Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FAA Says No To JAT For U.S And Canada Flights.  
User currently offlineWolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5915 times:

The FAA has not granted JAT the right to serve JFK and YYZ and the carrier has cancelled the lease on the polet 767-200 it was planning to operate on the routes.For now JAT will seek a codeshare on these routes.These routes were to begin in may.A little dissapointing to say the least....


Guess what???I dont like you either...
10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCYLW From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 5887 times:

WTF?

How can the FAA say who can or cannot fly into Canada??


User currently offlineWolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5869 times:

It has more to do with JAT dumping the 767 than anything else.


Guess what???I dont like you either...
User currently offlineCayMan From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 905 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5869 times:

Were they only going to have 1 762 to fly both routes? I would have thought they would need 2 anyway?

User currently offlineWolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5827 times:

The carrier was leasing only 1 762 for the flights,3x weekly JFK and 1 or 2x weekly to YYZ.


Guess what???I dont like you either...
User currently offlineStarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5611 times:

Why would they be refused ?


So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5598 times:

Quoting StarGoldLHR (Reply 5):
Why would they be refused ?

Regarding the YYZ flight, it's the responsibility of the Canadian CAA. I don't understand what the FAA has to do with flights into Canada.


User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 24864 posts, RR: 46
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5568 times:

Serbia maintains Category-2 status in the FAA International Aviation Safety Assessments (IASA) Program.
http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs_i...es/oversight/iasa/media/iasaws.xls

As a result the carrier is bared from launching new services to the US.

From what I understand Serbia also has several other bilateral agreements that have expired in regards to immigration and security issues with the US that require renewal prior to resumption of services.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineHS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5556 times:

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 6):
Regarding the YYZ flight, it's the responsibility of the Canadian CAA. I don't understand what the FAA has to do with flights into Canada.

I think there has been a slight misunderstanding. It's likely that as a result of the FAA refusing rights to serve JFK, it is no longer viable to serve YYZ. The FAA has not, I would suggest, prevented JAT from serving YYZ if it wanted to. As someone else said, that would be a matter for the Canadians.


User currently offlineWolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 3 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5459 times:

Its simply the fact that the carrier wont be taking the 767-200,its not viable to lease a jet for flights to a destination your only going to serve once or twice a week.So in reality even though the FAA doesnt govern canadian skies there decision effected Torontos JAT service directly.Although I wonder if Skyservice will operate its YYZ-Belgrade flights this summer.


Guess what???I dont like you either...
User currently offlineJU101 From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 832 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5140 times:

Unfortunate news from the United States, but nonetheless, it was not unanticipated. Leasing one long-haul aircraft for the purpose of one or two weekly flights is certainly not feasible. I am afraid that it is rather late for Jat to find a codeshare partner now. Any takers?

The FAA rejection to resume direct flights should provide incentive for Serbia & Montenegro to renew their outstanding agreements with the States. My only concern is that the US may be slowing down the whole process as a result of foreign policy issues. Moreover, Serbia & Montenegro may want to wait after the Montenegrin referendum to see what the future holds for the state union.

I was told that SkyService will not be flying to Serbia nor Croatia this summer.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Venezuelan Govt Says NO To AA Flights SJU-Porlamar posted Tue Jun 21 2005 15:47:14 by Luisde8cd
Canada Says No To Universal posted Fri Dec 3 2004 14:40:33 by LatinAviation
FAA Says No Room To Grow At Newark posted Sat Jun 26 2004 06:37:04 by STT757
FAA Says LGA To Get New Tower posted Fri Sep 29 2006 14:27:57 by Jumbojet
America West Says NO To Fargo posted Thu Oct 13 2005 04:33:01 by Azstar
Jet2 To Add IBZ And More Flights From LBA posted Wed Sep 15 2004 19:38:01 by Capital146
CO Says No To GNV posted Thu Jan 15 2004 15:00:34 by FlyPNS1
Usxp Says No To NAA posted Mon Nov 24 2003 22:13:43 by LatinAviation
Accc Says NO To Qantas/Air New Zealand posted Tue Sep 9 2003 02:41:07 by AJ
Ryanair Says NO To American Express posted Fri Jun 20 2003 16:39:01 by Britair