Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Oh, Those 727's!  
User currently offlineHappy-flier From Canada, joined Dec 1999, 299 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1310 times:

Man, am I ever taking a liking to the 727 lately! I've always liked it despite never having flown in one, but now that they're getting "classic" it's that much more of a treat to see them. Just early this morning while passing by YYZ I saw an AA 727 doing a very long T.O. run on 6R, and it was a very graceful sight to behold, as it lifted off slowly, very heavy evidently, with that characteristic smoky, crackly rumble!   And now just this evening another one took off, also flying low and flat but VERY fast...  

Long live the 727!


May the wind be always at your back . . . except during takeoff & landing.
16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineUS521 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 1174 times:

Well i'll have to totally agree with ya. I see the new Pan Am's 727's and every time i see them witht he White scheme and the winglets. It is truely a site to see especially after a rainshower when the contrails are spiriling of the flaps. It is a marvelous sight. I'd have to say the 727 is my fav plane. The Piper Tri Pacer close behind.
US521
(aka N365PA in chat room)


User currently offlineGreeneyes53787 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1154 times:

I am enjoying them more and more too. They are graceful and--almost elegant. They were designed to do what they did, and they did (and are doing) it quite well.

GE

ps-US521, a 727 with winglets? Boy have I been out of the loop.


User currently offlineWhippy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1145 times:

I'll bet that the soda can I'm drinking out of right now once was a tri-jet Boeing!!!
 


User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2795 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (14 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1141 times:

You can recognize a 727 by the extraordinary roar of its engines. I've spotted at SFO and watched numerous 727s taking off. Any plane's noise, even a 747's roar, pales in comparison to the blast from the good old 727!

User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1140 times:

I see a lot of them here at COS (UAL planes) and have flown on them plenty with TWA.

Very nice, very fast (once they get in the air). Took a while to get to like them but it's now a love affair.


User currently offlineB727-200 From Australia, joined Nov 1999, 1051 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (14 years 2 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 1131 times:


Stop it guys, you're making me cry  

B727-200.


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1114 times:

Last night me and my wife were at ALB for a while watching aircraft taking off and landing when we saw a Delta 727 taxiing and right behind it was a UPS RR RB211 powered 757. The tower told the Delta jet to move over so that the UPS jet can takeoff first. That aircraft on it's takeoff run only used half of the runway when it lifted it's nose. That was amazing that this aircraft can use only half of the runway while the other aircraft like the 727, 737, DC-9/MD-80, & F100s take the entire runway before lifting off. When it came time for the Delta 727 to takeoff that plane was so loud even though it had hush kits. It had a slow takeoff run and lifted it's nose almost at the end of the runway.

User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (14 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1107 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Back in the day before hushkits limited how much power can be used, I'm sure the 727 was able to takeoff at that "half a runway" point too. I was always under the impression that the 727, in its early form (without hushkits, etc), was also overpowered (like the 757), and one of the fastest subsonic jets around.

Sammy


User currently offlineAleksandar From Serbia, joined Jul 2000, 3236 posts, RR: 32
Reply 9, posted (14 years 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1103 times:

One of the best airliners ever built. Good to fly with,and treat to watch it. There are still eight of them in JAT and three in Aviogenex, and I hope they will be used for few more years.


R-E-S-P-E-C-T
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 2282 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (14 years 2 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 1102 times:

Yes, many 727s, especially cargo carriers and charters, have winglets to increase fuel efficiency. It's a sight to behold.


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8003 posts, RR: 5
Reply 11, posted (14 years 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1085 times:

I have a question for all you 727 fans (pun not intended   ).

A few years ago, when 727-200's took off from Runway 1R at SFO, the roar of the three engines was totally deafening, to say the least! I've noticed that the Delta and Sun Country 727-200's that take off from that same runway nowadays aren't so noisy anymore. Has there been a rush to hush-kit the JT8D engines on thoses planes lately?


User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (14 years 2 weeks ago) and read 1068 times:

In an issue of the magazine AIRWAYS, I believe either the MAY, JUN or JUL 2000 issue, there is a good article on the new Pan Am based at the former Pease AFB, NH with their hushkitted 727-200s equipped with winglets.

User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1058 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Ray, you could probably say there was a rush, since aircraft had to meet Stage 3 Noise regulations by the end of 1999. So many airlines either retired their non-compliant aircraft or hushkitted them.

Sammy


User currently offlineAKelley728 From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 2191 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

RayChuang:

On December 31st 1999 was the last day in the US that airlines could fly non-Stage III (noise restriction)complaint aircraft.

To comply with regulations, Aircraft such as the 727 or 737-200 could either:

1. Get Hushkitted (Delta, American, etc.)

2. Re-engine them (UPS)

3. Do nothing, but then have a severe weight restriction so the JT8Ds wouldn't have to be a max take-off power. In this case, as long as the noise generated by a certain take-off power setting doesn't cross the 'Stage III' threshold, then you're okay.

So to answer your question, yes, there was a big rush at the last year to get aircraft compliant with Stage III.


User currently offlineGreeneyes53787 From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 844 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1028 times:

727s are pretty fast even now. They were designed to compete with the 880's original reason for living--short take-offs and plenty of speed. In actuality they could cruise almost as fast as an 880 but they couldn't get to that speed and altitude nearly as quickly. They were wider with the same thrust. 880s could push 44,000 lbs at high exhaust speed. 727s could push 45,000 lbs at moderate exhaust speed.

I am not a commercial pilot though. Pilots know more.

GE


User currently offlineTrintocan From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2000, 3238 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (14 years 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1016 times:

Oh yes, those 727s. Quite graceful planes and sights to behold on the ground and in the air. I have flown on 727s several times (EA, AA, UA) and have found them to be quite comfortable. Those planes have really survived the tests of time and service and continue to serve their owners well. I think that the 727 is well on its way to becoming the DC-3 equivalent of the jet age, greatly outselling its rivals and outlasting them (eg Trident, Mercure).

By the way, a question. Who actually outfits the 727s with winglets? Is there a company offering such upgrades? I saw a 727-200 here owned by Amerijet which featured the winglets (it was the first 727 with winglets that I have ever seen).

 
Trintocan.



Hop to it, fly for life!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Oh Those Russians posted Mon Nov 13 2000 13:36:57 by Airmale
Boeing 727: 25 Years Out Of Production posted Fri Sep 4 2009 21:20:10 by American 767
About Those Counter Scales... posted Thu Aug 6 2009 15:50:23 by Glbltrvlr
Help Identify 727 Please posted Wed Jul 29 2009 08:43:27 by CodyKDiamond
AeroSur 727 At JFK Today (7/19) posted Sun Jul 19 2009 17:02:37 by TR1
The Official "Oh No...More T-Storms In NYC" Diversion Thread posted Tue Jul 7 2009 13:10:01 by RP TPA
Help Me Identify A 727. posted Mon Jul 6 2009 08:53:24 by HangarRat
One Time DL Plan To Let OH Fly 737s? posted Sat Jun 27 2009 20:17:30 by LHCVG
DL/OH Drops PHL-BOS After July 31 posted Fri Jun 26 2009 13:34:59 by PHLBOS
727 Pax Service "Deep" South America-U.S.? posted Sun May 31 2009 21:01:10 by Tango-Bravo