Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Change Of Model Designation  
User currently offlineMlglaw From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 53 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1922 times:

737-100, -200, -300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -800, -900, BBJ, and BBJ-2! When do the changes become significant enough for the plane to have the model number changed; or, is Boeing trying to set a record for the number of 737's manufactured?


Sumus Primi BLS'60 - Oderint dum metuant!
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21500 posts, RR: 60
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1916 times:

737-200Adv, 737-700ER, 737-900ER, 737C (various types)


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAloha717200 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 4478 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 1905 times:

This post sounds like flamebait, but I'll address it anyway. The changes to an aircraft warrant a new model number when the changes are of a significant nature. "ER" "LR" designations come when boeing (or any other manufacturer) adds extra range/fuel capacity to an existing airframe, without major structural changes. These would be changes that do not alter the overall look of the aircraft very much.

-200, -300, -400 etc desginations come with major structural changes, such as a fuselage stretch or shrink. These would be "visible" changes, as the shape of the aircraft is altered.

Then of course you have your IGW/HGW desgination...where powerplants/wing surfaces etc are altered so as to provide an aircraft with extra payload/range capabilities. Sometimes these are clearly visible changes, sometimes, you have to look harder.

In essence, if the aircraft only receives a new desgination when significant changes are made to it. It has nothing to do with having the most models in the market....it is a response to market demand. Some airlines require a long range 737 for long thin routes....others need a plane with the same capacity, but less range, to cover shorter hops without hurting the bottom line. Boeing does what it can to respond to market demands...but because the two 737s in question here are built for different puposes, both need a distinguishable designation so that the airlines know which to order for their needs.


User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 1865 times:

Some changes can be very suttle. I have personally done a few conversions to Embraer 145's that only required a change to the AFM, but by doing so required a model designation change...which required us to change that data plate.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Change Of Tax posted Tue May 30 2006 00:49:57 by Glom
Change Of Crew From B-C From A? posted Thu Jan 26 2006 21:41:11 by AirCanada014
Change Of Planes In SJU Or MIA? posted Mon Jan 9 2006 03:05:38 by COEWRNJ
CO47 Stopover And Change Of Equipment posted Thu Dec 22 2005 22:08:03 by WF2BNN
Name Change Of BWI posted Sat Oct 29 2005 02:11:27 by Midway737
Change Of Plan @ BA CitiExpress. posted Wed Sep 28 2005 11:05:09 by Timetable
AA Change Of Equipment posted Thu Jul 21 2005 04:09:15 by N62NA
WHY The Change Of CO 1636/1637 To Barbados posted Thu Jun 16 2005 20:55:05 by Aerofan
Ib 958/9 Change Of Plane? posted Fri May 13 2005 02:29:29 by United905
Same AC Type Change-Of-Gauge posted Sat Mar 12 2005 10:27:29 by Lincoln
Change Of Crew From B-C From A? posted Thu Jan 26 2006 21:41:11 by AirCanada014