Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Prescreening For Int. Flights Outside USA  
User currently offlineHjulicher From Liechtenstein, joined Feb 2005, 870 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks ago) and read 4257 times:

One of the biggest drawbacks of connecting from an international flight onto a domestic flight in the US is the fact that at the first point of entry into the United States, you must go through passport control, pick-up your bags then go through customs, and then recheck your bags for your next flight. In Europe (as I've only been to europe and don't know about other places except for Russia where everything is even worse than US) there is no need to do this, and connections are much more seemless. Many experienced travellers probably prefer connecting in Europe (if possible) in order to bypass this problem so that when flying to the US, their first point of entry is their final destination. I.E. (via Europe) SVO-AMS-DTW, not (via US) SVO-JFK-DTW.

I was just reading about Delta and their hub expansion at JFK, and I was wondering... could delta prescreen passengers in (let's say CDG) so that when in JFK they don't have to go through passport control and customs?

I read somewhere that int. flights from Ireland to the US are prescreened in Ireland so that there is no need for immigration facilities when arriving in the US from Ireland (Is this true?). If this is the case, is it possible to open prescreening areas for US airlines in European cities so that connecting within the US is easier and therefore competitive with European airlines who HUB in europe? (If this is not clear, basically I mean to be prescreened for entry into the United States in let's say AMS so that upon arrival in DTW, you can go directly to your next gate and not have to shlep bags or anything and go through passport and customs). Of course this wouldn't be provided at every airport, but as is NW's case, if they did so in AMS, then many passengers would connect better.

I don't know how this would work out logistically, but does anybody agree that this would make connecting in the US better? Has anybody else hypothetically thought of how to bypass the whole connecting process in the US, and how to improve on it? Any thoughts appreciated.


LH 442
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRDUDDJI From Lesotho, joined Jun 2004, 1457 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 4191 times:

It's been discussed before, but the main reason is because U.S. airports are not really designed for ITI (International-to-International) traffic. When you arrive at say JFK, there is no way for you to remain in a sterile corridor until your next flight without clearing customs. The U.S. does not have International Lounges like some European airports (but not all of them). There is nothing to stop you from simply walking out of the airport from the boarding area of your JFK-XXX flight and entering the U.S.

Another reason has more to do with facilities at your next airport...if you are connecting to say PWM out of JFK, it would not be practical for a smaller airport like PWM to have a customs facility open at all times for a slow trickle of pax connecting from SVO or wherever. Plus you could arrive at say PWM and not be allowed entry into the U.S., now there is a major problem. To my knowledge there are no direct PWM-SVO flights, so deporting you becomes much more complicated than just looking for the next SU flight to SVO, especaially since SU doesn't fly to PWM, and it would be their responsibility to deport you.

Pre-cleared flights are a different issue. You go through U.S. customs before leaving your origin country. This is done on nearly all U.S. flights out of Canada and for a few Caribbean destinations.



Sometimes we don't realize the good times when we're in them
User currently offlineBDL2DCA From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4133 times:

Quoting RDUDDJI (Reply 1):
Pre-cleared flights are a different issue. You go through U.S. customs before leaving your origin country. This is done on nearly all U.S. flights out of Canada and for a few Caribbean destinations.

There are actually two different kinds of preclearance. Flights from most airports in Canada preclear both customs and immigration. Essentially, you are on US "soil" before you get on the plane, so when it arrives in the US, the flight is treated as domestic.

Flights from Ireland clear only Immigration in Ireland. This is a vestige of the days when there were so many illegal immigrants to the US that it became cheaper to stop them in Ireland before they got on the plane than it was to try and send them back when they got to JFK or BOS. Even though that is no longer the issue that it once was, once a government agency is established, it has a tendency to stick around.

You still must clear customs at your port of entry when arriving from Ireland. As for flights from the Carribean, I do not know, as I've never flown there.

To the poster's original question. DL would not have the choice of preclearing in CDG. That would really be up to the US Department of Homeland Security. If the US were to set up a preclearance facility outside of Canada anywhere, I would imagine it would be at LHR first.

The reason why preclearance in Canada is so critical is that the vast majority of transborder flights go between smaller cities, or a small city and a big city. For example, BDL, while an international airport, has only on-call customs. AC has 5 or 6 flights a day to BDL, none on a plane bigger than a DH8. It would be really complicated to take those 200 or so passengers through customs and immigration. Much easier to send them through in YUL or YYZ. BDL, for all its trying, does not have any flights to CDG, LHR or AMS!

I have always thought, however, that EI could set up a pretty neat Euro-to-US hub operation if they had enough 757s to do it. Somewhat along the lines of what CO has at EWR. Unfortunately, the SNN stopover killed that idea before it was born.



146,319,320,321,333,343,722,732,733,734,735,73G,738,744,752,762,763,772,ARJ,BE1,CRJ,D9S,D10,DH8,ERJ,E70,F100,S80
User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 4133 times:

The US gummint very much would like for more flights to be pre-screened. I expect to see US immigration facilities set up at some european airports over the next several years. LHR and FRA are the more likely airports and both have major terminal work ongoing or soon to start. Since the US gummint has been pushing this for a while, I would not be surprised to see US immigration facilities in LHR T5.

User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4078 times:

Quoting Zvezda (Reply 3):
I would not be surprised to see US immigration facilities in LHR T5.

I would. T5 will serve only one airline with US routes. This not being a US airline would certainly raise a number of eyebrows in Chicago and Dallas.

Preclearance, as done in Canada, works because all transborder flights operate from a dedicated terminal. This would be required elsewhere as well, and I really don't see that on the plans of any European airport.


User currently offlineZvezda From Lithuania, joined Aug 2004, 10511 posts, RR: 64
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 4073 times:

Quoting ANother (Reply 4):
T5 will serve only one airline with US routes. This not being a US airline would certainly raise a number of eyebrows in Chicago and Dallas.

Good point. Thanks.

Quoting ANother (Reply 4):

Preclearance, as done in Canada, works because all transborder flights operate from a dedicated terminal. This would be required elsewhere as well, and I really don't see that on the plans of any European airport.

What about the C concourse at FRA? At some times of the day, it is used exclusively for flights to the US.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Neighbors PHX & Vegas Competing For Int'l Flights. posted Thu Apr 6 2006 04:21:59 by Juventus
Mexico's Aeromar To Lease 2 RJs For GUA Flights? posted Mon Nov 20 2006 23:38:18 by Juventus
QF Now Offers Online Check In For Domestic Flights posted Sun Oct 22 2006 09:39:54 by Safs
Schedule Of Former Us Airlines Flights CDG-USA posted Sat Oct 21 2006 21:05:39 by Airlittoralguy
Why Does Sandford Get More Int. Flights Than Mco posted Tue Oct 17 2006 23:22:13 by Fll2993
Intra-European Flights Outside Of Home Market... posted Sun Sep 17 2006 17:06:49 by Gilesdavies
Checkin For ME Flights @ CDG posted Fri Sep 15 2006 20:49:13 by Mozart
AA Carry-on Policy For International Flights posted Wed Aug 23 2006 23:46:49 by Etrast
EZY Problems Hiring Cabin Staff For NCL Flights! posted Mon Aug 7 2006 23:27:04 by VinnieWinnie
TW 707-131B Flights Ouside USA! posted Mon Aug 7 2006 19:30:24 by CV990