Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JAL MD-80's/90's Future?  
User currently offline717fan From Switzerland, joined Nov 2001, 2017 posts, RR: 6
Posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3636 times:

Does anyone knows for how long JAL will fly its MD-80's and 90's?
Thanks

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 3628 times:

Doesnt JAL have a good number of 737NG aircraft on order? My guess would be that JAL will, over time, replace its own 734 fleet, plus the MD80/90 fleet it inherited from JAS, with the 737NG family - primarily 738 models and maybe some 739ER variants.

User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3599 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 3537 times:

JAL will move to having a fleet consisting of 737s, 787s, 777s and possibly if needed 747s. However they have stated they will do what NH is doing and use 773ERs in place of 747s. 737s will start doing domestic and short international (to Korea and China). The MDs will be gone in a few years.


Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 3473 times:

The most sensible scenario would be to first phase out the older MD-80s before moving onto the MD-90s then the 734s.
JL is anything but sensible these days, so they may pull the MD11/DC10 trick on us by replacing the newer plane first.


User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 3401 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 3):
The most sensible scenario would be to first phase out the older MD-80s before moving onto the MD-90s then the 734s.
JL is anything but sensible these days, so they may pull the MD11/DC10 trick on us by replacing the newer plane first.

To the contrary, JAL was very sensible in disposing of its MD11 fleet ahead of its DC10 fleet - its about money and the second hand market. It was far easier for JAL to dispose of its MD11s; as you probably know, MD11s are in rather high demand for freighter conversions adn JAL probably did well financially on the sale of the MD11s.......as for the PW powered DC10s, in all likelihood, those aircraft will be broken up and become Pepsi cans as little to no second market exists for these airplanes, just ask NW.


User currently offlineViasa From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 1900 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3380 times:

Four of the former JAS MD-81 flies with JAL Express.

User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3304 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 4):

Good points. The only ex-JL DC-10s flying are with Aeroflot cargo and one that was converted to an aerial tanker.

Quoting Viasa (Reply 5):

Actually, the MD-81s you mentioned have JAL Express (JEX) titles but all the MD-81s have the same configuration and used on both JAL & JEX flights.
This is the same with its 734 which some flies for JEX or Japan Trans Ocean. Though the configs do vary on the 734s as some were bought second-hand, which the second-hand airframes ones seat more.


User currently offlineAA1818 From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Feb 2006, 3439 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3293 times:

Quoting Centrair (Reply 2):
JAL will move to having a fleet consisting of 737s, 787s, 777s and possibly if needed 747s.

Presumably their 744 fleet is decreasing and they are looking to use the 77Wsto replace them. Is there really a need for JAL to operate 747s??

JAL have about 50 737NGs on order that were placed with the 787 order. How many 737 classics and MD's are we talking about replacing here??? Fleet numbers??

AA1818



“The moment you doubt whether you can fly, you cease for ever to be able to do it.” J.M. Barrie (Peter Pan)
User currently offlineDutchjet From Netherlands, joined Oct 2000, 7864 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3285 times:

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 7):

Presumably their 744 fleet is decreasing and they are looking to use the 77Wsto replace them. Is there really a need for JAL to operate 747s??

AA1818

Thats a question that has not yet been answered - JAL had/has a huge 747 fleet and has operated many different variants of the 747 - there are certain high demand routes that probably will continue to require an aircraft in the 747 category, especially out of slot-controlled Narita. I think that JAL will eventually order a good number of 748i aircraft to replace at least a portion of its 744 fleet.


User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3599 posts, RR: 20
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 3283 times:

Quoting Dutchjet (Reply 8):

Thats a question that has not yet been answered - JAL had/has a huge 747 fleet and has operated many different variants of the 747 - there are certain high demand routes that probably will continue to require an aircraft in the 747 category, especially out of slot-controlled Narita. I think that JAL will eventually order a good number of 748i aircraft to replace at least a portion of its 744 f

The thing is that JL is reducing the size and as they enter Oneworld, they will use more codeshare. Many of the Oz-Japan flights will become QF/JL codes, HKG flights will go CX/JL codes and London flights have been reduced and are becoming BA/JL codes. JL is only a shadow of its former self. They are reducing capacity so they can make a profit. Maybe they will order a few 748i but I think they will go with more 773ERs.



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineSKY1 From Spain, joined Apr 2006, 879 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3245 times:

Quoting Centrair (Reply 9):
Many of the Oz-Japan flights will become QF/JL codes

Does anyone know if the code share JL-NZ will continue on a short-term?



Time flies! Enjoy life!
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3234 times:

In my opinion with the downsizing of JL, the 748 order will probably be for both pax and freighter versions or not at all. Hence pegged most likely on the 742F replacement.
If they decide to go entirely with 744 conversions for its 742F replacement, then it makes no sense to have a small fleet of 748 pax for trunk routes. Only a combined 748 freight and pax fleet would allow the justification to introduce a new aircraft type.

Quoting SKY1 (Reply 10):
Does anyone know if the code share JL-NZ will continue on a short-term?

Yes, NZ is the lone Star Alliance carrier staying in T2 at NRT when the refurbished T1 opens.

Quoting AA1818 (Reply 7):
JAL have about 50 737NGs on order that were placed with the 787 order. How many 737 classics and MD's are we talking about replacing here??? Fleet numbers??

8 - MD-87
18 - MD-81
16 - MD-90
23 - 734 (JL group)


User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3599 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3228 times:

Quoting Carpethead (Reply 11):
Yes, NZ is the lone Star Alliance carrier staying in T2 at NRT when the refurbished T1 opens.

Why are they not moving? Kind of defeats the purpose of being in Star. They can't take good advantage of domestic connections. BAKA!!!!



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineCarpethead From Japan, joined Aug 2004, 2980 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3226 times:

Quoting Centrair (Reply 12):
Why are they not moving?

Because, NZ will continue to codeshare with JL.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA And Delta MD-80/90 Replacements posted Wed Feb 15 2006 21:11:10 by 1337Delta764
Low-bypass Jets - MD-80/90 posted Thu Aug 18 2005 05:35:05 by Adipasqu
Production Numbers- B73 "classics" Vs. MD 80/90? posted Thu Jun 30 2005 16:55:42 by Brucek
Any Winglet Kits In The Works For DC-9 (MD-80/90)? posted Wed Mar 16 2005 02:19:31 by Mason
MD-80/90 Freighter Conversions posted Fri Feb 27 2004 08:48:53 by Flying-Tiger
MD-80/90 Seating Arrangement posted Fri Oct 10 2003 23:45:01 by FlyPIJets
Future Of JAS MD-80/90's? posted Fri Nov 15 2002 20:33:58 by 717fan
MD-80/90/717 Cargo Plane? posted Sun Jan 27 2002 19:36:36 by 717fan
MD-80/90 Series posted Wed Apr 18 2001 03:29:26 by Ejaymd11
MD-80,90 posted Sat Dec 30 2000 09:53:20 by TRIPLE8