Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Blue Has New Controlling Shareholder  
User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3261 times:

Saturdays Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that the Toll bid for Patricks has suddenly succeded on Friday. See:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/...rick/2006/04/14/1144521506700.html

Which means DJ has a new controlling shareholder and deals with Sir Richard are likley. For details see:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/...take/2006/04/14/1144521506723.html

Gemuser


DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8114 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3249 times:

I hear Branson's losing his shirt with the Virgin Atlantic flight to Sydney, which absolutely amazes me, he could be kicking arse with Virgin Blue's domestic feed, shared flight numbers for (say) Hobart-London or Canberra-London, it involves changing terminals but the same is true if you fly QF or BA with domestic connections. He could have a great set up in Oz but doesn't seem to be persuing it - get Virgin Blue flying to LA, there's an RTW network with plenty of feed in both directions, to LA and to Europe / vv. (Also on 'things to do list': buy British Midland for a quid.)


fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3244 times:

I seem to recall reading somewhere that SRB wanted this to happen as well. Apparently there was a falling out between him and Patricks

User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 3229 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 1):
I hear Branson's losing his shirt with the Virgin Atlantic flight to Sydney

From what I hear, its not LHR-SYD-LHR that is loosing money, but HKG-SYD-HKG. That is the whole flight is profitable, but not the HKG-SYD sector. Given the load factor and yeilds on LHR-HKG, this is belivable. That is substainable for a while, but not indefinately.

Is the second LHR-HKG flight happening? If that improves things, then LHR-SYD should still be there when SYD-LAX is ready. Although Toll could delay/screw things up, see second article in thread starter.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8114 posts, RR: 53
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3191 times:

Quoting Gemuser (Reply 3):
From what I hear, its not LHR-SYD-LHR that is loosing money, but HKG-SYD-HKG. That is the whole flight is profitable, but not the HKG-SYD sector. Given the load factor and yeilds on LHR-HKG, this is belivable.

So what you're saying is, LHR-HKG is really popular and there aren't enough seats in the system to accomodate both destinations? LHR-HKG is so busy that two thirds of the seats on the second leg are empty cos people who wanted to fly right through to Sydney couldn't be accomodated on the first leg to Honkers?

In which case, a second LHR-HKG terminator will be good if they can get it. I wonder if they considered moving the Sydney flight to a different stopover in Asia, and added a new station at the same time, ie Kuala Lumpur or Chennai.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3096 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 4):
So what you're saying is, LHR-HKG is really popular and there aren't enough seats in the system to accomodate both destinations? LHR-HKG is so busy that two thirds of the seats on the second leg are empty cos people who wanted to fly right through to Sydney couldn't be accomodated on the first leg to Honkers?

My understanding of the sitution is that that is exactly what happens. Hence the desire for a second terminating flight.

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 4):
In which case, a second LHR-HKG terminator will be good if they can get it. I wonder if they considered moving the Sydney flight to a different stopover in Asia, and added a new station at the same time, ie Kuala Lumpur or Chennai.

While in theory a good idea, it is difficult to pull off. I think VS still serve KL via a code share on MH or this may have ceased. One of the Malaysian member was saying in another thread that a UK carrier would have problems getting into Malaysia, I admit I did not understand what he ment, so I dont know. Also other bilaterals can be problems, I dont know if a service via India would fit into the Uks agreements with both India and Australia.


Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineFlyjetstar From Australia, joined Feb 2006, 954 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 3068 times:

Quoting Gemuser (Thread starter):
Which means DJ has a new controlling shareholder and deals with Sir Richard are likley. For details see:

I am wondering what kind of deals there would be. I know there was a pre-existing agreement between Little and Branson but I heard a radio report yesterday confirming the article comments and it left me wondering if there might be trouble ahead for Branson and that it might not be as easy as Branson is hoping. Can the agreement be broken/changed/altered in anyway?


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8451 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2977 times:

Quoting Flyjetstar (Reply 6):
I am wondering what kind of deals there would be. I know there was a pre-existing agreement between Little and Branson but I heard a radio report yesterday confirming the article comments and it left me wondering if there might be trouble ahead for Branson and that it might not be as easy as Branson is hoping. Can the agreement be broken/changed/altered in anyway?

The agreement only kicked in once Toll gained control of Patrick. While the board has agreed and the ACCC has agreed in principal to the deal, one would assume that the agreement dosn't fully kick in untill all shareholder and regulatory approvals are gained. After the transaction is complete the SMH article seems to suggest that Toll can sell to Virgin at its leisure, and gives them a discount on upto 15% of share purchased. The article also seems to suggest that Toll has upto 1 month after gaining control of Patrick to conlcude a deal with Virgin, otherwise penalties are to be paid to Virgin.


User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1619 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2961 times:

Quoting Cedarjet (Reply 4):
So what you're saying is, LHR-HKG is really popular and there aren't enough seats in the system to accomodate both destinations? LHR-HKG is so busy that two thirds of the seats on the second leg are empty cos people who wanted to fly right through to Sydney couldn't be accomodated on the first leg to Honkers?

thats apparantly correct, a second HKG frequency by VS is apparently planned for later this year.

Having said that, I flew HKG-SYD in J on VS in Feb, and it was full, not one seat spare.


User currently offlineAerofan From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 1517 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 2866 times:

I also flew VS LHR-HKG-SYD last Novemeber. It was a superb flight and as you experienced Richard, all 45 seats in J were taken both going an coming. This routes seems to be quite profitable to Virgin

User currently offlineCrosscountry From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 2837 times:

Sunday Times here in the UK reported SRB is ready to make a deal to take a controlling share in Virgin Blue.

User currently offlineMaartenV From Netherlands, joined Aug 2005, 271 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 2809 times:

Why did he sell his controlling share anyway? Isn't the whole idea of having a global network of airlines, like Virgin, to work together and benefit from eachother. Shared marketing campaigns (a big piece of the flying public will link them anyway), buy fuel together, code-share and keep the brand reputation at a high level. When you loose control over a company that bears the same name and operates in the samen business, as a company you do still control, you risk problems. I've met a lot of people who confuse Virgin Express from BRU, with Virgin Atlantic (which was in those cases bad for Virgin Atlantic), although these companies have little more in common then their name.


Its all about supply and demand...
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 2761 times:

If there is a capacity issue, why doesn't VS operate the 747-400 on the route? Passenger -400s shouldn't be hard to come by.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 59
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 2707 times:

of interest..........

fair use excerpt:

"Temasek recently dumped its 3% share in Qantas after the Australian government rejected SIA's annual bid to gain access to the Australia-US market (ATWOnline, Feb. 22). Analysts suggest that Temasek may team up with Branson to gain a controlling stake in Virgin Blue, with Virgin Group holding 40% and Temasek 49%.

Services to the US probably would be launched with 747s leased from SIA, swapping to 777s once operational experience allowed ETOPS."

http://www.atwonline.com/news/story.html?storyID=4737



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 2582 times:

Very interesting indeed! Is it certain that Virgin Blue will be allowed to operate to the US? I know that the only carriers flying between the two countries are Qantas and United.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineRichard28 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2003, 1619 posts, RR: 6
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week ago) and read 2545 times:

Quoting CX747 (Reply 12):
If there is a capacity issue, why doesn't VS operate the 747-400 on the route? Passenger -400s shouldn't be hard to come by.

I think its been said before that it could be the A346 has holds more cargo than the 744.

VS have not got many 744's based at LHR now, so to put 3 on the LHR-HKG-SYD route would also mean a cut in capacity (particularly in the Y cabin) on some other (mainly North American) routes.


User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2479 times:

Quoting CX747 (Reply 14):
Very interesting indeed! Is it certain that Virgin Blue will be allowed to operate to the US? I know that the only carriers flying between the two countries are Qantas and United.

There are currently 3 US airline operating between the US and Australia. UA LAX/SFO-SYD/MEL, HA HNL-SYD & CO GUM-CNS. So another couple of Oz airlines should not be a problem.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4454 posts, RR: 5
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2459 times:

How many carriers from each country operate LAX/SFO-SYD/MEL? Is there a restriction in place?


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5664 posts, RR: 6
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 2454 times:

Quoting CX747 (Reply 17):
How many carriers from each country operate LAX/SFO-SYD/MEL? Is there a restriction in place?

NO restriction is in place except you have to operate a minimum of 4 services per week (ie the airline has to operate 4 per week, not 4 per week per route.)

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Australia's Virgin Blue Orders 9 New 737 Planes posted Wed May 10 2006 06:50:21 by Leelaw
When Will Virgin Blue Order New Aircraft? posted Wed Oct 9 2002 04:23:54 by CX747
Virgin Blue Has 3 Bidders posted Tue Nov 27 2001 07:21:32 by Wirraway
Virgin Atlantic Has Sent Airbus New Proposal posted Fri Oct 13 2006 16:16:52 by Osiris30
Virgin Blue's New Embraer And 777 Fleet? posted Tue Aug 22 2006 00:06:12 by Aussie_
Virgin Blue Under Fire For New Wheelchair Policy posted Wed May 31 2006 00:53:32 by HKGKaiTak
New Special Colourschemes For Virgin Blue, Jetstar posted Tue Jul 19 2005 00:01:57 by Aussie_
Virgin Blue New Aircraft? posted Mon Oct 18 2004 16:22:37 by TBA04
Could Virgin Blue Buy 25% Air New Zealand? posted Wed Jul 14 2004 13:19:53 by Qantaspower
New NAS Blamed For Virgin Blue Near-miss posted Wed Dec 3 2003 23:04:12 by Bd1959