Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
UA Gets ORD-CUN Route Authority  
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33083 posts, RR: 71
Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4222 times:

United Airlines has beaten out USA 3000 and Frontier Airlines and has been awarded route authority to begin Chicago-Cancun serivce:

http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.c...m?documentid=396239&docketid=23496


a.
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineEddieDude From Mexico, joined Nov 2003, 7599 posts, RR: 42
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4202 times:

I assume that AA already flies this route and per the bilateral, up to three U.S. carriers can serve this city pair. Is there a pending application for the third slot or is there someone else already flying CHI-CUN Mark?


Next flights: MEX-GRU (AM 77E), GRU-GIG (JJ A320), SDU-CGH (G3 73H), GRU-MEX (JJ A332).
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33083 posts, RR: 71
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4200 times:

Quoting EddieDude (Reply 1):
I assume that AA already flies this route and per the bilateral, up to three U.S. carriers can serve this city pair. Is there a pending application for the third slot or is there someone else already flying CHI-CUN Mark?

ATA flies Midway-Cancun.



a.
User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4187 times:

So, the DOT has finally decided on one of the intensively competed for US-CUN routes. How many months have those applications been pending now, 4?

[Edited 2006-04-26 17:19:09]

User currently offlineTjwgrr From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 2474 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4175 times:

UA used to operate ORD-CUN with DC-8-71's if my memory serves me correctly.....


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank C. Duarte Jr.




Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
User currently offlineChiGB1973 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 1616 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4175 times:

Great news for UA!

M


User currently offlineUAL777UK From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 3356 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4119 times:

Wll done UA, hopefully it should do well, Mexico seems a very popular choice these days.

User currently offlineLaxintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25841 posts, RR: 50
Reply 7, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4008 times:

Good to hear the DOT finally start acting on some of the contested Mexico routes.

I cant wait to see whom gets the JFK-CUN, and the hotly contested LAX-SJD route.

[Edited 2006-04-26 19:20:29]


From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3929 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 7):
I cant wait to see whom gets the JFK-CUN,

Or if in the unlikely chance USA 3000 get the authority, EWR-CUN. Any word on when a decision will be made?



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineJuventus From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 2835 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3925 times:

I was hoping for UAL to get ORD-CUN as well as Jetblue to get JFK-CUN. Frontier has plenty of CUN presence, good decision.

User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7557 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3885 times:

Surprised they are just now flying this, I take it United is somewhat behind the pack in CUN?


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineORDPIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 140 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3865 times:

Great News for UA, and they are going to be using mainline for some flights!


Concorde 146 727 737 73G 742 744 752 753 762 763 772 773 300 319 320 321 343 346 CRJ ERJ ATR ATP CL604 LJ45 LJ60 BD700
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3110 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3857 times:

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 10):
Surprised they are just now flying this, I take it United is somewhat behind the pack in CUN?

And in Mexico and the Caribbean in general.


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26626 posts, RR: 75
Reply 13, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3837 times:

Quoting Laxintl (Reply 7):
hotly contested LAX-SJD route.

That should go to UA too, if committment to a market means anything to the DOT

Quoting Burnsie28 (Reply 10):
Surprised they are just now flying this, I take it United is somewhat behind the pack in CUN?

Under the 2 carrier rule, AA and TZ had the rights. UA just slotted in as the third.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9671 posts, RR: 52
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3794 times:

It is good to see that UA got the route, but unfortunately they will probably only serve CUN on Saturdays. But I personally doubt that any new airline was going to off nonstop daily service between ORD and CUN. But maybe UA will.


If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineMariner From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 25458 posts, RR: 86
Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3790 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting N1120A (Reply 13):
That should go to UA too, if committment to a market means anything to the DOT

Anything is possible, but given the DOT's notorious even-handedness, I would raise an eyebrow if UA got both authorities.

And I would think Delta would yell.

mariner



aeternum nauta
User currently offlineUAL#1fan From United States of America, joined May 2001, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3728 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 12):
And in Mexico and the Caribbean in general.

Agreed. Asian expansion is highest on United's priorities list right now. Europe and Latin America lag behind in focus for UA. Because of this, other carriers have seized the lead in the Mexican/Caribbean/South American market, like AA and CO, although to be fair United does not have a hub that would be a good gateway to these location (unlike AA at DFW and CO at IAH).



United Air Lines -Mainliners Coast to Coast
User currently offlineB777Fanatic1 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 29 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3719 times:

Well, if it were'nt for CUN, PVR, SJD I don't know were we would be as far as legacies are concerned. "Viva Mexico" i guess.

User currently offlineAviatorTJ From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 1838 posts, RR: 7
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 3672 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Carlos Aleman - SJU Aviation Photography



I was disappointed that I could not take ORD-CUN over DEN-CUN last March. I look forward to picking this up in the near future. Way to go UA/TED!


User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3110 posts, RR: 2
Reply 19, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 3617 times:

Quoting UAL#1fan (Reply 16):
Agreed. Asian expansion is highest on United's priorities list right now. Europe and Latin America lag behind in focus for UA. Because of this, other carriers have seized the lead in the Mexican/Caribbean/South American market, like AA and CO, although to be fair United does not have a hub that would be a good gateway to these location (unlike AA at DFW and CO at IAH).

That's a good point, but what is their excuse at LAX? Not trying to knock UA as I've had lots of good experiences with them, but they are the only legacy to have a true hub at LAX, but they didn't really start Mexico flights until the past few years. In the meantime, AS has been able to build up the largest Mexico operation out of LAX - why wasn't UA in on some of that action until now? Same with SFO - why did they just recently start flights from SFO to Mexico.

That said, they have finally added some Saturday flights from IAD and ORD to the Caribbean, so they're at least seeing some opportunity. But I wonder why they couldn't add some RJ frequencies to smaller cities and put the 319/320 on more Caribbean and Mexico routes (especially from IAD and LAX)?


User currently offlineORDPIA From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 140 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 3523 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 14):
It is good to see that UA got the route, but unfortunately they will probably only serve CUN on Saturdays. But I personally doubt that any new airline was going to off nonstop daily service between ORD and CUN. But maybe UA will.

Looks like daily Ted service and Sat and Sun mainline, and even twice daily Ted during high season. http://dms.dot.gov/search/document.c...m?documentid=396239&docketid=23496
open the PDF and go to page 2, it has the whole proposal



Concorde 146 727 737 73G 742 744 752 753 762 763 772 773 300 319 320 321 343 346 CRJ ERJ ATR ATP CL604 LJ45 LJ60 BD700
User currently offlineUAL#1fan From United States of America, joined May 2001, 88 posts, RR: 0
Reply 21, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3357 times:

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 19):
they have finally added some Saturday flights from IAD and ORD to the Caribbean, so they're at least seeing some opportunity.

In the last three years, we have seen quite a bit of expansion by United in the Caribbean, so I imagine it will increase. They have started service to SXM, Montego Bay, three or four new Mexican destinations, Aruba, Bermuda, Punta Cana, and St. Lucia. I hope this expansion will continue.

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 19):
That's a good point, but what is their excuse at LAX? Not trying to knock UA as I've had lots of good experiences with them, but they are the only legacy to have a true hub at LAX, but they didn't really start Mexico flights until the past few years.

Yeah, I don't know what's going on in Chicago headquarters, but UA should definitely try to capitalize on their hub at LAX. Los Angeles probably has one of the top five largest Latin American communities in the U.S., so there is a huge market for Mexican/Latin American flights. I'm sure United realizes this, but they should try to take advantage of their LAX hub to seize this demand and market.



United Air Lines -Mainliners Coast to Coast
User currently offlineBicoastal From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3345 times:

Until United is in a position to order and receive new aircraft, any major expansion will result only from optimizing its schedule. Many of the new Caribbean routes were Winter seasonal flights. They'll end soon and the aircraft will be shifted to locations to optimize Summer flying. There are many ideal routes from many of its hubs just waiting for United to get new aircraft.

User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26626 posts, RR: 75
Reply 23, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 3320 times:

Quoting Mariner (Reply 15):
Anything is possible, but given the DOT's notorious even-handedness, I would raise an eyebrow if UA got both authorities.

And I would think Delta would yell.

Who cares what Delta would say. What commitment have they shown to the LAX market? They don't even pay for their terminal at this point. If United doesn't get it (which they should), then Frontier should. Then again, there is currently only one US airline on the route (Alaska), since ATA gave up their authority, so there will be two to go out.

Quoting UAL#1fan (Reply 21):
Los Angeles probably has one of the top five largest Latin American communities in the U.S

One of the top 5? Try the largest



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Eastern's MSY-CUN Route Authority posted Thu Jan 20 2005 07:43:41 by MSYtristar
Jetblue Gets JFK-CUN Authority posted Thu Jun 22 2006 03:05:01 by B6FA4ever
UA To File For ORD-CUN/PVR, LAX-PVR/SJD posted Wed Oct 12 2005 23:48:18 by MAH4546
OS In Talks With UA About Possible ORD-VIE Route posted Fri Jun 17 2005 15:08:29 by VORFMD
UA Gets Clearance For DEN-CUN/PVR posted Mon Aug 30 2004 18:59:27 by UA744Flagship
Ua Plans ORD-New Dehli Route posted Thu Apr 1 1999 23:11:59 by Jz
Route Authority (US Airlines) posted Sun Oct 1 2006 23:33:48 by Lincoln
AA DFW-ORD Vs. UA DEN-ORD posted Mon Sep 18 2006 22:28:44 by Theweave33
UA Axes ORD-EZE...again posted Sun Sep 3 2006 22:09:08 by MAH4546
DOT Approvals - AS Gets SFO-CUN; F9 Gets SAN-CUN posted Tue Jul 11 2006 05:31:02 by FATFlyer