FAA Says No To JAT For U.S And Canada Flights. — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

FAA Says No To JAT For U.S And Canada Flights.

Wolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3767 times:

The FAA has not granted JAT the right to serve JFK and YYZ and the carrier has cancelled the lease on the polet 767-200 it was planning to operate on the routes.For now JAT will seek a codeshare on these routes.These routes were to begin in may.A little dissapointing to say the least....

Guess what???I dont like you either...

10 replies: All unread, jump to last

CYLW From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 413 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3739 times:

WTF?

How can the FAA say who can or cannot fly into Canada??

Wolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3721 times:

It has more to do with JAT dumping the 767 than anything else.

Guess what???I dont like you either...

CayMan From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 905 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3721 times:

Were they only going to have 1 762 to fly both routes? I would have thought they would need 2 anyway?

Wolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 3679 times:

The carrier was leasing only 1 762 for the flights,3x weekly JFK and 1 or 2x weekly to YYZ.

Guess what???I dont like you either...

StarGoldLHR From Heard and McDonald Islands, joined Feb 2004, 1529 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3463 times:

Why would they be refused ?

So far in 2008 45 flights and Gold already. JFK, IAD, LGA, SIN, HKG, NRT, AKL, PPT, LAX still to book ! Home Airport LCY

LTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3450 times:

Quoting StarGoldLHR (Reply 5):
Why would they be refused ?

Regarding the YYZ flight, it's the responsibility of the Canadian CAA. I don't understand what the FAA has to do with flights into Canada.

Laxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 22030 posts, RR: 51
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3420 times:

Serbia maintains Category-2 status in the FAA International Aviation Safety Assessments (IASA) Program.
http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs_i...es/oversight/iasa/media/iasaws.xls

As a result the carrier is bared from launching new services to the US.

From what I understand Serbia also has several other bilateral agreements that have expired in regards to immigration and security issues with the US that require renewal prior to resumption of services.

From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California

HS748 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 3408 times:

Quoting LTU932 (Reply 6):
Regarding the YYZ flight, it's the responsibility of the Canadian CAA. I don't understand what the FAA has to do with flights into Canada.

I think there has been a slight misunderstanding. It's likely that as a result of the FAA refusing rights to serve JFK, it is no longer viable to serve YYZ. The FAA has not, I would suggest, prevented JAT from serving YYZ if it wanted to. As someone else said, that would be a matter for the Canadians.

Wolsingerjet From Canada, joined Apr 2006, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 3311 times:

Its simply the fact that the carrier wont be taking the 767-200,its not viable to lease a jet for flights to a destination your only going to serve once or twice a week.So in reality even though the FAA doesnt govern canadian skies there decision effected Torontos JAT service directly.Although I wonder if Skyservice will operate its YYZ-Belgrade flights this summer.

Guess what???I dont like you either...

JU101 From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 832 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2992 times:

Unfortunate news from the United States, but nonetheless, it was not unanticipated. Leasing one long-haul aircraft for the purpose of one or two weekly flights is certainly not feasible. I am afraid that it is rather late for Jat to find a codeshare partner now. Any takers?

The FAA rejection to resume direct flights should provide incentive for Serbia & Montenegro to renew their outstanding agreements with the States. My only concern is that the US may be slowing down the whole process as a result of foreign policy issues. Moreover, Serbia & Montenegro may want to wait after the Montenegrin referendum to see what the future holds for the state union.

I was told that SkyService will not be flying to Serbia nor Croatia this summer.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: