Dougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (9 years 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2429 times:
It is reported today by Flight International that Boeing is instituting a 'smart' parts tracking system with RF identification labels to be attached to aircraft parts on the 787, the better to trace them. A worthy effort and I applaud them. They are also working on a passive tracking system with Fedex on one of their DC10 freighters.
However. I suggested that such technologies were cheap and readily available back in 1996 when I published a law review article entitled Flying Underground:The Trade in Bootleg Aircraft Parts in the Journal of Air Law and Commerce at Southern Methodist University.
I opined at the time that if the UPS man who brings a package of sneakers to my door had the man-portable technology to scan and track my package from the point of origination to the point of departure, there was no principled reason why we should not be doing the same thing with traceable and life limited aircraft parts, in view of the risks involved from counterfeit and bogus parts.
The technology has only gotten better and cheaper in the intervening years. If we're able to track a 69 cent can of wax beans from the cannery through the distributor and supermarket to the point of sale. it's high time someone did something like Boeing, only cheaper and faster.
N328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6538 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2388 times:
Just as an FYI, but this is not a Boeing-only system. This is one of the areas that Boeing and Airbus partnered up. They also share the same B2B network for parts. Outside of the scope of this, they teamed up on safety standards.
When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
BoeingBus From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1597 posts, RR: 17
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2378 times:
Quoting Gr8Circle (Reply 1): is it possible for unscrupolous individuals (or campanies) to tamper with the RF chip so that the 'tracing' is no longer possible?
You can just peel the rf tag off the part, its like a sticker. But why would anyone want to do that??? This is more for inventory control and traking and nothing to really do with safety. You would still need to following the FAA guidelines and processes when it comes to maintenance.
This just makes like easier for Boeing and suppliers... and customers for an automated inventory control.
Agreed. They've spent alot of time working on standards. As promising as RFID is for retail and consumer goods, coding & tracking of spares is a completely different animal.
Just think what a nightmare it would be if there were 150 different companies in the industry all applying their own proprietary RFID coding system.
Kangar From Ireland, joined Feb 2000, 395 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2292 times:
Even though it's not 100% tamper proof, and what system is?.......it's a big step forward in improving traceability and accountability. Well done to all involved I say. RFID is going to be everywhere soon.