Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
India Signs Open Skies Agreement With New Zealand  
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4840 posts, RR: 9
Posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4961 times:

http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11964-5721365,00.html

India is to sign today an open skies agreement which will allow NZ to fly daily to India...
NZ has been looking at India for some time now and has been mentioning it as one of the first destinations for the new 787 as a direct service.


56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
26 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBehramjee From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 4802 posts, RR: 44
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 4932 times:

how many Indians are there in NZ on the whole to warrant a daily B 787 service?

I would have ANZ tap into a niche market and fly AKL-SYD-DEL with the B 788 as QF fly SYD-BOM leaving SYD-DEL to ANZ to tap into. But would the Australia-India bilateral permit ANZ to fly with 5th freedom traffic via SYD to India is the key question.


User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5714 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4906 times:

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 1):
I would have ANZ tap into a niche market and fly AKL-SYD-DEL with the B 788 as QF fly SYD-BOM leaving SYD-DEL to ANZ to tap into. But would the Australia-India bilateral permit ANZ to fly with 5th freedom traffic via SYD to India is the key question.

The Australia-India bilateral is irrevelant to your proposed service. The real questions are: 1) Does the NZ-Australia agreement permit Air NZ to fly from Australia to India with 5th freedom rights? The answer is "yes". 2) Does the NZ-India agreement allow Air NZ to stop in and pick up pax from Australia on the way to India? That I don't know. I supect it does, but until we see the text of the new agreement it's very hard to say.

Bi lateral agreements very, very rarely, if ever, mention airlines from 3rd countries in any way. That would make them tri lateral treaties, which AFAIK are not to be found in aviation. Certianly the Australia-India bilateral does not mention services by airlines other than Australia and Indian airlines.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4840 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4904 times:

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 1):
how many Indians are there in NZ on the whole to warrant a daily B 787 service?

I would have ANZ tap into a niche market and fly AKL-SYD-DEL with the B 788 as QF fly SYD-BOM leaving SYD-DEL to ANZ to tap into. But would the Australia-India bilateral permit ANZ to fly with 5th freedom traffic via SYD to India is the key question.

I think there are about 60,000 Indians living in New Zealand, but many families come down from India to visit their relatives and many New Zealand Indians go home to visit relatives also. It would be mostly the family/leisure market rather than the business market. As for daily flights... NZ would start off with 3x weekly, if needed increase to 5x or 6x weekly. NZ doesn't like racing into daily flights however (partly because NZ has a small fleet and perhaps needs time for mx due to the heavy utilization of aircraft, so a day off is useful.)
As for Australia, well New Zealand has an open skies agreement with Australia, I'm not too sure if India would have an issue with NZ flying via Australia first.
I heard that QF is looking at making India a target for JQ with its new fleet of 787's.



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineJoFMO From Germany, joined Jul 2004, 2211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4851 times:

NZ could also fly via SIN and let SQ place its code on the SIN-India section. That would guarantee them a healthy load all the way to India. But I doubt if SQ is willing to give NZ a slice of the SIN-India market.

User currently offlineGemuser From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 5714 posts, RR: 6
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4834 times:

Quoting JoFMO (Reply 4):
NZ could also fly via SIN and let SQ place its code on the SIN-India section. That would guarantee them a healthy load all the way to India. But I doubt if SQ is willing to give NZ a slice of the SIN-India market.

I am pretty sure NZ has full 5th freedom rights beyond SIN.

Gemuser



DC23468910;B72172273373G73873H74374475275376377L77W;A319 320321332333343;BAe146;C402;DHC6;F27;L188;MD80MD85
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4840 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 4811 times:

Quoting JoFMO (Reply 4):
NZ could also fly via SIN and let SQ place its code on the SIN-India section. That would guarantee them a healthy load all the way to India. But I doubt if SQ is willing to give NZ a slice of the SIN-India market.

NZ could do that... but as you said SQ isn't willing to let that happen... codeshare or not.



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineZK-NBT From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 5351 posts, RR: 11
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4704 times:

Maybe via KUL then?

Anyway what hapened to AI looking at AKL via SYD? I no they havn't restarted SYD yet but they should be soon.


User currently offlineAKLDELNonstop From New Zealand, joined Apr 2006, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4678 times:

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 1):



how many Indians are there in NZ on the whole to warrant a daily B 787 service?

There are 80000 Indians in India officially, which is about 2.5% of the total NZ population. However, Im not sure if this figure includes PIOs (Persons of Indian Origin). Also there are a lot off Fijians of Indian origin in NZ.

At the moment business ties between NZ and India appear to be very less so the traffic will be limited to tourist and visiting families. So keeping that in mind I guess a 3x AKL-DEL flt would makes sense or AKL-SYD-DEL daily or 5x a week. But AKL-DEL daily may not make a lot of sense at the moment. Unless NZ plan to fly AKL-DEL-LHR, if they are permitted to do so. That would make sense. On the other hand Indian carriers flying DEL-SYD-AKL could time their flights with those from Europe. That would allow passengers from Europe to fly to the pacific through India.

Cheers


User currently offlineAtmx2000 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4576 posts, RR: 37
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 4676 times:

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 8):
There are 80000 Indians in India officially

I think your count of Indians in India is off by something like 1 billion. 

[Edited 2006-05-02 09:03:06]


ConcordeBoy is a twin supremacist!! He supports quadicide!!
User currently offlineNZ767 From New Zealand, joined Nov 2001, 1620 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4642 times:

Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 9):
I think your count of Indians in India is off by something like 1 billion.

LMAO Big grin

Quoting Behramjee (Reply 1):
how many Indians are there in NZ on the whole to warrant a daily B 787 service?

Most Indians here in NZ are of Fijian origin, however, this is only part of the equation. The other question is, what would be the potential for cargo uplift between the two countries? Smile


User currently offlineAKLDELNonstop From New Zealand, joined Apr 2006, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4615 times:

Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 9):
I think your count of Indians in India is off by something like 1 billion.

Sorry mate


User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6436 posts, RR: 38
Reply 12, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4597 times:

Quoting NZ767 (Reply 10):
The other question is, what would be the potential for cargo uplift between the two countries?

One question I would ask as well. I would think that due to cargo, PEK would have more of a benefit to NZ at this point, and probably in the future too and if that happens, NZ will have pretty much the whole of China covered (ie. HKG in the south, PVG in the east and then PEK in the north), possibly bringing costs of air freight between NZ and China down dramatically.

Direct services 3x weekly? That would be my guess for the time being, but to really capture the market they must travel to both north and south India.


How about AKL-NAN-DELBig grin



It's all about the destination AND the journey.
User currently offlineAntskip From Australia, joined Jan 2006, 936 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 4597 times:

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 11):
Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 9):
I think your count of Indians in India is off by something like 1 billion.

Sorry mate

a typo surely?: should have been "Indians in New Zealand"


User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4560 times:

Quoting Zkpilot (Thread starter):
India is to sign today an open skies agreement

Sorry to be a penant - but this is NOT an open skies agreement. While offering more flight options they are capped at 7x a week and do not provide additional beyond fifths. From what I read elsewhere (sorry can't find it anymore) New Zealand airlines also can code share on Indian airlines metal (and v.v.) via Intermediate points - but NZ doesn't have the right to code share on other airlines metal (SQ for example)

This treaty still contains a number of (unnecessary) economic restrictions - it fails the test of being open skies.


User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4840 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 4560 times:

Quoting Atmx2000 (Reply 9):
Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 8):
There are 80000 Indians in India officially

I think your count of Indians in India is off by something like 1 billion.

lol

as for the total indians in New Zealand...that would be all indian descent... incl fijian indians... (most indians in nzl are actually fijian indians not indian indians, but maintain strong links with india.)



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 3259 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4539 times:

Quoting ANother (Reply 14):
This treaty still contains a number of (unnecessary) economic restrictions - it fails the test of being open skies.

Does anyone know why the treaty was not kept as a full open-skies? Could the Indian side be feeling threatened of NZ using India as a hub and picking up a lot of 5th freedem traffic? Or did neither side want a full open skies agreement?



Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
User currently offlineFly2CHC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4536 times:

My vote would be for a daily AKL-KUL-BOM service!

User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 18, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 4515 times:

Quoting Nimish (Reply 16):

Does anyone know why the treaty was not kept as a full open-skies? Could the Indian side be feeling threatened of NZ using India as a hub and picking up a lot of 5th freedem traffic? Or did neither side want a full open skies agreement?

My guess is that the NZ gummint would have agreed to Open Skies. They have been quite enlightened in negotiating aviation treaties. I suspect the bureaucratic mindset was on the Indian side.


User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 3259 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 4457 times:

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 18):
I suspect the bureaucratic mindset was on the Indian side.

To be fair to the Indian side - they've been quite reasonable of late - including signing full open-skies with the US, and refusing to liberalize the treaty with HKG, until HKG opened up the skies for all Indian carriers.

It's kind of puzzling in this case. My guess is that neither side sees the value of a full open skies, hence decided not to go that way.



Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4440 times:

Quoting Nimish (Reply 19):

To be fair to the Indian side - they've been quite reasonable of late - including signing full open-skies with the US, and refusing to liberalize the treaty with HKG, until HKG opened up the skies for all Indian carriers.

To be fair, the Indian gummint has gotten better, but is still more protectionist than the NZ gummint, IMO.


User currently offlineKoruman From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4432 times:

Actually, you've all missed the point of future Air NZ flights to India. It's all about freight and IT. And the freight will be flying straight on to NAN.

The idea is to fly the same aircraft NAN (Fiji) - AKL - BOM, with the flight number changing for the different sectors.

Yes, most of NZ's "Indians" are actually Fijian. But while their personal links to India may be remote, the real market here is freight from India to Fiji, where there are 400,000 ethnic Indians (and a fair number of Melanesians) who are hanging out for the opportunity to buy more Indian products.

The passenger side of the equation would actually be about:

1) IT / industry types based in Bangalore at their companies' Asia-Pacific HQ travelling in Business Premier to clients in NZ.

2) Middle-class Indians flying Economy Class to holiday in NZ (not vice versa).

Just as Sao Paulo has eclipsed Rio as the location for most multi-nationals' South American HQ, we are just seeing the emergence of Bangalore and Mumbai as Asia-Pacific HQ. They have large, highly-educated, cheap and non-unionised workforces, and I think that Air NZ knows that the high yield market will be inward passengers from India, not outward ones from NZ.


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 4423 times:

I would think that the over 100 weekly flights offered by SQ, MH, TG, CX and QF from India could adequately serve the NZ market for awhile to come.

User currently offlineAKLDELNonstop From New Zealand, joined Apr 2006, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 4261 times:

Well the thing is that many Fijian Indians in AKL have been in Fiji for around three or four generations and most of them have never been to India at all, so counting them as traffic would be unreasonable.

Furthermore, NZ herald a couple of months back reported the number of Indians in NZ to be around 80000. I would assume this to be Indians living here on an Indian passport and not NZ citizens of Indian origin or Fijian Indians. Im sure the classification was based on nationality and not ethnicity. But I would like to be corrected if Im wrong.

Quoting Jaysit (Reply 22):
I would think that the over 100 weekly flights offered by SQ, MH, TG, CX and QF from India could adequately serve the NZ market for awhile to come.

Well while the number of flights are fairly large, some of them like TG have very odd connections with a long layover at their hubs, in this case BKK. Infact some ppl even fly NZ-India on EK via Dubai., feels odd to fly over India just to back track again. So nonstop or one stop flights on the same a/c would be convenient.

Cheers


User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3333 posts, RR: 20
Reply 24, posted (8 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

Quoting AKLDELNonstop (Reply 23):
Well while the number of flights are fairly large, some of them like TG have very odd connections with a long layover at their hubs, in this case BKK. Infact some ppl even fly NZ-India on EK via Dubai., feels odd to fly over India just to back track again. So nonstop or one stop flights on the same a/c would be convenient.

I'm not of Indian origin, but have friends that are, and they tell me the BKK/KUL/SIN stop/layover isnt such a bad thing, because it's a good time to do some shopping for presents for family and friends. Apparently it's a pretty big deal not to visit/go back home empty handed.

can any of our Indian friends confirm?


25 Gamps : How about taking passengers to West Coast USA from India via NZ? This may be a small number but Qantas at San Francisco seem to be picking up few Indi
26 AKLDELNonstop : That is true about the gifts that is. It is usually customary to take some sort of gifts for friends and relatives. Yes in that way the stopover is g
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Open Skies Agreement With The US posted Sat Aug 16 2003 01:30:54 by AMS
India Considering Open Sky Arrangement With EU posted Fri Jun 9 2006 07:15:59 by Himmat01
Canada, Britain Sign Open Skies Agreement posted Sat Apr 22 2006 01:29:51 by Rattibone
Open Skies Agreement posted Thu Feb 9 2006 20:02:08 by FlyingHooker
EU/US Open Skies Speech In New York By BA Chairman posted Thu Jan 19 2006 21:03:09 by Concorde001
US UK Open Skies Agreement posted Sat Sep 17 2005 09:45:42 by Coa747
Ethiopia Is Latest Open Skies Country With USA posted Wed May 18 2005 04:23:55 by ETStar
USA-India Sign Open Skies Pact posted Sat Jan 15 2005 09:30:45 by Behramjee
Imagine A Worldwide Open Skies Agreement posted Sun Feb 22 2004 07:37:53 by Graham697
US Seeks Open Skies Deal With Canada posted Sun Jan 25 2004 21:47:36 by CanadaEH