Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
IB 767's, Why Not Kept?  
User currently offline767-332ER From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2030 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2349 times:

Around the turn of the century and up to 2001, Iberia had gone from having UX wet leased two 767-300ER's to purchasing and operating the aircraft with their own pilots. My question is really why after having made such move would the airline dispose of them so quickly? They seemed like an excellent fit, and in regards to the operation of heavier twins could have been a good replacement for trunk routes operated by the A300's. I know they were often seem operating transatlantic routes as well as heavier trunk European routes and "Puente Aereo" routes.

Seemed like a good fit in my book, anyone here know the specific details?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © AirNikon




Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIBERIA747 From Spain, joined Aug 2003, 1831 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2326 times:

Hola Eric!

As far as I know, IB got rid of them as a consequence of the "post-Sept 11th" situation. IB reduced operations and decided that they didn't need those aircraft anymore.

They also delayed the delivery of many A320-family aircraft.

Both 767s went to Kenya Airways after leaving Iberia on December 2001.
EC-GSU became 5Y-KQV and EC-GTI became 5Y-KQW.

Currently both aircraft are flying with Air Canada as C-GHPF and C-GHPH respectively.



¡¡VIVA ESPAÑA!!
User currently offline767-332ER From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 2030 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2313 times:

Quoting IBERIA747 (Reply 1):
Hola Eric!

As far as I know, IB got rid of them as a consequence of the "post-Sept 11th" situation. IB reduced operations and decided that they didn't need those aircraft anymore.

They also delayed the delivery of many A320-family aircraft.

Both 767s went to Kenya Airways after leaving Iberia on December 2001.
EC-GSU became 5Y-KQV and EC-GTI became 5Y-KQW.

Currently both aircraft are flying with Air Canada as C-GHPF and C-GHPH respectively.

Hermano!!! Que pasa!!!?

Hope you're doing well!

I see regarding the post 9/11 situation. Do you know if they were slated to receive any more? They just seemed like such a good aircraft to keep, specially for the Peninsula-Canarias routes. Seem like 747's and A340/3/600's are a bit too much for those routes.

Regards and abrazos.



Twinjets...if one fails, work the other one twice as hard!!!
User currently offlineRootsAir From Costa Rica, joined Feb 2005, 4186 posts, RR: 40
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2277 times:

Knowing IB is very airbus doesn't surprise me they dropped their 767's.

Too bad they didn't replace them by A330's



A man without the knowledge of his past history,culture and origins is like a tree without roots
User currently offlineTriStar500 From Germany, joined Nov 1999, 4695 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2238 times:

Quoting IBERIA747 (Reply 1):
As far as I know, IB got rid of them as a consequence of the "post-Sept 11th" situation. IB reduced operations and decided that they didn't need those aircraft anymore.

Additionally, IB dropped a whole lot of other leases at that time, e.g. UX-operated B733, B734 and B757, which were flying on behalf of the national carrier in IB colors.



Homer: Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!
User currently offlineIB787 From Spain, joined Jun 2005, 126 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2197 times:

One B767-300 was used on BCN-JFK route. That flight was dropped in 2001 due to post 9/11 scenario and low-yields even if that route was subsidized by catalonian government.

Don't forget that IB has had a "4engines 4 long haul" for a long time so neither 767s nor A330s really fitted in their fleet plans.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Want To Change Dates In IB Flight.why Not Allowed? posted Mon Jun 26 2006 09:00:22 by Toulouse
NW And The 767: Why Not? posted Wed Aug 24 2005 08:32:13 by Centrair
AA Replacing TW 767's, Why Not 757's? posted Thu Jun 21 2001 01:05:51 by Boeing nut
Why Not A Big 767 Fleet In Am? posted Thu Sep 16 2004 02:08:01 by RCS763av
Why Not 767 For Nwa? posted Mon Jan 22 2001 03:56:27 by Dandy_don
Why Not Many BA To S. America posted Thu Nov 23 2006 14:29:14 by Amirs
British Airways @ Heathrow T3 Why Not Also At T2? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 13:52:08 by 8herveg
Why NOT -- AA To GEO And PMB? posted Sat Oct 28 2006 01:34:08 by AJMIA
LGW -why Not A Tunnel To Pier 2, North Terminal posted Tue Oct 24 2006 15:22:31 by TimRees
Why A340 - Why Not A330 If Less Fuel Consumption? posted Thu Oct 5 2006 17:50:31 by LordHowe