Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Proposing the A320 enhanced performance  
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18377 times:

An interim Airbus narrowbody, A320EP "Enhanced Performance" to meet airline demand for lower fuel costs and more range and capacity. Many airline just can´t wait for 7 to 10 years for a brand new design. IES Q2 2008.

Specifications A320EP
Length: 41m
OEW: 44.500kg
MTOW: 87.000kg
Range: 3300nm

The aircraft is stretched 3.5m compared to the A320, 3.5m short of the A321. New elliptical winglets are fitted, the fuselage stretch provides airlines room to fit an additional 4 seatrows or 24 seats at 34 inch seat pitch compared to the A320.

Cockpit
The cockpit incorporates evolutionary improvements in the latest A320 series. More drastic improvements are avoided to retain 100% commonality with the large worldwide A320 fleet, pilots and support networks.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Darren Howie



Engines
The EP´s engines are CFM56-9´s, an evolutionairy development of the CFM56-5 and -7 versions. Most significant difference is the 10% larger fan cross section, resulting in a 20% higher by-pass ratio. The fan has a 3-D woven composite fan and a reduced number of blades. Other enhancements are the new light fan case and twin annular pre-swirl combustor intended to lower NOx emissions. Results are a 12% lower fuel and 20% lower maintenance costs.


Cabin enhancements
Most significant improvement in the cabin is the use of natural light. 6 Rooftop windows provide natural light and a view on the blue sky for all. The roof window can be filtered, dimmed or shut completely by the crew. New luggage bins offer 15% more space and form a naturally integrated part of the cabin. New side panels give passengers a few extra inches of cabin width.

Backgrounds
The A320EP (Enhanced Performance) is developed to meet increased market demand for addition range and seats. The A320EP is a stretched, re-engined A320 incorporating many improvements developed over the last decennium. Investments in the design are estimated at E1.2 billion.

Click to enlarge
http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/photos/big/00007055.jpg

Artist: Henry Lam, great! http://www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos/



Folks, all completely made up, any kind of relation with reality is purely coincidental  Wink

31 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineA319XFW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18347 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
Folks, all completely made up, any kind of relation with reality is purely coincidental

It must be getting late in Holland and you're starting to hallucinate or are really bored...! Big grin
I would disprove your claims, but it's getting a bit late and I'm off to bed!  yawn 


User currently offlineBestWestern From Hong Kong, joined Sep 2000, 6957 posts, RR: 57
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18318 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
Folks, all completely made up, any kind of relation with reality is purely coincidental

Can I nickname it the Airbus Binliner.....



The world is really getting smaller these days
User currently offlineBoysteve From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18318 times:

That's great, but, err, what is the point exactly?

User currently offlineNorCal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18237 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):

I don't understand the point of the stretch? Won't airlines want to keep the current amount of seats in their A320s? Everything else sounds great and these improvements will clearly put it beyond the 737 unless Boeing has some magic up its sleeve (doubt it though the 737 has pretty much seen all the improvement possible). Does Airbus have an official press release yet or is this something that has been leaked?


User currently offlineStirling From Italy, joined Jun 2004, 3943 posts, RR: 22
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18215 times:

Quoting NorCal (Reply 4):
Does Airbus have an official press release yet or is this something that has been leaked?

He was joking....it is not real. Still, some good ideas.



Delete this User
User currently offlineNorCal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 week 1 day ago) and read 18161 times:

Quoting Stirling (Reply 5):
He was joking....it is not real. Still, some good ideas

Oh ok, yeah I agree these are some very good ideas. The winglets alone would probably cut 1-3% in few burn.


User currently offlineMham001 From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 3391 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 18116 times:

If they could get 12% better fuel burn just from the engines, we'd see a brand new 737 in no time.

User currently offlineAzza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 18081 times:

hehe, i should post things like this on a.net, im on modified airliner photos all the time. i see a great mod, like henry lams A320EP, and a week later (not a week on this one, bout 3 days) it is one here!

Aaron  sly 



Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 915 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 18057 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
Investments in the design are estimated at E1.2 billion.

Why invest such a large sum in an aircraft that is selling at record volumes and would likely be replaced in its entirety within just a few years?


User currently offlineAzza40 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2006, 1052 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 18031 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 9):
Why invest such a large sum in an aircraft that is selling at record volumes and would likely be replaced in its entirety within just a few years?

they arent really making it, it is a modification. hence the website where he found it, www.cardatabase.net/modifiedairlinerphotos

Aaron  sly 



Not been on here for a good 2/3 years!
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 915 posts, RR: 51
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 17989 times:

Quoting Azza40 (Reply 10):
they arent really making it, it is a modification. hence the website where he found it,

Good grief... I totally overlooked that. What ever was I thinking  Yeah sure


User currently offlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7526 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 17741 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
New elliptical winglets are fitted

On the subject of elliptical winglets, I read a couple of years ago in the AM in-flight magazine that Boeing was considering a new type of device to place on the wingtips to maximize aerodynamics in future models. The illustration on the magazine showed a spiral kind of device in lieu of blended winglets or wingtip fences. AM's magazine also mentioned that several airlines around the world, including AM, were collaborating with Boeing in the research of this and other types of aerodynamic enhancers. Has anyone heard anything about this recently?



Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineJohnny From Sweden, joined Jan 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 week 21 hours ago) and read 17618 times:

Keesje,

i heard that a lot of coffee-shops in your country were closed.Can´t believe that after reading your thread... Wink

Johnny  Smile


User currently offlineAntoniemey From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1531 posts, RR: 4
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 17502 times:

Cute joke. All I can say about the image is DAMN those winglets are big!

Still... might be a good idea for Airbus to consider...



Make something Idiot-proof, and the Universe will make a more inept idiot.
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12444 posts, RR: 100
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 17385 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
Engines
The EP´s engines are CFM56-9´s, an evolutionairy development of the CFM56-5 and -7 versions. Most significant difference is the 10% larger fan cross section, resulting in a 20% higher by-pass ratio. The fan has a 3-D woven composite fan and a reduced number of blades. Other enhancements are the new light fan case and twin annular pre-swirl combustor intended to lower NOx emissions. Results are a 12% lower fuel and 20% lower maintenance costs.

Keesje,

First, the idea of a much lower fuel burn quick release A320 has its merits. (Man, I'm agreeing with you... I knew I shouldn't have had that 6th cup of coffee...) However, I will point out a fan diameter change while required for fuel economy isn't trivial. Although if such a larger fan could fit with the A320 current landing gear (only if the stretch allowed moving the engine forward and up: a center of gravity/wing aerodynamics consideration) then IAE would also put on a larger fan. Trust me, that group isn't behind GE in fan tech.  Wink

Don't forget in (IIRC) 2008 the IAE V2500 gets a fuel burn reduction.
current V2527 TSFC=.575
CFM-56-5b (most fuel efficient CFM-56)=.596

Now, 12% would be HUGE! TSFC < 0.500 in a single isle.  cloudnine 
Sorry, but a fan change alone won't do it. (More like 3% drop in fuel burn.)

Add contra rotation (but that wouldn't be a CFM-56...) drop another 3 to 4%
New High spool with a 2nd high turbine, drop fuel burn another 4%
Optimize the low spool... another 2%. So 12% is doable. But only by throwing in all the new technology. Ok... a GTF could drop fuel burn even more.  spin  Damn it Pratt or IAE, launch it!  hissyfit 

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
New elliptical winglets are fitted,

I love the idea... but needs further proving. I'm afraid I haven't seen any data and thus cannot comment further about the risk to benifits.

The attention this gets only points out that at $70+/bbl oil, something needs to change!

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4252 posts, RR: 29
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 week 18 hours ago) and read 17266 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
6 Rooftop windows provide natural light and a view on the blue sky for all

In addition to some of the other drawbacks pointed out by others, wouldn't these six large windows add a lot of weight? Not to mention the fact that you're going to lose a lot of insulative properties as well. And all for some additional lighting? Seems to me some of the newer LED bulbs placed in the cabin ceiling would be more efficient and practical.



I'm not a racist...I hate Biden, too.
User currently offlineCharvett From Venezuela, joined May 2001, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 17222 times:

Some of this thread was discussed long ago. I posted and still stick
to Airbus Industrie for this: A-321 fuselage, beefed and straightened
wings with a 5ft tip extension, four engines (IAE variations). What do you
think?


User currently offlineAntoniemey From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1531 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 17161 times:

Quoting Charvett (Reply 18):
four engines (IAE variations)

That right there would make it inefficient compared to its competitors. Next up?



Make something Idiot-proof, and the Universe will make a more inept idiot.
User currently offlineNorCal From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2459 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (8 years 1 week 9 hours ago) and read 16029 times:

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
The aircraft is stretched 3.5m compared to the A320, 3.5m short of the A321. New elliptical winglets are fitted, the fuselage stretch provides airlines room to fit an additional 4 seatrows or 24 seats at 34 inch seat pitch compared to the A320.

Didn't B6 want a stretched A320? Something like an A320.5? Hypothetically speaking would 3.5m be enough to satisfy their need?


User currently offlineLawnDart From United States of America, joined May 2005, 968 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (8 years 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 15717 times:

Quoting A319XFW (Reply 1):
I would disprove your claims, but it's getting a bit late and I'm off to bed!

Nice little hit-and-run statement.

Well, make sure you get plenty of rest and are nice and sharp in the morning, because I for one would love to see how you "disprove" a fictional enhancement anyway.

Some of the points brought up in the A320 Enhanced are actually rather intriguing...


User currently offlineCharvett From Venezuela, joined May 2001, 82 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 15034 times:

About four engine's inefficiency... I know I know... but I'm
referring to a proyect similar to the A-330/340 one.


User currently offlineA319XFW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 14798 times:

Right, have had some sleep, so here goes Big grin

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
The aircraft is stretched 3.5m compared to the A320, 3.5m short of the A321

Why stretch when there are already 4 versions of different fuselage length.

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
Most significant difference is the 10% larger fan cross section,

As Lightsaber already said - a 10% increase in fan diametre will not only affect the fan, but might also affect the landing gear. Assuming this, you'd need a certain clearance from the ground. This would mean you might need a longer landing gear. There are a few problems with this.
The space needed to put it in isn't there, so you'd need a shortening mechanism, which is a big no-no as it increases complexity.

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
6 Rooftop windows provide natural light and a view on the blue sky for all.

As already said above, windows increase stress concentration. You'd also have to re-new the tooling for the panels. And re-route the wiring that goes up there.

Quoting Keesje (Thread starter):
The A320EP is a stretched, re-engined A320 incorporating many improvements developed over the last decennium. Investments in the design are estimated at E1.2 billion.

And here you say why it's just made-up and won't be done. Also resource (read engineers) to do such modifications (especially on the L/G) aren't there.

All nice ideas, but at the moment not do-able. And why change a well-selling product, when a new one is somewhere in the near future.


User currently offlineFlyDreamliner From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 2759 posts, RR: 15
Reply 23, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 14403 times:

Quoting Mham001 (Reply 7):
If they could get 12% better fuel burn just from the engines, we'd see a brand new 737 in no time.

Those would be some impressive engines. Goodluck doing it just with a fan. We'll be seeing a new 737 in no time anyhow the way it sounds.

Quoting Antoniemey (Reply 14):
Cute joke. All I can say about the image is DAMN those winglets are big!

Still... might be a good idea for Airbus to consider...

No kidding. He should go to Toulouse and help them out.

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 15):
Add contra rotation (but that wouldn't be a CFM-56...) drop another 3 to 4%
New High spool with a 2nd high turbine, drop fuel burn another 4%
Optimize the low spool... another 2%. So 12% is doable. But only by throwing in all the new technology. Ok... a GTF could drop fuel burn even more. spin Damn it Pratt or IAE, launch it! hissyfit

I hope IAE (which includes Pratt) will come up with a competitive engine for the next generation A320. My guess is CFM will cook up a bleedless, counter-rotating all new cored engine for the Y3, which could likely be made bleed for A320 (airbus prefer bleed systems, apparently), IAE seems to have a better relationship with Airbus than with Boeing, who is very loyal to CFM.



"Let the world change you, and you can change the world"
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 1 week 1 hour ago) and read 13588 times:

Quoting DfwRevolution (Reply 9):
Why invest such a large sum in an aircraft that is selling at record volumes

Additional marketshare, capturing major operators when they don´t have an alternative.

Quoting Azza40 (Reply 10):
hence the website where he found it

Henry was kind enough to create it based on my spec.

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 12):
On the subject of elliptical winglets, I read a couple of years ago in the AM in-flight magazine

Airbus will test them soon. Winglet Technologies designed them.
http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...7/205890/A320+tests++winglets.html

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 15):
Sorry, but a fan change alone won't do it.

True. It is a combination of introducing a variety of new technologies on a not really young engine. Shape, pressure ratios, 3D flow optimalizations etc..

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles.../199908/Engine+makers+gear+up.html

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 15):
Ok... a GTF could drop fuel burn even more.

You Pratt guys sure have a long breath   On Pratt fan technology, they did the GP7200.

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 15):
The attention this gets only points out that at $70+/bbl oil, something needs to change!

Right on. Circumstances have changed, business cases too.

Quoting RedFlyer (Reply 16):
wouldn't these six large windows add a lot of weight?

The aircraft has more then 80 windows. Recently I had a complete cut out 747 window set in my hands. 35 yrs old design; amazingly light! Composites are able to make them even lighter, the rules have changed.
http://www.boeing.com/randy/images/787_window_lg.jpg

Quoting A319XFW (Reply 22):
Why stretch when there are already 4 versions of different fuselage length.

I guess DC9 & 737 showed the way. It fills a big gab & provides natural growth & network flexibility.

Quoting A319XFW (Reply 22):
This would mean you might need a longer landing gear.

Wing pylon needs modification anyway (moving cg, light fan/casing). Ground clearance is tight but not as tight as e.g. with the 737NG.

[Edited 2006-04-18 22:52:33]

25 RedFlyer : Yes, but those 80 windows are relatively small. Put in big windows and the weight increases substantially. Why do you think an airplane is built with
26 A319XFW : I don't think they'll want to do that after they just did it.
27 Post contains images Keesje : Pressure from the market is rising on both Boeing and Airbus to come up with improvements on thier established B737 / A320 lines. They put it on at Pr
28 Post contains images Lightsaber : FYI, "Shape" usually involves a new casting. While new pressure vessel castings have already occured on the CFM-56... its an expensive step to take.
29 A319XFW : Like Lightsaber says, it depends on what you mean by "an upgrade". There are always upgrades being done on the aircraft. Some you'll notice (e.g. win
30 FlyDreamliner : Seems to me while Pratt has been seeking a miracle with GTF, GE, and now RR have been working on revolutionary new fan designs (like that used in GE9
31 Post contains links and images Keesje : The 12% lower fuel burn estimate I mentioned was supposed to be for the complete aircraft at a per seat basis. I put it in the wrong place & saw it t
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will China Reverse Engineer The A320? posted Thu Oct 26 2006 15:37:08 by Dougloid
A320 Enhanced Interior - When? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 12:04:42 by Vasu
Frontier And The A320 posted Thu Aug 3 2006 05:59:17 by Flinhion757
The Winglets In The A320 posted Tue Jul 4 2006 00:38:48 by Flymario
If It Was'nt For The A320 Where Would Airbus Be posted Tue Jun 27 2006 14:32:01 by Malb777
Minor New Airbus Model - The A320-216 posted Sun Jun 25 2006 22:35:28 by Ptrjong
Leahy: Airbus Aims At A320 Enhanced posted Mon Jun 19 2006 11:22:28 by Leelaw
Why Did United Choose The A320 Family? posted Thu Apr 6 2006 19:31:57 by United787
Happy 19th Birthday To The A320! posted Wed Feb 22 2006 03:05:44 by RoseFlyer
Frontier Considers The A320 posted Thu Dec 15 2005 04:01:22 by AirplaneBoy
Is The A320 Enhanced Still Coming? posted Tue Dec 25 2007 02:40:25 by Joram
Will We See EZY Use The A320 On Domestic Routes? posted Mon Jan 10 2011 06:09:19 by l33roy94
Can The A320 Overtake The B737? posted Sat Dec 11 2010 10:13:47 by Scipio
Is Airbus Reigning In Leahy And The A320 NEO posted Tue Oct 12 2010 13:24:01 by CFBFrame
Cyprus Airways And The A320.. posted Sat Dec 19 2009 17:25:21 by SXDFC
Re-engining The A320/737 Decision Next Year? posted Sun Oct 11 2009 05:10:23 by OyKIE
Airlines Operating Both The A320 And B737NG? posted Sat Mar 28 2009 01:59:55 by Virginblue4
Do TED Crews Get Trained To Handle The A320? posted Fri Jan 16 2009 06:13:46 by Enginebird
Skywest (Aus) & The A320 posted Sat Dec 20 2008 01:48:05 by Ben175
Air India Aids Awareness Livery On The A320(Pic) posted Wed Dec 5 2007 05:54:27 by Deaphen