no idea how the terms of this "Associate" membership differ from those of other members; rather bizarre.


User currently offlineMGA From Nicaragua, joined Mar 2005, 726 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4661 times:

TA´s new codeshare agreement with UA is the closest you´ll get as the missing link. Hopefully the codeshare will result eventually in membership into the alliance. Many of us have agreed that TA could fit very well into it.

MGA



Que viva el guaro, el dinero y los aviones!!!
User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5564 posts, RR: 37
Reply 23, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4661 times:

Quoting 777fan (Reply 14):
Talk to the CCCP government

CCCP??? I think this country does not exist anymore since many years. Do you mean Russia?


User currently offlinePoh2 From Venezuela, joined Oct 2003, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 4623 times:

Quoting Pgtravel (Reply 20):
Well, with UA's new codeshare with TACA, maybe they'll move in to Star Alliance one day and fill the void to some extent.

You're right...I forgot about that. TACA could become a valuable addition to the Star Alliance, especially since MX left the alliance last year.



"Life is too short to take everything seriously."
25 TransAmerican : I sense we're going off topic once more, but anyway... Considering the country itself refers to itself as "America", I hardly think it's so ridiculou
26 CPH757 : But you forget that there are 1.3 billion people living there, and they do indeed live other places than Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. Believe me,
27 AussieItaliano : I completely agree. The more accurate term should be the US. The only reason why it ever has been so is because the US was the first territory to reb
28 CHI787ORD : Star isn't that bad in India. SQ and TG cover as much of India as I think is needed. Besides, I do believe AI or 9W is planning on joining Star soon?
29 777fan : Hehe, nope: I meant "Conniving Communist Chinese Protectionists!" (a term introduced to me by my cousin who claims its en vogue in his office). See b
30 Kaitak744 : Well, doesn't BMI have Gatswick-Newwark service?
31 LTU932 : I believe they don't even operated out of LGW. BD's main bases are MAN and LHR and obviously, due to the uncompetitive and IMO senseless Bermuda II t
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air One In Star Alliance? posted Wed Aug 30 2006 00:57:26 by Timetable
Turkish In Star Alliance posted Thu Aug 10 2006 18:17:32 by Qazar
UA 747 In Star Alliance Livery....When? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 11:16:15 by UAL777UK
Swiss Still Not In Star Alliance Timetable posted Fri Mar 24 2006 18:44:10 by Mozart
US Airways' Days In Star Alliance Numbered? posted Fri Mar 17 2006 01:07:38 by Gilesdavies
USAir In Star Alliance After Merger HP/US posted Wed Feb 1 2006 02:29:42 by HAVIK747
US Airways/America West's Future In Star Alliance? posted Fri Nov 18 2005 06:45:18 by B777A340Fan
Question: Who Would Replace RG In Star Alliance? posted Tue Nov 1 2005 17:22:10 by Flyingbabydoc
Air Canada Jazz CRJ In Star Alliance Livery posted Tue Sep 6 2005 12:33:35 by Cruiser
LOT 767-300ER In Star Alliance C/S posted Thu Jun 23 2005 02:55:38 by BlueSky1976