Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Russian Regional Jet, How Will It Fair In The West  
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9698 times:

Heya,

Well reading through Airliners World i noticed an item on the Russian Regional Jet, the RRJ.

The aircraft are:

RRJ60 - Passengers = 60-63, Range = 3,204km, Range (LR) = 4,870km.

RRJ75 - Passengers = 75-78, Range = 3,265km, Range (LR) = 4,760km.

RRJ95 - Passengers = 95-98, Range = 3,050km, Range (LR) = 4,485km.

-- Orders --

Well Siberia Airlines have ordered 50 RRJ95's, there have been orders from the Russian Postal Service, 20 were ordered from UTair and a Dubai based lessor (Concord Aviation) has ordered 20. Aeroflot will have also ordered 30.

Now, to the best news. Air France, Iberia, SAS and SN Brussels Airlines are said to be very interested in the RRJ series.

If the Western airlines such as the 4 mentioned above were to place orders for over 100, between them, then would this make the RRJ the most successful Russian Built aircraft for the Western Market?

Also, do any of you have any views towards this aircraft? Personally, i think it really looks like a nice aircraft and hope mroe Western airlines buy them. They must be a competitor for the A318.

Thanks
Mike

25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3516 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9679 times:

If they manage to get good economics, a better distribution system, a transparent management and political guarantees, then I see LH as a possible customer, as well, but I am, of course, not an expert inside LH.

I think the RRJ could fit for LH, because LH needs regional jets, apparently doesn't like Embraer, and has not so many alternatives on the market.

Apart from that, as the biggest German carrier, this could also be a decision which would get a positive political response, because Germany is interested in strengthening the relations to the russian aviation industry. LH certainly is completely independent in its decisions, but still, if a decision can give positive political response, that isn't a reason against buying a plane.

LH only needs to convince its customers that a "russian" plane is as safe as a western one. We all know that is the case, but it still is a very important marketing issue.


User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 9653 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
LH only needs to convince its customers that a "russian" plane is as safe as a western one. We all know that is the case, but it still is a very important marketing issue.

Jesus, a BRAND NEW AIRCRAFT with a design that is similar to an Airbus and an Embraer.

If it looks similar, why should the customers need to know anymore info? Personally, if a Customer see's an aircraft that looks like one that is already flying around then they will probably assume it is an Airbus or something.

Also, how much does the average person actually look at the aircraft before boarding?

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineVisakow From United States of America, joined May 2006, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9587 times:

I hope they are successful. I really would like to see the Russian aviation industry perform better in the western market. Would else help provide a little more diversity. This is the first I've heard of an RJ from them.

User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9572 times:

Quoting Visakow (Reply 3):

Heya,

Well the manufacturer is Sukhoi. That is just some small info.

But, here is a webpage for you to read if you wish: http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/projects/rrj/

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineKFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3296 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9555 times:

Some information on it:



http://www.sukhoi.org/eng/planes/projects/rrj/




http://www.ainonline.com/Features/regionalbusaircraft/rrj.html



"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
User currently offlineSaturn5 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 9529 times:

It looks like Boeing is supporting this project so maybe something will come out of that.

User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9495 times:

Quoting Saturn5 (Reply 6):

Here is news from the page to back that up:

Quote:
28 October 2004

The Technical Council incorporating representatives of the Sukhoy Civil Aircraft and Boeing companies with advisory participation of the Snecma company adopted a resolution declaring Stage Four of the RRJ Programme to be successfully completed, which means readiness for a full-scale launch of the Programme to start production of aeroplanes. This resolution was passed following a meeting of task teams of the companies Sukhoi Civil Aircraft and Boeing, which took place in Moscow 25-28 October. The representatives of both companies reviewed the progress of work under the RRJ programme, including issues of marketing and sales, design and development, production, certification and aftersales support.

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineSaturn5 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 313 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9451 times:

There was an interesting article on this subject in Aviation Week and Space Technology discussing Boeing's motives to participate on this project. Apparently Boeing sees a huge market in Russia for its airplanes but the obstacle is the Russian government which levies huge import duties on foreign aircraft insisting that it must protect its industrial base. The only hope for those duties to be rescinded is reviving the Russian own domestic production of some aircraft that will finally be a success and sell well among Russian carriers. Hence their (Boeing's) support for RRJ as a way to eventually gaining a share of the Russian aviation market for themselves.

User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 31
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 9431 times:

Quoting KFLLCFII (Reply 5):

Dang thing looks like an a318 and an ERJ-170 met late one night, had a bit too much jet-a and this was the blue haired offspring that resulted  spin . Looks cool thou.



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineKFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3296 posts, RR: 30
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 9410 times:

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 9):
Dang thing looks like an a318 and an ERJ-170 met late one night, had a bit too much jet-a and this was the blue haired offspring that resulted

So THAT'S why the A318 kept getting written up for itching around the fuel cap...



"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 9262 times:

Quoting Saturn5 (Reply 8):
There was an interesting article on this subject in Aviation Week and Space Technology discussing Boeing's motives to participate on this project. Apparently Boeing sees a huge market in Russia for its airplanes but the obstacle is the Russian government which levies huge import duties on foreign aircraft insisting that it must protect its industrial base. The only hope for those duties to be rescinded is reviving the Russian own domestic production of some aircraft that will finally be a success and sell well among Russian carriers. Hence their (Boeing's) support for RRJ as a way to eventually gaining a share of the Russian aviation market for themselves.

and... Could this mean the end of perhaps some Aviation companies such as Ilyushin or Tupolov?

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4160 posts, RR: 36
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 9244 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
I think the RRJ could fit for LH, because LH needs regional jets, apparently doesn't like Embraer, and has not so many alternatives on the market.

Do they really need that many new RJs these days? IMO the recent CRJ900 order and the Air One CRJ900 order plus the talk that Contact Air is getting 70-seat jets more or less points into the direction that there is no given need for a new frame.

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Thread starter):
Siberia Airlines have ordered 50 RRJ95's

That one still current? Had understood that S7 was disappointed with what Sukhoi had shown them recently and had scaled-back/cancelled their order?!?

The overall chances of this plane in the West are currently difficult to judge. What makes them very attractive is the low price tag - about 1/3 cheaper compared to the Embraers. What is absolutely necessary is the correct setup of a support network - plus passenger acceptance has to be there. Russian airframes still HAVE a negative connotation, and that's nothing which will be gone by tomorrow.



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineQXatFAT From Israel, joined Feb 2006, 2404 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 9228 times:

I think the RRJ60 actually looks quite ulgy. And the RRJ95 looks to much like an Airbus. I wouldnt ride any of these in my opinion.


Don't Tread On Me!
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2172 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 9171 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 12):
Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
I think the RRJ could fit for LH, because LH needs regional jets, apparently doesn't like Embraer, and has not so many alternatives on the market.

Do they really need that many new RJs these days? IMO the recent CRJ900 order and the Air One CRJ900 order plus the talk that Contact Air is getting 70-seat jets more or less points into the direction that there is no given need for a new frame.

I think you are right. The LH CRJ900 will have 84 seats and the Air One CRJ900 will have 90 seats, so there will be plenty of seats available (total number of a/c ordered are 18 + 4 options so far).

Quoting Flying-Tiger (Reply 12):
That one still current? Had understood that S7 was disappointed with what Sukhoi had shown them recently and had scaled-back/cancelled their order?!?

I read somewhere that they had scaled back their firm order to 30 aircraft from 50.



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
User currently offlineJoost From Netherlands, joined Apr 2005, 3164 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 9141 times:

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Reply 11):
and... Could this mean the end of perhaps some Aviation companies such as Ilyushin or Tupolov?

If my memory serves me right, one of these 2 companies is a partner in the RRJ program. However, I can not find information on this anymore, so I'm not a 100% certain.


User currently offlineBirdwatching From Germany, joined Sep 2003, 3810 posts, RR: 51
Reply 16, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 9129 times:

Quoting QXatFAT (Reply 13):
I think the RRJ60 actually looks quite ulgy. And the RRJ95 looks to much like an Airbus. I wouldnt ride any of these in my opinion.

You wouldn't ride on these two because one looks ugly and one looks like an Airbus?  Yeah sure

Soren  santahat 



All the things you probably hate about travelling are warm reminders that I'm home
User currently offlineFlying-Tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4160 posts, RR: 36
Reply 17, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9114 times:

There is a report from yesterday that Sukhoi is currently talking to Dalavia, Transaero and to Pulkovo and expects to finalize orders this year. In addition they expect to sign SAS for 22 frames this year, and have Air France high up on their agenda as well. So there might be the break-through for Sukhoi this year already...


Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offline777way From Pakistan, joined Dec 2005, 5716 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 9089 times:

Airwise reports that SAS have said no to the aircraft.

User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6483 posts, RR: 3
Reply 19, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 8985 times:

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Reply 11):
and... Could this mean the end of perhaps some Aviation companies such as Ilyushin or Tupolov?

No, but the Russian government's intention to merge Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Irkut, Tupolev, Ilyushin, and Yakovlev does mean the end of those companies. Strangely enough, the new company will be called "United Aircraft."



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineVisakow From United States of America, joined May 2006, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 8923 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 19):
No, but the Russian government's intention to merge Mikoyan, Sukhoi, Irkut, Tupolev, Ilyushin, and Yakovlev does mean the end of those companies. Strangely enough, the new company will be called "United Aircraft."

I have read and heard the same. The Russian Government is trying to get everybody to cooperate to better compete in the foreign marketplace. IMO that is the only way they will survive. From a space & military standpoint that is a whole different ballgame.



 optimist 


User currently offlineDogfighter2111 From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 1968 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 8845 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 19):



Quoting Visakow (Reply 20):

Well, thanks for those posts guys. If that is indeed true, then it MAY be a good survival tactic but in the long run will airlines buy aircraft from a company that has workers, designers, management etc. from the current Manufacturers?

The current manufacturers being unsucesfull in the West!

Thanks
Mike


User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8942 posts, RR: 40
Reply 22, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 8777 times:

Quoting N328KF (Reply 19):



Quoting Visakow (Reply 20):

AFAIK that has already happened.

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Reply 21):
then it MAY be a good survival tactic but in the long run will airlines buy aircraft from a company that has workers, designers, management etc. from the current Manufacturers?

The current manufacturers being unsucesfull in the West!

Might as well give it a try.

Cheers



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7402 posts, RR: 57
Reply 23, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 8751 times:

Even if they said to be "interested", I highly doubt to see AF, LH, or any Major West-European airline buying it.

The Russians make excellent planes, but they are new comers on that market. They would have to prove their reliability and efficiency, compared to well established Embraer and/or Bombardier (look what happens with the Tu-204, Tu-334, An-140 etc ...).
Their planes might be cheaper than Airbus or Embraer, I don't think AF/LH/SK/IB are ready to take such a big risk to add a complete new a/c type (with all the consequences) into their fleet just for this reason, when they are already well committed with their "usual" suppliers.

But there is certainly a great market for these RJ in Africa/Asia/Middle East, where some airlines are in desperate need of aircraft replacement but can't afford to buy brand new Airbus/Boeing/Embraer.


User currently offlineTod From Denmark, joined Aug 2004, 1724 posts, RR: 3
Reply 24, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 8695 times:

Quoting Dogfighter2111 (Reply 4):
the manufacturer is Sukhoi.

Along with B/E Aerospace and their Flight Structures division.

Tod


User currently offlinePlanespotting From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3524 posts, RR: 5
Reply 25, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 8578 times:

Quoting Cadet57 (Reply 9):
Dang thing looks like an a318 and an ERJ-170 met late one night, had a bit too much jet-a and this was the blue haired offspring that resulted

haha...i was thinking the same thing. don't think i could have stated it so..."eloquently"



Do you like movies about gladiators?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Russian Bombings... If It Happened In The US posted Mon Aug 30 2004 09:33:27 by Artsyman
Russian Airliners In The West posted Sun May 2 2004 07:07:30 by Planenutz
It's Simple: In The US Market, Only LCCs Will Grow posted Wed Nov 19 2003 08:10:43 by UA744Flagship
Russian Airliners In The West. posted Thu Apr 4 2002 19:29:37 by Planenutz
Avianca Will Absorb SAM In The Short Term posted Fri Feb 17 2006 22:42:14 by RICARIZA
European Black List: How Will It Affect Aviation? posted Wed Nov 16 2005 15:24:11 by Glidepath73
Russian Regional Jet posted Tue Nov 8 2005 03:58:31 by Hjulicher
HP Rampers: How Is It Working In PHX? posted Mon Jun 27 2005 01:26:37 by Starburst
Where Will PIT Be In The New HP/US Deal? posted Tue May 17 2005 18:28:14 by Jdwfloyd
WN And HP Routes In The West Question posted Thu Apr 21 2005 01:11:55 by PanAm747