Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
? For You Jetblue Rampers  
User currently offlineRampRat74 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1528 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2149 times:

I just worked flight 166 PDX-JFK. The aircraft number was 598. This aircraft had some weird connectors in the ceiling in the aft pit. It had seven connectors total. It also had three raised sections the length of the floor. The only thing I could think of is. It was for a extra fuel tank. I have never seen this in any of the A320's I worked.

Thanks

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26414 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2149 times:

Quoting RampRat74 (Thread starter):
This aircraft had some weird connectors in the ceiling in the aft pit. It had seven connectors total. It also had three raised sections the length of the floor. The only thing I could think of is. It was for a extra fuel tank.

Your observation is spot on. B6 had Airbus install the ACT on their A320s as a way of extending their range. The problem was, the ACT added so much extra weight that it burned off as much fuel as it added, meaning no increase in range and higher fuel costs. They have been removed and Airbus compensated jetBlue.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineRamprat74 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1528 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2022 times:

Thanks for the reply. I guess the three extra beams on the floor were for reinforcement. You cut the cargo area in half with a tank that size.

User currently offlineRDUDDJI From Lesotho, joined Jun 2004, 1465 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1846 times:

Quoting N1120A (Reply 1):

Your observation is spot on. B6 had Airbus install the ACT on their A320s as a way of extending their range. The problem was, the ACT added so much extra weight that it burned off as much fuel as it added, meaning no increase in range and higher fuel costs. They have been removed and Airbus compensated jetBlue.

ACT= additional center tank? I have never heard of this in the A32x family...was this a prototype thing? How many aircraft was it tested on?



Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26414 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 1838 times:

Quoting RDUDDJI (Reply 3):
ACT= additional center tank? I have never heard of this in the A32x family...was this a prototype thing? How many aircraft was it tested on?

Auxilary Center Tank I believe. It is not a new thing at all. It was actually designed for the A321-200 and has had success there. B6 were the first ones to try it on the A320-200 and it failed

Quoting Ramprat74 (Reply 2):
Thanks for the reply. I guess the three extra beams on the floor were for reinforcement. You cut the cargo area in half with a tank that size.

It is also one of the likely major reasons that they have range issues at times. There is still weight added from the provisioning for those tanks



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
For You Delta Fellas.. (SNA-ATL-HSV) posted Thu May 25 2006 18:46:18 by MrMcCoy
New December 1985 OAG- Will Look Things Up For You posted Fri May 19 2006 23:28:24 by Eastern1985
For You United Buffs - LAX To SLC posted Sat Apr 8 2006 19:08:16 by MrMcCoy
I Found 2 More Videos For You. posted Sat Jan 28 2006 19:23:24 by Beertrucker
Canadian NW Employees, Question For You..... posted Thu Nov 24 2005 04:34:31 by Wobbles
Final Curtain Call For Original Yx Rampers... posted Mon Jul 4 2005 05:32:49 by SkyexRamper
SRQ Has Big Pax Increases For May, JetBlue Notices posted Thu Jun 23 2005 19:22:37 by Oceanic
Tough GA Question For You A-nutters. posted Wed Feb 9 2005 21:41:50 by Pilottj
Mike Boyd On Why Wharton Is Probably Not For You! posted Mon Jan 31 2005 17:16:24 by SHUPirate1
X-mas For You: See This Pic! posted Thu Dec 23 2004 21:40:23 by Macc