Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing "Dreams": Clean Engines, Wings That Fold  
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 4103 times:

When Boeing names an airplane design after a Muppet, it must be pretty different.

Two small teams at the company are re-imagining the airplane in futuristic configurations that sprout wings, tails and engines in unexpected shapes and places.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...y/2002973147_boeingconcepts05.html

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4312 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 3946 times:

Leelaw: First, I suggested deletion of my post. You beat me to the article and I didn't realize you had posted the same one.

This is really an interesting article from Seattle. I like the fact that the UDF is still alive and being considered.

Also, I wonder which of these planes or components will make it into the replacement iteration of the 737?



I'm not a racist...I hate Biden, too.
User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3678 times:

Very interesting article and thanks (to both!) for posting it. I just want to add one more thing. The article states:

Since April, Boeing's Phantom Works research unit, in collaboration with NASA and the U.S. Air Force, has been doing wind-tunnel tests on a small-scale, 21-foot-wingspan prototype of a Flying Wing or Blended Wing Body aircraft concept. Flight testing of the prototype is planned for later this year.

If anyone is interested, here's the related Boeing news release (with picture...).

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060504b_nr.html

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30432 posts, RR: 84
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3673 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Nice to see the 7J7 ("Fozzie") and Sonic Cruiser ("Kermit Cruiser") have not been forgotten.  Smile

User currently offlineSNATH From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3238 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 3631 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 3):
Nice to see the 7J7 ("Fozzie") and Sonic Cruiser ("Kermit Cruiser") have not been forgotten.

 bigthumbsup 

My favorite is actually the honeydew! It looks like the space shuttle... Now, that would be a cool plane to fly on!

Tony



Nikon: we don't want more pixels, we want better pixels.
User currently offlineCaribb From Canada, joined Nov 1999, 1636 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3274 times:

Quoting SNATH (Reply 2):
Very interesting article and thanks (to both!) for posting it. I just want to add one more thing. The article states:

Since April, Boeing's Phantom Works research unit, in collaboration with NASA and the U.S. Air Force, has been doing wind-tunnel tests on a small-scale, 21-foot-wingspan prototype of a Flying Wing or Blended Wing Body aircraft concept. Flight testing of the prototype is planned for later this year.

If anyone is interested, here's the related Boeing news release (with picture...).

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/....html

The Discovery Channel (Canada) did an interview with the engineer in charge of this wind tunnel test of the BWB. His said the emphasis ahead was to get a military and perhaps freight version first. I got the impression that an commercial use would be way down the road. This is only a prototype that will lead eventually to a larger commercially viable aircraft years from now. Interesting stuff though.


User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12791 posts, RR: 100
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 3112 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I'm intregued that Boeing is designing for a prop-fan. However, these are very far out designs. Sounds like their technology group... Hmmm... the sort of stuff I used to do! (in the engine world).

Quoting SNATH (Reply 2):
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2006/q2/060504b_nr.html



Quote:
"One big difference between this airplane and the traditional tube and wing aircraft is that -- instead of a conventional tail -- the blended wing body relies solely on multiple control surfaces on the wing for stability and control,"

A la Northrop's flying wings (derived from the Horton flying wings, of course).

Good luck getting the military to fund this now. Between trying to keep alive the C-17, the C-130J, and the Army *screaming* for the C-27 Spartan... I just am hearing zero interest from the military for a C-5 replacement. The Air Force just isn't going to get the money... I'd love to see a BWB... but its a while away.

I'm not likeing "Beaker" with its low cruise speed...  yuck  Go to "Fozzie" with the prop-fan's greater efficiency for climb or fly at jet speed with flexible range...

The Kermit Cruiser is making too many runway compromises for me to take it too seriously. "High Manuverability" means *very unstable* just incase you missed the double speak. A great idea for a fighter or B-1 replacement... The market isn't ready for a 9G cruiser!  rotfl 

That said, take the "Kermit Cruiser" and put a more forward swept wing with lift required by the canards in cruise and you have a very fuel efficient albeit not very manuverable concept... (In other words, perfect!) In fact, there are some well known "wing tricks" that could be done with the Kermit Cruiser... tricks generally well known from prior Grumman designs (sorry, I'm forgetting their forward swept prototype's X number), that I believe we're looking at an out of date concept that has already been significantly refined and altered already.

But the honeydew seems like the way to get the BWB into service (partially). It appears to have a short wingspan for the body size... So I'm wondering if its a good 773 replacement?  scratchchin 

So my final call is the "Kermit cruiser" could be well sized for the 737RS if it gets a radically different wing configuration.

The Honeydew seems like a well thought out idea that could replace the 773. Could it be made *just* fat enough at the front to be two isles at the nose with a single isle from the mid-wing on back?  scratchchin  If so... a shrunk version could also be a 737RS contender!  scratchchin 

Yes, I think the honeydew has much merit at multiple sizes  scratchchin  However, I'm wondering if it might buy down risk to do the honeydew with a V-tail?  scratchchin 

Lightsaber



Societies that achieve a critical mass of ideas achieve self sustaining growth; others stagnate.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Baseler: Boeing In "Serious" 787-10 Talks posted Thu Sep 14 2006 07:09:26 by Leelaw
FAX - "Boeing Operator"? Since When? posted Sun Aug 20 2006 18:36:58 by Flying-Tiger
Boeing's "Muppet" Future Airplane Concepts posted Wed Jun 7 2006 06:20:15 by RayChuang
"Boeing" Font posted Mon May 1 2006 16:37:34 by Tan Flyr
MD11 And Boeing: "An Unreported Blunder" posted Wed Jun 22 2005 15:06:27 by BoeingBus
Who Is Boeing's "Mystery Customer"? posted Thu Apr 7 2005 00:09:13 by DL021
Boeing "house Colours" In Service posted Thu Mar 3 2005 22:46:52 by Yyz717
"Airbus Spreads It's Wings" posted Mon Feb 14 2005 15:15:23 by FLVILLA
Boeing.."You'll See It Flying Phoenix To Shanghai" posted Sun Jan 30 2005 02:00:08 by Jacobin777
New "Airport" Episodes On Disc-Wings? posted Sat Dec 18 2004 10:24:53 by Deltaffindfw
Boeing "Classics" Orders/deliveries? posted Thu Aug 2 2007 05:15:15 by Falstaff
Alaska's "Proudly All Boeing" Title posted Thu May 3 2007 19:24:53 by Jimyvr
"An Airline Business Model That Works" posted Wed Feb 21 2007 21:53:00 by N844AA
Boeing's "Muppet" Future Airplane Concepts posted Wed Jun 7 2006 06:20:15 by RayChuang
Boeing - "Commercially Sensitive" Domain Name? posted Sat May 6 2006 18:45:05 by RobK
"Boeing" Font posted Mon May 1 2006 16:37:34 by Tan Flyr
MD11 And Boeing: "An Unreported Blunder" posted Wed Jun 22 2005 15:06:27 by BoeingBus
Who Is Boeing's "Mystery Customer"? posted Thu Apr 7 2005 00:09:13 by DL021