ContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1593 times:
United Business is actually quite good, although it offers far less in amenities and prestige than AA's,
Business Elite, or BusinessFirst, mainly because it
is a traditional business class service and not one
that is a mix of both levels.
I have flown Conoisseur Class and the newer
product, now known as United Business. It is
good and I'd stay with the 767-200. The First
Class experience on the A320 will have less
legroom and perhaps less amenities.
ILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3142 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1587 times:
I flew UA Business from SFO-IAD a few years ago, and the service was great! I had lots of legroom, and the food is great. It was a morning flight, and I had the fruit plate, with Yogurt, and a bowl of cereal. I can not forget the muffin. Mmm, now thats one of the best breakfasts that I've had on any flight! If you are flying on a 767, 4 of the 6 seats per row are asiles, so you will never get stuck in a middle!
Surf From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 1579 times:
Business Class on a three class aircraft will be the same as First Class on a two class aircraft. Stick with Business on the 767-200. I've flown both First and Business on United's three class 767's from JFK-LAX/SFO and they are both fine though First is of course much better than Business (on a *three* class).