Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
4-engined 767  
User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1974 times:

Here's a four-engined Delta 767 I created. The first person to spot the giveaway will win the bagel next to me on my desk. I think it's stale. I don't want it anymore.




An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDan The Man From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1720 times:

Looks awesome dude, What photosuite did you use?

Dan The Man


User currently offlineCXA330-342 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 398 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1676 times:

I think that the wing belongs to the 747-400, and even if I am right, you can keep the bagel.  

User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 21
Reply 3, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 1645 times:

It's not a 744 because their is only one landing light on the wing. Did you superimpose another DL wing onto the first one?

Aaron G.


User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1631 times:

It's the repetition of the painted stipes on the ground and only the back half of the baggage cart under the #4 engine.

User currently offlineN863DA From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 48 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1615 times:

What he did was copy the engine and paste it. The bird scarer on the cone of the engine is in exactly the same position on the two engines - a hint that they are the same engine. Excellent job!


FLY DELTA JETS and sail UNITED STATES LINES



N 8 6 3 D A


User currently offlineB767-400er From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2000, 290 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1597 times:

I'm pretty sure that you put the same wing on the tip of the existing one, did you. Why I say this: The outboard engine is off axis!


Tony,
B767-400er  


User currently offlineB-787 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 273 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1586 times:

Don't you guys notice the different engine pylons.


722,732,73G,738,739,739ER,752,753,762,763,764,744,788,D10,M80,300,320
User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

Okay, N863DA and TWA717_200 were correct. They each get half the bagel. You want butter on that?

It is a duplicated engine grafted on to the existing wing. The giveaway to me was the repetiton of the baggage cart. I should have edited that out. I didn't notice the repetition of the marking lines, nor the swirl position on the engine! I'll do better next time.

However, I did not copy and paste it. In fact, I don't have any sophisticated software at all, other than Corel photohouse that came with Corel WordPerfect Suite 8. Nothing like what N863DA has. It's a very basic photo editing software, but I was board and just fooling around.
But I'll keep my process secret!

Hmmmm...



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1543 times:

I hope it's an onion bagel with cream cheese. I'm hungry.

User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1587 times:

Here's another one I created. This one is nearly flawless. The first person to prove it's a fake gets a fresh bagel. With cream cheese. Allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.

I hope the link does not expire.

Hmmmm...




An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineB767-400er From Hong Kong, joined Apr 2000, 290 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1540 times:

The Canada 3000 757's engines are way toooooo close together!!!


Tony,
B767-400er


User currently offlineSammyk From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1521 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The outboard engine seems to be canted a bit too to the left instead of straight like the inboard...also seems like the centerline for the nose gear (sorry, dont know the technical term) is duplicated behind the outboard engine.

Sammy


User currently offline777boy From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 287 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1511 times:

Nice job on the 757, but I found its flaw: The red marking is partially duplicated and appears under the #3 engine in a sort of triangular shape.

User currently offlineHamlet69 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2744 posts, RR: 58
Reply 14, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1499 times:

Great job Hmmmm...!

Your 767 is fabulous. For the 757, it is indeed almost perfect. However, I did spot one technical flaw:

There is no break in the spoiler above the outboard engine. You could never be able to extend the main spoiler completely, as it would hit the pylon.

Keep it up!

Hamlet69



Honor the warriors, not the war.
User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 19
Reply 15, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Wonderful job Hmmm....!!! Can you do a 737?  


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineShankly From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2000, 1544 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1454 times:

Imagine the take-off and climb in that 757!!


L1011 - P F M
User currently offlineHL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (14 years 1 month 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1440 times:

have you got 777 engines on it?

User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Thanks everyone for your comments.

I did not notice the red hash marks on the tarmac as repeating. Points to 777Boy for that one. You came close but no cigar, ...er... no bagel.

Yes, B767-400, the engines are close together, but because this is a fantasy plane to begin with, then that wouldn't matter. It proves that the plane could be a gag, but not necessarily that the photo is a gag. It could be a real photo of a gag plane.

SammyK mentioned the angle of the fake engine. I believe the angle of the outboard engine has the same angle as the original engine because it is just a duplication of the original engine viewed from the same angle.

As far as Hamlet's comment about the spoilers, I think you meant slats, right? The flaps on the leading edge of the wing? But I'm not sure that the photo reveals much there. At least to my eye, I don't see the conflict. Maybe your eye is better.

When I posted it, I didn't know that it had a fatal flaw. I was waiting to see if anybody could come up with one.

But what I suppose gives away the photo is not in the plane itself. I believe it to be without a dead giveaway. The fatal flaw was in the editing of the tarmac with respect to the center line for the nose gear as SammyK pointed out. That, as you can see, has been duplicated in the same process that duplicated the inboard engine. It is there in between the inboard and outboard engines. I missed that. There would never be two center lines. Proving that it is the photo that is altered.

For your comparision I have posted the original shot here.

There are two alterations that I made, other than the additional engine, that differentiates the original shot from my trickery. What are they?


Hmmmm...



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineDL_Mech From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 1953 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1375 times:

Man on the ramp and double jetway?


This plane is built to withstand anything... except a bad pilot.
User currently offlineAirbpman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1365 times:

the white van  

now for that, i wanna see a '47 tri-jet!


User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 21, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1357 times:

DLMech, you almost had it. You obviously work down on the tarmac. Nobody else would have noticed the double jetway. Yes, the jetway seems double. But why? Because the white van is gone! I needed background to fill it.

Airbpman, you got the van, that was the harder of the two to catch. But you missed the missing ramp rat that DLmech caught!

Okay, you both did good. There's no rest for the wicked. I'm working on another now.

Remember I'm working with very limited software. So all this has to be done by hand.

Hmmmm...




An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineTEDSKI From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1343 times:

How about putting those P&W or GE engines on a A34O-200/300?

User currently offlineC72 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1342 times:

is there a landing gear (right rear) missing? on that 757

Steve


User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2104 posts, RR: 5
Reply 24, posted (14 years 1 month 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

Here's a 6-engine Air Canada 747. I think the engine job is pretty good and no tarmac mistakes this time. I hope.






I've also made two alterations to the photo above that differentiates it from the original photo below.




This time the deal works like this: E-mail me your findings, do not post them. That way nobody else can get what they missed from you.

The first person to correctly catch the two alterations and e-mail me, will receive a year's supply of Hmmmm-approved banal and smartass comments, quips, and comebacks for use in debate and discussion on Airliners.net. A $49.95 value.

Hmmmm...



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
25 Hmmmm... : Thanks for your comments. C72, it may look like the right gear boggy is missing, but it looks like that too in the original photo. It's hidden behind
26 Airbpman : i e-mailed ya.
27 We're Nuts : I found a mistake in your 747 picture. Pilot did a pretty bad parking job on that baby, right through the terminal!
28 Hmmmm... : We're nutz, what do you mean about the parking job? The position of the 747 is the same relative to its surroundings as in the original untouched phot
29 Turbulence : Hi all. I'm a little late here, but I'd like to add a comment on SammyK's observation and Hmmmmm...'s answer to it. You are both right, folks. Why? Fi
30 Ericmetallica : Great job, those are great
31 Hmmmm... : Well, Airpbman won. He correctly found the two alterations in the faked photo. Nobody else has. Anyone else care to guess? Or can I divulge the inform
32 Post contains images Qantas737 : For the person who wanted a 4-engined 737 i have made one and sent the picture to Hmmmm.... I'm hoping he can put it up on the forum as I have little
33 Post contains images Hmmmm... : Thank you Qantas737, for your submission. You did an excellent job! Unfortunately, it is in BMP format. It takes forever to load. It should be in JPG
34 Post contains images Sammyk : Hey, looks like a little 720! So, Hmmmm, are you going to tell us what the differences were between the two 747s? Sammy
35 Post contains images Delta777-XXX : That is soo cool! These pictures are sooo neat! Somone email the owner and tell him to have a section especially for pictures like this. That Delta 76
36 Post contains images Delta777-XXX : hmmmm... I have emailed you a Delta 777 with four engines if you wanna post it up here! It's not great, but it's neat.
37 Post contains links BadischerGreif : Hi, to convert the bmp: open it with MSPaint and save it as JPG. The most simple method, you get a better quality with Paint Shop Pro or similar graph
38 Post contains images Hmmmm... : Okay here is that Delta 777 created by Delta777-XXX which he asked me to "URL-ize". Also, thanks to Mr. Greif for the URL of the fake planes upload si
39 We're Nuts : Sorry, I haven't been checking this thread. Hmmmm..., I was talking about KLM 747 in the background, but I didn't want to give it away.
40 MEA-707 : The link to the 4 engined 732 is broken ! *SOB* I'm very curious. Can anyone post it again or to my email-adress? Thanx!!
41 Post contains images Qantas737 : Sorry Hmmmm... I'm not real good with this stuff. I just made that picture with Corel Photopaint by cutting and pasting than zooming in by 600% to mat
42 BadischerGreif : Hello, the site I mentioned is not automated, its just an email gateway. So you have to wait until the page is updated. Regards, Badischer Greif
43 Hmmmm... : The link to the 737 is not broken. You will notice there is a blank space in that post. That is where the picture will load when it does. About 5 minu
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL 767 Domestic WiFi Status? posted Wed Sep 2 2009 13:31:19 by Srbmod
IAD Spotters - LAN 767 In IAD posted Sat Aug 29 2009 13:31:10 by Alphaomega
Update On AA 767 Winglets? posted Thu Aug 27 2009 10:11:49 by Flavio340
767 Crew Bunk Rest posted Tue Aug 25 2009 03:25:05 by BAStew
AC 767's To NRT From YYZ posted Thu Aug 20 2009 07:17:16 by SixtySeven
Are These The First 2 767-300ER's To Be Scrapped? posted Tue Aug 18 2009 05:44:08 by 76er
Crippled RAM 767 Repaired After Hard Landing @ JFK posted Sun Aug 16 2009 00:52:07 by GothamSpotter
Damaged Air Maroc 767 At JFK posted Wed Aug 12 2009 09:29:56 by N471WN
MP Selling Remaining 767's posted Wed Jul 29 2009 12:58:19 by CrimsonNL
British Airways To Canada: All 767 Ops (except For YVR) posted Mon Jul 27 2009 07:01:45 by Flyyul