Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
British Airways/Swissair - Possible Merger  
User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1686 times:

The UK's Financial Mail is today reporting that Swissair is weighing up plans to open up merger talks with British Airways, in competition with KLM. Swissair employed a leading consultancy firm to weigh up the benefits of a relationship with BA - the study found Swissair and British Airways are better suited as partners than BA/KLM.

BA still claims talks with KLM are on track. But the Swissair study maintains there would be fewer regulatory problems with a BA/SR link than BA/KL. Both the EC and USA will probably impose penalties on both BA and KLM should they merge to form the world's 3rd largest airline, including BA surrendering LHR slots or KLM ending it's alliance with KLM should BA refuse to do this.

Swissair would also better fit with BA's policy of targeting high-yield Premium passengers. KLM does not have a First Class cabin, and 70% of their passengers are economy travellers transfering from neighbouring countries. The Swissair study concluded a BA/KLM deal would increase the losses BA already suffers on their short-haul flights.

A Swissair merger will also allow BA to keep American Airlines as it's US partner, which is their prefered choice. Daniel Solon of aviation consultants Avmark said;
"Northwest is hardly BA's first choice as an American partner." I think he was being polite! Northwest has a poor image, an ageing fleet, no service to major Trans-Atlantic gateways such as JFK, BOS and LAX, and only serves one UK airport, Gatwick.
However BA is reported to have accepted that an alliance with Northwest is the price they will have to pay for KLM, although Rod Eddington is reportedly far from happy with this.

Swissair would also bring with it Sabena and Crossair. BA would also regain access to the French domestic market through Air Liberte/AOM, along with links to Turkish Airlines, Air Portugal, Air Europe and Portugalia.

Very interesting. I think Swissair are a much better partner for British Airways;
- More compatible image
- Fleets better matched
- Same US partner
- Fits BA's overall strategy better

I hope 2 of the world's best airlines can come to an agreement to allow them to continue to grow and provide excellent service to a growing number of passengers.

Regards
JET SETTER

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1644 times:

Online link to the full article;
Swissair may bust up BA party


User currently offlineTailscraper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

Uh, how is this going to affect BA Economy class fares to the US? I hope this merger doesn't mean BA starts to charge what it likes to Y class pax.



User currently offlineAvion From Bouvet Island, joined May 1999, 2205 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 1590 times:

I hope Swissair will start charging more competitive fares. What they charge is rip-off in all classes and yet they are full.

Example:
ZRH-LON-MIA British Airways 499 Francs
ZRH-MIA Swissair 1299 Francs

Avion


User currently offlineHL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days ago) and read 1585 times:

i think that they should merge with Swissair because it would be better for them and they would still have their favoured partners American Airlines and Qantas.

User currently offline747firstclass From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1582 times:

If by chance BA and Swissiar should merge, why would it be easier to get approval from the regulators? It would seem to me that the same old questions and problems from the BA/AA deal would come up again. Only more so by the presence of Swissair in the mix. I have heard that BA isnt ready to give up slots at LHR for US carriers to gain approval for the KLM merger. So why would they do it for Swissair, AA and so on. somebody please explain. My personal opinion is that this is all a ploy to avoid facing the issue of increased US compertition at LHR in the form of openskies. The sooner that BA realizes openskies will come the sooner they can get their act together.

User currently offlineTailscraper From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

....and stop charging ridiculous fares.

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5568 posts, RR: 35
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1554 times:

Swissair representatives denied this story (Teletext Swiss TV DRS). They said that there are no merger taks with BA.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
American-British Airways/Northwest-KLM Merger posted Mon Jun 5 2000 15:36:52 by DeltaAir
British Airways And KLM In 13.5B Merger Talks posted Mon Jun 11 2001 09:41:51 by QantasAirways
British Airways/KLM Merger! What Do U Think? posted Wed Jun 7 2000 10:49:43 by BritAir
British Airways / WestJet In Prelim. Talks posted Thu Dec 14 2006 21:28:44 by JBLUA320
British Airways #102 Flying "empty"? (YYC-LHR) posted Wed Dec 13 2006 03:54:29 by Vio
British Airways 777 At YYC - Pics posted Thu Dec 7 2006 08:01:20 by Vio
British Airways First Turndown Service posted Wed Dec 6 2006 20:38:26 by ClassicLover
British Airways Seat Requests Stopped? posted Wed Dec 6 2006 14:19:39 by SpeedBird203
British Airways To Fly Cardiff - New York JFK? posted Mon Dec 4 2006 01:55:13 by 8herveg
British Airways Seating Plan posted Tue Nov 28 2006 23:15:11 by Jonty