Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada Flight 621 1970  
User currently offlineBa777-236 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 673 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 7599 times:

Last year there was an article in a Toronto newspaper about the crash of Air Canada flight 621 on July 5, 1970 at YYZ. The flight crashed after premature spoiler deployment on approach to the airport. The article stated that there was a book to be publised about the accident.

Does anyone know if this book has been published or have any information on it. There is a old thread (Air Canada Flight 621: 34 Years Later) here on Airliners.net about the crash that is very informative and detailed. It even has eyewitness accounts from people who witnessed the accident that day.


I like British Airways! I'm not sure why, but I do! ;-)
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDc863 From Denmark, joined Jun 1999, 1558 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 7507 times:

Should be an interesting book when it come out. The pre-mature landing tore off one engine, then during the go around phase, two explosions from one of the DC-8-63's wing tanks ripped the right wing off. Routing was Montreal-Toronto-LAX.

User currently offlineJetCaptain From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 236 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 7445 times:

The Toronto Star has an archive page on their website that you can use to look at old papers (all the way back to 1894). If you seach for "Flight 621" you'll find over 75 pages covering this accident. It costs a few bucks, but it's worth checking out.

http://thestar.pagesofthepast.ca/

[Edited 2006-03-30 08:16:09]

User currently offlineBOAC707 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 278 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 7283 times:

I knew the co-pilot of this flight while growing up in Montreal. Sad mistake by him cost so much. The place of the crash is currently being turned in to a new housing subdivision.

It was this construction that brought the flight details back into the news, as crews starting unearthing all kinds of stuff from the accident.



smokey classics to the end of time
User currently offlineSwissy From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 1734 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 7239 times:

[quote=BOAC707,reply=3]I knew the co-pilot of this flight while growing up in Montreal. Sad mistake by him cost so much. The place of the crash is currently being turned in to a new housing subdivision.

It was this construction that brought the flight details back into the news, as crews starting unearthing all kinds of stuff from the accident.

Yes you are right, I have vistied the site and there is still (was) a lot left and
not just aircraft parts....... Never understood why they did not clean it up better.............


User currently offlineBOAC707 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2003, 278 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 7071 times:

The CTSB said that it was cleaned up to the best level technology of the day allowed. no one really seemed concerned about the bone fragments found on site....

I guess if all the relatives had closure so there was no need to go further...



smokey classics to the end of time
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8093 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 7047 times:

The CVR of this accident is probably the most horrific I've come across. The shock and remorse in the co-pilot's words is palpable even on the page. Things get worse and worse, first there's the impact with the runway, then it transpires that number 4 is gone. They ask to come back on the same runway (32) but ominously, the controller tells them the runway is closed - it's covered in debris. It's not stated, but the debris belonged to their aircraft. Then it's number 4 and number 3 that have been lost ("The whole thing is jammed"), followed by "[crackling sound] What was that? What happened there, Peter?" Then things completely unravel: "[loud sound of explosion] Pete sorry." And still the CVR keeps recording after that.


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineSPIR From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 8 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 6876 times:

You can go to the Toronto Star, "Pages of the Past" to see lots of INFO about FLIGHT 621 and you can go here: http://homepage.mac.com/friendsofflight621/Menu2.html as well.

Big version: Width: 500 Height: 370 File size: 66kb
Air Canada DC-8-63 (CF-TIW) nose piece found at crash site 34 years later! Given to the S/O's son July 8, 2004 by Friends of Flight 621.



Clean up 621!
User currently offlineDc863 From Denmark, joined Jun 1999, 1558 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 6800 times:

I'm shocked that developers would build houses over hallowed ground.

User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8093 posts, RR: 54
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 6708 times:

Quoting Dc863 (Reply 8):
I'm shocked that developers would build houses over hallowed ground.

Oh for god's sake. You're seriously saying anywhere where a human has died is "hallowed"?! And by "hallowed", you mean, land that is thereafter not allowed to be built on? Can I walk on it? Look at it?

Hallowed my arse. Build on it, go nuts. Why the hell not? Are we doomed to live in a museum of the past because over-coddled twits can't get their head around the fact that death is part of life?



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineBoeingguy1 From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6689 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 9):
Oh for god's sake. You're seriously saying anywhere where a human has died is "hallowed"?! And by "hallowed", you mean, land that is thereafter not allowed to be built on? Can I walk on it? Look at it?

Hallowed my arse. Build on it, go nuts. Why the hell not? Are we doomed to live in a museum of the past because over-coddled twits can't get their head around the fact that death is part of life?

While you could have put it a bit nicer, I agree with you... its Canadian Govt's fault for not sending in some type of clean up operation... why werent the bodies recovered in the first place?



Gatwick South! Id rather crash in Brighton!
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 6681 times:

There was a book published in the mid-1970s (after the THY DC-10 crash near Paris) called "Destination Disaster" as its main title. In the course of backgrounding the events leading up to the DC-10 accident, they went back into Douglas history and found issues with both the DC-6 and DC-8, the latter of which involved the design of the spoiler handle. IIRC from the book, its design was such that it was very easy to deploy the spoilers when one only meant to arm them (for automatic deployment once the aircraft was on the ground), and the Air Canada flight was not the only accident.

The book is long out-of-print, but I'm sure you could probably find one on eBay.com or bookfinders.com if you were interested..

http://cgi.ebay.com/DESTINATION-DISA...sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

[Edited 2006-04-02 21:07:16]

User currently offlineBA747YYZ From Canada, joined Mar 2006, 377 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 6592 times:

My father was a police officer in Peel at the time, and said that they had lobsters being shipped on the flight, and hot summer, smelt terrible. I think he might find that book interesting, but i also believe it was on the same runway as the Air France crash, which i saw from the 401, bad runway.

User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 6587 times:

http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19700705-0&lang=en

This is always a great place to start with any questions you have about aircraft incidents and accidents. We all wish it didn't have to exist, but knowledge is power, and learning from past mistakes is, in my humble opinion, the most dignified way to honor those who have given their lives.



Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlineTribird1011 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 208 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 6496 times:

Quoting BA747YYZ (Reply 12):
but i also believe it was on the same runway as the Air France crash, which i saw from the 401, bad runway.

No. It had it's hard touchdown (early spoiler deployment) on runway 33 (now 33R), where I believe engine #4 separated from the a/c (the FOD that closed the runway) They were circling for 24L (now 24R) when it exploded.

Air France ran off the new 24L which was built only a few years ago (around 2000 or so)


User currently offlineSwissy From Switzerland, joined Jan 2005, 1734 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 14 hours ago) and read 6383 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 9):
Hallowed my arse. Build on it, go nuts. Why the hell not? Are we doomed to live in a museum of the past because over-coddled twits can't get their head around the fact that death is part of life?

I guess we can expect some respect here.........

The problem I have is the on going "mess" with finding all these body parts (bones) and yes this is a place were unfortunately over 100 people vanished and it is a big deal for some people.

Cheers,


User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 12 hours ago) and read 6335 times:

My dad worked in MX for AC at the time, knew Pete Hamilton pretty well,
so the accident was pretty personal for him.

That said, clean up the place as well as is _practical_ , declare it greenfield,
and redevelop. If you think about it, there are lots and lots of places where
bodies are parked underneath existing real estate. After all, billions of people
have been on this planet for a long, long time.

If you declare every accident site (aircraft, train, ship, car) a reserved 'special' location, pretty soon you're going to run out of turf.

Apologies if that seems cold, but we only have so much usable land. I figure,
actually, by the time I have to go, that either we'll be buried vertically to save space, or the law will say up the chimney. But that's probably another idea for another discussion group.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8093 posts, RR: 54
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 20 hours ago) and read 6223 times:

Quoting Boeingguy1 (Reply 10):
While you could have put it a bit nicer, I agree with you...

True. I'm trying to give up smoking and it's turning me into a complete arsehole.

Quoting Connies4ever (Reply 16):
If you think about it, there are lots and lots of places where bodies are parked underneath existing real estate. After all, billions of people have been on this planet for a long, long time.

Grumpy or not, I stand by what I said. I would be horrified if just cos I die in a certain spot, it means that place can never be used again by the living. It's an absurd proposition actually. Like I said. Go nuts, build stuff.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4930 posts, RR: 43
Reply 18, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 6185 times:

Oddly enough, it is not all that uncommon to not completely clean up a crash site. When the cause is immediately apparent, as was the case here, there is no need to recover all the wreckage.

You only need to completely recover the wreckage if the cause is not apparent, and a complete investigation is in order, SR111 and TW800 for example.

It is much like the mid air collision of the TW L1049 and UA DC-7 to the east of the Grand Canyon in 1956. It was very quickly obvious what the cause was, so no need to do total wreckage recovery. There are only certain times of the year that that particular wreckage site is accessible, but having been there, I can tell you .... everything is still pretty well there!!!

Also, with regard to the AC DC-8-63 in 1970, a lot of the wreckage and remains ended up very deep in the soil. A product of both the soft soil (it was farmland) and the airspeed at impact. It seems, that over the years with frost heaving, it has only been in the last decade or so that these things started to appear. I walked through there a few years ago, and found an Air Canada "California Galaxy" First Class candy dish!



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Canada Flight 621: 34 Years Later posted Wed Jul 7 2004 20:37:50 by Canadi>nBoy
Air Canada Flight 621 Crash (1970) posted Mon Oct 22 2001 23:41:02 by Johnnie
Questions About Air Canada Flight Passes posted Sat Sep 30 2006 20:24:09 by Amritpal
6 Year Old Kicked Off Air Canada Flight posted Wed Sep 6 2006 14:24:58 by AIRCANL1011
British Police Interrupt Air Canada Flight posted Tue Jun 6 2006 00:53:53 by CO737800
Air Canada Flight 51 YYZ-DEL posted Thu Aug 12 2004 05:38:58 by Sunnyb
Air Canada Flight Check: A345 Please! posted Tue Jul 20 2004 20:01:16 by Caymanair
Recent Air CAnada Flight In J Class posted Sat Mar 27 2004 17:00:05 by Yegbey01
Air Canada Flight 33 YVR HNL On April 24th 2003. posted Thu Apr 24 2003 02:00:48 by QB737
Air Canada Flight In Ath? posted Sun Sep 1 2002 21:26:00 by Lewis