Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Southwest Capacity Controls For Rapid Rewards  
User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 3613 times:

I read recently that WN would be introducing capacity controls on its frequent flyer program in exchange for expanding the earnings window.

I have tried to book some Rapid Rewards tickets online and have had a hard time finding available flights -- a much harder time than I have had on AA or other airlines.

Has anyone else had this experience? I'm interested to see how this is playing out among loyal WN customers.


"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTOLtommy From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 3301 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 3599 times:

Rapid rewards have a 2 year window now,from what I've heard. Your problem could come from where you are trying to go and when. Florida over a holiday, its a problem. But since you don't say, one can't make an accurate observation. AA may have more seats in the market. Are you getting standard award availability on AA? Hard to tell based on what you've told us so far, unless you were just looking to complain. Hard to get used to since WN used to be so easy to use.

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 3590 times:

Believe me, I'm not complaining -- yet. I have always flown both AA and WN, depending on price and destination. I am loyal to AA, but I am absolutely not a WN-basher (as you can see from my signature, I despise those people).

However, I have been trying to book Rapid Rewards tickets more than two months out for routes such as DAL-ELP, DAL-MAF, DAL-SAT, etc., and have had no luck. I understand that getting to Vegas or Florida might be a bit difficult, but I wouldn't expect it to be very tough to get to El Paso or Midland.

I admit that I am disappointed in WN on this issue. I have long defended the airline against the outrageous allegations against it on this board, and will continue to do so. However, one of the key aspects that kept me flying WN was the simplicity of its frequent flyer program. If I ultimately find that this program is no better than a legacy carrier, I will likely exercise my consumer choice and fly with AA exclusively.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3806 posts, RR: 29
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 3441 times:

Quoting Ssides (Reply 2):
If I ultimately find that this program is no better than a legacy carrier, I will likely exercise my consumer choice and fly with AA exclusively.

With utmost respect, if the only reason you choose AA over WN is what you can get for nothing, I seriously doubt that WN will rue the loss of your business.

On the other hand, now that Rapid Rewards can no longer rightly claim to be "an award program you can actually use" (at least in the same generous sense as before, when the only restrictions for booking free tickets were a handful of blackout dates and the flight not being sold out) it will be interesting to see how difficult it becomes to book RR award seats.

[Edited 2006-03-30 02:00:03]

User currently offlineSsides From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 4059 posts, RR: 21
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 3351 times:

Quoting Tango-Bravo (Reply 3):
With utmost respect, if the only reason you choose AA over WN is what you can get for nothing, I seriously doubt that WN will rue the loss of your business.

I don't expect them to at all. But frequent-flyer benefits are not the only reason I choose AA. More destinations (including international), first-class options, and more comfort on board all fit into the equation.

At the same time, however, there should be little doubt of the fact that frequent flyer programs play a large role in winning the business of the frequent business traveler. Why else would UA and other airlines "match" a flyer's elite-status benefits?

I used to be able to fly WN for 4-6 round-trips and get a free flight (depending on bonus credits available through the web site and SWABIZ). The trade-off, of course, was that I couldn't use those free flights to go to Hawaii, London, Sydney, or wherever, and earned no upgrades or any other type of perk.

Now, I can fly WN on 8 roundtrips and get what appears to be a difficult-to-use reward ticket to maybe Vegas, Florida, or California. Or, I can take about 10 round-trips on AA, plus throw in some credit card miles, and get to the Caribbean.

I'll admit, I know little about WN's internal business workings, so they may have rationally discovered that they were losing too much money on reward tickets. That is absolutely fine with me -- I want them to remain profitable. If it becomes quite difficult to book reward tickets, however, I will gladly take my business elsewhere. I don't expect WN to care, however, unless many other business travelers do the same.



"Lose" is not spelled with two o's!!!!
User currently offlineSupa7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3299 times:

This is a case where the legacies were right and WN was wrong... all along. And in the end they admitted it. Next question?

User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 37
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3242 times:

Quoting Ssides (Reply 4):

I'll admit, I know little about WN's internal business workings, so they may have rationally discovered that they were losing too much money on reward tickets. That is absolutely fine with me -- I want them to remain profitable. If it becomes quite difficult to book reward tickets, however, I will gladly take my business elsewhere. I don't expect WN to care, however, unless many other business travelers do the same.

Increasing the window would naturally increase the number of people who could take advantage of the program, which would increase the costs. The question is whether they changed the program to to make people who didn't fly frequently happy, or to compensate for a planned reduction in seat availabilty.

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
This is a case where the legacies were right and WN was wrong... all along. And in the end they admitted it. Next question?

As a *frequent* flyer program Rapid Rewards made plenty of sense as it was, because it rewarded *frequent* flyers as opposed to anyone who travels enough over an extended period of time.



ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineHoosierCFI From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 96 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 3219 times:

I just booked two tickets from BWI - SEA leaving the week of the 4th of July, returning the following weekend. Availability was a little spotty, but we were able to work it out. I too though, was a bit surprised with how little availability there was, especially considering that the July schedule was only recently opened up.

Good luck to anyone trying to get the Hawaii awards. It will be like trying to get concert tickets (Wait until WN releases their schedule, and book immediately).


User currently offlineN200WN From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 784 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 3148 times:

Quoting Tango-Bravo (Reply 3):
I seriously doubt that WN will rue the loss of your business.

Southwest would rue the loss of any Customer. You may have already done this, but you should write a letter to Customer Relations and let them know how you feel. There's nothing better for a company than feedback from the Customer.


User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5694 posts, RR: 52
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 3114 times:

Quoting N200WN (Reply 8):
outhwest would rue the loss of any Customer. You may have already done this, but you should write a letter to Customer Relations and let them know how you feel. There's nothing better for a company than feedback from the Customer.

Agreed, SWA released something awhile back showing a data of how the loss of ONE customer does to SWA and how it affects then monetarily. It was a very good detail and explained why every SINGLE customer is important to Southwest Airlines and how a customer can make the difference between profitablity or not.

Quoting Supa7E7 (Reply 5):
This is a case where the legacies were right and WN was wrong... all along. And in the end they admitted it. Next question?

Ya, are you INSANE?

This worked for 35 years, or whenever they started rapid reward which was close to the date they started. SWA changed this policy because the CUSTOMERS wanted a longer time to get the award ticket, however it had to come with a setback, there would be restricted seats. So now, SWA listened to the customers and changed it now customers are getting a first hand experience of it. If they don't like it, they will complain to SWA and if SWA deems it ok to change it again or back to what it was, then they will. There's the difference, SWA listens.

Alex

[Edited 2006-03-30 06:32:52]


Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Capacity Controls For 1st Class Mileage Tickets? posted Fri Nov 21 2003 18:27:03 by Ssides
Southwest Rapid Rewards Letter? posted Wed Jun 26 2002 00:09:19 by Mirrodie
New Southwest Paint Scheme? posted Mon Nov 20 2006 18:37:19 by Ericsan777
New Delta Scheme: Habitat For Humanity posted Fri Nov 10 2006 03:22:59 by BigPhilNYC
LAS Is The New Southwest Airlines Crew Base posted Fri Nov 3 2006 04:14:15 by Mjlhou
New International Air Policy For Canada posted Wed Oct 25 2006 23:13:22 by DYK
New York's Concorde Searching For A New Home posted Mon Oct 2 2006 04:05:07 by FlyingTexan
Southwest Load Request For Tomorrow posted Fri Aug 25 2006 21:40:22 by Iowaman
Any New UA European Destinations For IAD? posted Thu Aug 24 2006 22:26:56 by Eastern023
AA's New Website Soliciting Support For China posted Tue Aug 22 2006 05:20:28 by 102IAHexpress