Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A350: What About Interim A330's Post 2012?  
User currently offlineArt From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3341 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2530 times:

Airbus is a little (litotes) late with A350 EIS compare with 787 EIS. As I understand it, Airbus would supply A330 aircraft to airlines ordering the A350 as an interim measure. If this happens, what will Airbus do with these aircraft when customers hand them back on receiving their A350's?

On this basis, I see a problem: the more A350 orders there are, the more A330's Airbus will end up with in the next decade. What will they do with them? Will they convert them to freighters and sell them as such?

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMyt332 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2003, 9112 posts, RR: 71
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 2524 times:

Quoting Art (Thread starter):
On this basis, I see a problem: the more A350 orders there are, the more A330's Airbus will end up with in the next decade. What will they do with them?

In a world where we still fly DC-8's and 10's from 30 years ago I think a 5 year old A330 will have no problems finding a home.



One Life, Live it.
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4150 posts, RR: 37
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2468 times:

Quite correct - I don't think that Airbus will have big worries about providing interim A330s. One even has to say the more the better. The more A330s are on the market and operated by 2nd-tier carriers / start-ups, the better are Airbus' chances to place new A350 with them.

Not to forget the potential conversion business for A330-200s (and maybe -300s) which will come up at one point. It is expected that the freighter market will grow by 100% until 2020 or so - plenty of space for converted A330s.

AND the spares business - the more busses fly, the more money they can make on spares.



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineArt From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3341 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2417 times:

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 2):
The more A330s are on the market and operated by 2nd-tier carriers / start-ups, the better are Airbus' chances to place new A350 with them.

I think you make good point. However, what price will Airbus get when it sells these "returned" 5 year old A330's in the middle of the next decade? More than it cost to build them? I wonder.


User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4150 posts, RR: 37
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2398 times:

Quoting Art (Reply 3):
I think you make good point. However, what price will Airbus get when it sells these "returned" 5 year old A330's in the middle of the next decade? More than it cost to build them? I wonder.

Depends on the financing anyway. Are these owned by Airbus? Are they owned by the airline? Are they owned by one of the big lessors and just leased? Are they financed by a bank? Will all depend on these factors...

If these A330s have been flown for 5 years for the airline (and are not owned by Airbus, which is seldom anyway), then Airbus has received the buying price usually at aircraft acceptance. If they buy it back 5 years in the future they will certainly pay far less (depending on market, airframe etc condition).

But - as I said before - placing those frames with second-tier and start-ups might be financially quite attractive, as those carriers usually pay some kind of a risk premium factored into the leasing rate anyway (lower buying power compared to tier-one airlines anyway).



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineEI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 2):
The more A330s are on the market and operated by 2nd-tier carriers / start-ups, the better are Airbus' chances to place new A350 with them.

And the less chance ther would be of those airlines ordering the 787.


User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

Quoting Art (Reply 3):
I think you make good point. However, what price will Airbus get when it sells these "returned" 5 year old A330's in the middle of the next decade? More than it cost to build them? I wonder.

That's the point that makes your thesis/argument meritorious. The example/historical comparison of the DC-8 and DC-10 is a good one, as it was the very precipitous, and relatively premature drop in their residual values at the time of a general fleet transition period, that made them attractive as freighter conversions.


User currently offlineKappel From Suriname, joined Jul 2005, 3533 posts, RR: 17
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2312 times:

Quoting Leelaw (Reply 6):
that made them attractive as freighter conversions.

That would of course also be attractive for the a332's. relatively new, but probably cheaper than a new a332F, IMHO lots of airlines would like this option to replace older a300F's



L1011,733,734,73G,738,743,744,752,763,772,77W,DC855,DC863,DC930,DC950,MD11,MD88,306,319,320,321,343,346,ARJ85,CR7,E195
User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2263 times:

Quoting Kappel (Reply 7):
That would of course also be attractive for the a332's. relatively new, but probably cheaper than a new a332F, IMHO lots of airlines would like this option to replace older a300F's

Such a "swap-out" scheme, would definitely be a delicate balancing act and relatively risky. IMO, after nearly twenty years experience in used-aircraft transactions, Airbus would be extremely fortunate to even breakeven with such an enterprise on a discounted cash flow basis.


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 29680 posts, RR: 84
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2249 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The A330 is a very solid plane and might very well find homes with smaller carriers who cannot afford the "latest and greatest" equipment. But more then residual values, I'd be a bit worried about how many airlines are in a position to face a competitor operating a more efficient plane with lower overall operating costs (the 787).

User currently offlineLeelaw From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2170 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 9):
The A330 is a very solid plane and might very well find homes with smaller carriers who cannot afford the "latest and greatest" equipment. But more then residual values, I'd be a bit worried about how many airlines are in a position to face a competitor operating a more efficient plane with lower overall operating costs (the 787).

The other reality that addresses this point, is that some of the "second-tier" operators have options to acquire/finance new-build aircraft through lessors at an attractive relative cost, that didn't exist 10-15 years ago; it has significantly changed the dynamics of the second-hand (after) market. Bottom-line is, if an OEM has to devise all sorts of "Rube Goldberg" schemes to sell a new-build, based on a clean sheet design, and its competitor doesn't, there might be something wrong with the business plan and/or the design.

[Edited 2006-05-23 16:44:15]

User currently offlineBoeingguy1 From Ireland, joined Jan 2006, 415 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 2032 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 9):
The A330 is a very solid plane and might very well find homes with smaller carriers who cannot afford the "latest and greatest" equipment.

This strikes me as funny- Today, planes we see as old, without A-VOD or PTVs such as a 747-200 or a DC-10 or L-1011... in years to come, they will be 777's, A330's... it just amazes me!



Gatwick South! Id rather crash in Brighton!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What About The A330-500? posted Fri Sep 29 2000 12:23:54 by Rw
What About The A330-100? posted Mon Mar 20 2000 16:34:27 by El Al 001
What The New A350 Says About The A320NG? posted Tue Jul 18 2006 06:23:44 by WingedMigrator
What About Air Inter's A330's? posted Thu Dec 7 2000 00:43:59 by TurboTristar
Mass Diversions -- What About Landing Fees, Slots? posted Tue Nov 21 2006 10:27:41 by Brenintw
If DL Left SLC What About The Regionals? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 06:23:42 by IdaBoy
GA To Operate 763s? What About The A330s? posted Fri Sep 29 2006 20:51:25 by Mandala499
Oilprice Down - What About The Fuel Surcharges? posted Fri Sep 22 2006 23:41:18 by Chiguire
What About Passengers Connecting At BKK posted Tue Sep 19 2006 20:15:05 by Cricket
What About The Two DC-10s Which Crashlanded 2006? posted Sat Aug 12 2006 01:39:11 by NA