BoomBoom From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 13509 times:
Quote: Just in time for summer, LoveMySeat.com has unveiled a suite of comprehensive Airline Seat Comfort Guides™. Free Airline Seat Comfort Scores™ are available for over 40,000 airplane seat locations on Boeing, Airbus and other Airplanes. Coverage includes over 80 airlines... www.LoveMySeat.com.
AlexPorter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 13215 times:
Hmm, seat guru says my seat on my DL red-eye reclines, while this site says it doesn't. I'm in 24D on the MD-88, an exit row seat, with another exit row behind me. Seat guru claims 24E doesn't recline, but 24D has full recline, while this new site claims that neither of them recline. Who's right? Does it have anything to do with the MD-88 interior refurbishments?
Werdywerd From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 687 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 13187 times:
"Beta Release: At-A-Glance Airline Seating Maps & Reviews for 100 Major Airlines for most Airline Flights on over 300 airplanes on carriers such as Southwest Airlines, American Airlines, United Airlines, Delta & U.S. Airways."
It's a Beta release guys which means that they know there are still errors contained on their site and are not done building it up yet. Give it some time
MrMcCoy From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 377 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 13042 times:
Quoting BoomBoom (Reply 11): Maybe it would have been better to wait until it was further along in development before putting it out there.
Nothing worse than creating a BAD first impression.
True, but anything's possible - PRweb does not do much more than check the articles for quality (in terms of grammar and article content) before posting. One of the smartest ways to illuminate a growing competitor these days is posting a press release pointing to an unfinished site. I've seen it before, albeit not often.
(realistically, however, you are probably right)
It only takes five years to go from rumor to standard operating procedure.
GCDEG From Greece, joined Jan 2006, 352 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 13019 times:
Might be BETA but there's still some pretty funny stuff on it. Has anyone got a picture of Gulf Air's new Boeing A340-300? You might catch it in Gulf Air's popular destinations of Burbank to Denver? Or has anyone seen Songs Boeing 747-400 at all?
Btriple7 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 1239 posts, RR: 8
Reply 15, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 12839 times:
Quoting MrMcCoy (Reply 10): Keyword: **BETA** Damn, you fellas sure are critical. (I still prefer SG fromw hat I've seen)
Since when do websites require beta versions? If the site isn't ready, DON'T HOST IT!!! A website should only be put online when it is ready. What's the whole point of putting a site online if it's all wrong? What are people going to do, call up the webmaster if a hyperlink doesn't work? NO! Get the facts right, then host the site. In the meantime I'll stick with SeatGuru.
Airwave From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1117 posts, RR: 2
Reply 17, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 12496 times:
"LoveMySeat.com"? This site is going to have soooo many false hits from people who love their (or others) butts.
Quoting Werdywerd (Reply 6): It's a Beta release guys which means that they know there are still errors contained on their site and are not done building it up yet. Give it some time Smile
*Everything* is a beta these days. Look at just about every Google product out there and a lot of other internet-based stuff. If this place goes to a release candidate, I'll be impressed. Not that I'll probably ever utilize this sight--I much prefer seatguru.
When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
Alaskaqantas From New Zealand, joined Dec 2005, 907 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (9 years 10 months 6 days ago) and read 11604 times:
I know that this is a BETA site an all, but there are so many little and BIG mistakes that I would think that they would wait a tad longer then open it, even if it still is BETA it might look a little better. But I think that if it gets its A into G then we have a REALLY good site.
if you want the site to be better I TELL EVERYONE TO SUBMIT REVIEWS ON SEATS, THEN THE SITE WILL BE HEAPS BETTER QUICKER!!!
to some people the sky is the limit, to aviation enthusiasts, its home!
Pawsleykat From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 1978 posts, RR: 10
Reply 24, posted (9 years 10 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 10498 times:
Quoting Azstagecoach (Reply 2): Also there's no indication on most seatmaps for why a seat is bad-- making seatguru a better choice (despite their infuriating site "upgrade")
Yeh, if you try to move your mouse over a seat, a box just comes up and tells you that you are looking @ a picture of a certain plane, e.g: Qantas B747-400. Some planes like the 'Zoom' B767-300 have little boxes saying "Seat Scorecard Review" and under it in a seperate box, "Rows: ***. Seats All: " I doesn't help much tho...