Without looking it up I would hazard a guess that there is some size difference between the Rolls Royce engines and the GE-90s. Probably not much but the RR engines always look slimmer but longer to me. That said, as Cadet57 put it they are as wide as a 737 so they are big ass no matter what.
"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
AA777223 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1116 posts, RR: 7 Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 12085 times:
I know the RR Trent 892 is only 110 inches in diameter as seen on the AA picture above, whereas the GE-90 is 135 inches. In fact the engine nacelle is, I believe, the same on GE90- 76, 94, and 115B. It is in fact the fan that is slightly larger. Because of the composite blades used in the 115b they are able to use a closer fit in the nacelle. The composites do not expand and contract near as much as titanium, or aluminum blades would. the P&W engine is 112 inches. There is therefore a fairly signifaicant difference in the ngines. In fact, I think the 777, 757 and the 747 have the most distinguishable engines differences.
GQfluffy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 11226 times:
There's a picture floating around of a BA 772A with the GE 90 parked next to a BA 737. It was arranged so that the engine was right in front of the 737. The nacelle is bascially the same size as the 737. Swanky...
AA777223 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1116 posts, RR: 7 Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 10564 times:
Thanks for all the posts. I think its really interesting to try and identify each engine.
The GE90 is just huge, and has the titanium leading edge blades, and they are swept if its a 110/115B
The Rolls Royce is smaller (but still huge!), and has a kind of arched sweep to them.
And the Pratts... well the pratts are unremarkable.