Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
787 Cabin Less Open Than Promised?  
User currently offlineJAAlbert From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1626 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5492 times:

I just took a look at Boeing's brochure for the 787. Pages, 9 through 11 show the general cabin layout for the three models now offered. What a surprise. The glossy photos that Boeing has released have shown arched and open entry vestibules and a single room cabin, where one can see virtually from the front of the plane to the back.

The cabin layout in the brochure, however, depicts lavatories situated in the center of the cabin, blocking the view from one section of the cabin to the other and multiple lavatories on either side of the exterior doors. This looks much less open than the photos have suggested.

Am I mistaken, or will the 787's interior be much less revolutionary than promised in the photos?

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/787brochure.pdf (pages, 9, 10, 11)

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5457 times:

Quoting JAAlbert (Thread starter):
Am I mistaken, or will the 787's interior be much less revolutionary than promised in the photos?

Well where do you propose the put the heads then? Down below like the A346 which makes you lose cargo space? I think you will be pleased with the final product of the 787 but at the end of the day it is still a tube with wings and there are only so many places to stick things.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineKnoxibus From France, joined Aug 2007, 260 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5448 times:

I wonder why you would consider having an arch and seeing through the whole cabin being revolutionary in the first place, even with more humidity.

Don't get me wrong, I am sure this will be the best cabin to come out of a production line on a commercial airliner (remains the noise issue though, and this we can only judge when it flies commercially), but then again, the galleys and lavatory arrangements will still be classical, although more customisable because of the use of super panels.



No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.
User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5448 times:

Quoting JAAlbert (Thread starter):
Am I mistaken, or will the 787's interior be much less revolutionary than promised in the photos?

That was a demo configuration to show potential customers as many cabin options as possible and provide a sense of ambiance in a small space. It's also designed to allow groups to pass through, hence the open design with no lavs.

I don't think anyone actually thought that was indicative of the in-service cabins. As was pointed out many times on this site, the demo config had no seat belts, IFE, galleys, lavs, etc.

In terms of cabin comfort items that will be in the production aircraft, the very large cargo bins, large windows, high cabin pressure/humidity, and the ambiance features will be fitted to in-service aircraft.


User currently offlineSaturn5 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5405 times:

It is becoming extremely boring. There was a very long thread on the identical subject but someone else was complaining about the cabin being too 'open', now you are bitching that it is not open enough. The whole issue is becoming laughable. I don't see anything revolutionary in either the 'open' or 'closed' concept. It is an artificial problem - typical of the a.net stuff. I suggest you imagine practicality of a large aircraft like 787 with all lavatories and galleys crammed into a single corner. Sorry but I fail to see anything groundbreaking in such arrangement.  Sad

By the way I have never seen any glossy photos of the 787 interior (and yes, I have seen them all) even remotely suggesting that you will have an unobstructed view of the whole cabin - which by the way I don't think would be neither a desirable nor 'revolutionary' thing from the design standpoint. Who want to sit in an sausage like amphitheatre with 240 other people.


User currently offlineAndesSMF From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5405 times:

I thought that the 'revolutionary' aspects of the cabin were the bigger, windows, higher humidity and lower pressure. Correct me if I am wrong.

User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3673 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5386 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Actually, they do show a lav in the 787 mock-up pictures. The closet looking thing with the green light in the first picture and then red in the second picture is the lav.





User currently offlineSaturn5 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 5386 times:

Quoting AndesSMF (Reply 5):
I thought that the 'revolutionary' aspects of the cabin were the bigger, windows, higher humidity and lower pressure. Correct me if I am wrong.

And you are absolutely correct. Add to your list the special built-in lighting effects. This 'too open' (for some) or 'too closed' (for some) is becoming a daily staple of a.net 787 hair-splitting exercise.


User currently offlineIkarus2006 From Netherlands, joined Apr 2006, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5027 times:

Boeing and Teague Design (kind of official Boeing partner for all B industrial design based in Seattle - www.teague.com) did an interesting job with that mock-up.

However, as many of you already pointed out, the "open" design will have to compromise with galleys and lavatories in the end.
It is interesting to see what the future developments will be in those two areas.

As for galleys, I am sure there must be some possible development but it might not happen very soon - the actual level of organization and refinement of galley space is pretty high - please feel free to comment on this.

As for the lavatories, they tend to get more chic especially in Business and First and you cannot really squeeze them away in a tiny corner for economy passengers. The bottom line is that also a quite "big" passenger must be able to turn around in all safety inside it, so...
The A380 lavatories will, if I am correct, include a window and even a shower in some versions, but this is on a plane with a special size.
I wonder if Boeing will offer clients like EK, who plan to use showers according to rumors on their A380, the option of having them also on some of its twin aisle models... might not be the 787 though.

Just some considerations - your comments are welcome!


User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2234 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 4948 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The seat maps in the link make the 787 look like a 777. All economy configs are in 3-3-3 seating, how comfy is that...

The hype is fading fast...



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineAADC10 From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2103 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4328 times:

The photos were obviously shot with a very short lens giving an impression of spaceeousness. This mock-up illustrates what is possible, not necessarily what it will really look like. Does anyone remember the 747 mock up for a cargo level passenger lounge with a window looking straight down?

I suspect that the real interior is going to look similar to a 777, only narrower. Ack. It looks like the only two things the 787 will provide passengers are larger windows and higher humidity. Other than that, you will be better off in a 777.


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31444 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4295 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

In the end, Boeing (like Airbus) puts in what the customer's have delivered to the factory's front door, including seats, lavatories, galleys, and what-not.

Boeing/Teague and Airbus/BMW just show what's possible if making money from flying their airliner isn't a concern.  devil 


User currently offlineRheinbote From Germany, joined May 2006, 1968 posts, RR: 52
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4244 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 11):
In the end, Boeing (like Airbus) puts in what the customer's have delivered to the factory's front door, including seats, lavatories, galleys, and what-not.

Note quite. With the 787, there's no more BFE in the cabin except in F class. For B and Y class customers have to chose pre-engineered standard items from the catalogue...for the sake of rapid customization cycle times. Of course, the catalogue reflects customer's requirements, but the caveat is that you actually can blame Boeing now for devising crammed interiors  Wink


User currently offlineStar_world From Ireland, joined Jun 2001, 1234 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4236 times:

Slightly OT, but there are some interesting mistakes in that brochure. The most amusing is probably the required takeoff distance (at max range) for the 787-9 on page 19, which is shown as around 3,000km  Smile

User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4179 times:

Boeing hasn't lasted 90 years by building products that are less than promised.  Wink


Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineRedFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 4376 posts, RR: 27
Reply 15, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 19 hours ago) and read 4159 times:

I found it interesting that the brochure makes no mention of 8-abreast seating and shows all seating diagrams with 9-abreast. Looks like they've given up on marketing the 8x seating since the majority of airlines have ordered it with 9x. Oh well, it was nice to dream while it lasted.


My other home is a Piper Cherokee 180C
User currently offlineATLflyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 740 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (8 years 7 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 3995 times:

I was so excited when I first heard about the 787, but now it looks like it will be an awful plane to fly on. Yeah yeah..higher humidity, bigger windows...whatever..when it comes down to it we are going to be in those terrible 17'' seats for longer than ever. And for all of the people that say well they will be the same as the 747, so it is ok...well no it is not. I have flown on the 747 before and it is NOT a comfortable aircraft.

The WSJ had a special "Middle Seat" article today about reader's responses to the article a few days ago on the 787's 9-abreast, 17'' inch seats. All the readers were saying they would pay more $ for a 19'' seat. Also, some people noted that the airlines need to inform them better about their offerings...because until then, people will make a selection solely on price. I hope Continental comes through and puts 8-abreast seating..then it really would be the premier US Airline.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing 787 Cabin Configurations posted Tue Mar 14 2006 00:38:59 by ATLflyer
SQ Told: A380 Better Than Promised posted Sat Nov 12 2005 06:10:24 by Abba
787/A350 To Open SAN Market? posted Mon Oct 10 2005 22:11:13 by JakeOrion
787 Cabin Interiors Video posted Thu Aug 11 2005 03:42:17 by MX-757
A380-Less Windows Than Normal Planes?!? posted Sun Apr 10 2005 14:15:36 by LHB727230Adv
U.S. Domestic F, Less Legroom Than Y+ On BA/VS/BR posted Tue Aug 13 2002 07:21:35 by Bobcat
I Just Wanna See The Cabin Door Open, Can I? posted Fri May 24 2002 07:09:02 by Flyboy80
AA 772s Have Less Capacity Than Others? posted Tue May 22 2001 06:19:11 by SJC>SFO
787 - More Cabin Area Than A350 posted Thu Jun 16 2005 15:10:48 by Navion
Boeing 787 To Have Best Cabin Air/Comfort Ever posted Sun Oct 8 2006 20:32:05 by RoseFlyer