Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FAA Environmental Approval For WN At DEN?  
User currently offlineFATFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 4 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 3211 times:

The news article in the other thread about WN growing at DEN had a paragraph about FAA approval.
Dallas-based Southwest last year received federal approval to start service at DIA and was told it would have to go through the process again if it planned to add more than 40 flights.

Airlines that want to start service or significantly increase flights at a given airport must meet certain environmental regulations. The FAA has issued a recommendation approving Southwest's latest proposal, saying the new flights conform with the regulations. The agency is now accepting public comment on the issue.

It appears that the environmental factors have to be examined. That includes noise.

Also in areas with air quality problems there seems to be a requirement to get approval for major actions that could add large amounts of emissions.

So the way I understand it WN needs a General Conformity Determination that the large increase in flights is accounted for in the area's air quality planning and will not significantly impact the environment.

I still don't know what the triggers are in terms of number of flights, etc. Also how long has this policy been in place in terms of flight increases?

Anyone more knowledgable care to fill in about this requirement.

From the docket:

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineDNL65 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 3141 times:

The applicable guidance is included in FAAOrder 1050.1E Paragraph 401L  Smile

User currently offlineFATFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3093 times:

Quoting DNL65 (Reply 1):
The applicable guidance is included in FAAOrder 1050.1E Paragraph 401L

Thanks, now I'm just trying to figure out why 1050 was published in 2004 but I never caught this kind of approval for any airline before. Also 1050 I thought mainly applied to airport construction projects.

So I'm trying to identify what the trigger was for WN, what is different here vs. say PHL or RSW. I don't see where this happened in some of the other new cities.

I'm familiar with California's CEQA which is basically triggered by almost anything. But this FAA environmental involvement in relation to airline schedules and ops is new to me.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
No Room For WN At DFW posted Sat May 6 2006 06:44:36 by DALNeighbor
WN And DEN: Precedent For MSP? posted Fri Sep 1 2006 06:28:53 by AirRyan
Strong DEN Start For WN posted Mon Jan 16 2006 21:54:43 by Dbba
What To Do At DEN For 2 Hours... posted Thu Aug 4 2005 03:21:49 by NWADC9
Next-gen Narrowbody Opportunity For Airbus At WN? posted Thu Feb 3 2005 16:20:53 by N328KF
Allegiant Hiring F/As For New Bases At DEN And RNO posted Wed Feb 12 2003 17:00:40 by FATFlyer
Would It Make Sense For WN To Move To A At Cle? posted Sat Feb 9 2002 21:53:41 by N766UA
New Requirements For Foreigners At US Airports? posted Fri Dec 1 2006 19:22:07 by Goldorak
WN At PHL posted Sat Nov 25 2006 05:57:43 by Tony Lu
Upsetting Incident For Me At Prague And IST posted Sat Nov 4 2006 14:35:41 by Pilotaydin